<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Hellobee Boards Tag: posterior cervix</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/</link>
<description>Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:47:07 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>yellowbird on "#2: 39wks, low head, posterior cervix, barely dilated"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/2-39wks-low-head-posterior-cervix-barely-dilated#post-2186365</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 18:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>yellowbird</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2186365@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@andthewildones:  I ended up getting cervidil at 40+3 and had a super fast birth &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://boards.hellobee.com/topic/baby-yellowbird-2s-birth-story#post-2133085&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://boards.hellobee.com/topic/baby-yellowbird-2s-birth-story#post-2133085&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>andthewildones on "#2: 39wks, low head, posterior cervix, barely dilated"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/2-39wks-low-head-posterior-cervix-barely-dilated#post-2186360</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 18:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>andthewildones</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2186360@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@yellowbird:  hunting down your birth story now?? by the end of the appt today my dr was like inching out the door which i think was the most discouraging. just sit down and tell me what all this means even tho i've had one already!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>yellowbird on "#2: 39wks, low head, posterior cervix, barely dilated"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/2-39wks-low-head-posterior-cervix-barely-dilated#post-2186294</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 16:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>yellowbird</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2186294@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Me!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;At 40 weeks she was able to &#34;move my cervix anterior&#34; along with stripping my membranes. I was about 1 cm from 38 weeks on
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>andthewildones on "#2: 39wks, low head, posterior cervix, barely dilated"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/2-39wks-low-head-posterior-cervix-barely-dilated#post-2186254</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 16:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>andthewildones</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2186254@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;any experience out there with a second babe laying low since early on (see: tons of pelvic pressure!) but the cervix remaining posterior and barely dilated? &#34;half a centimeter&#34; is what i was just told. as much as i want DS to come when he's good and ready, this was a little frustrating. by 39wks i would think the head being engaged since 34 weeks would make for some solid progress in these final weeks. she really had to dig back to reach my cervix and i'm wondering also if the head being in front of the cervix could be why with so much pressure and pain there has been so little dilating? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;any information or experience or advice would be appreciated! thanks for letting me get that off my chest.  :bummed:
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
