<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Hellobee Boards Topic: Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/</link>
<description>Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 03:27:08 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>wrkbrk on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2220056</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wrkbrk</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2220056@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@lawbee11:  I freaking love Justice Kennedy. I had a friend who worked with him and he is just an all around brilliant and nice guy.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Yay SCOTUS! My mom sent my wife and me flowers today. :)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mrscobee on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219965</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mrscobee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219965@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MamaG: Those posts drive me nuts!  While I am happy for marriage equality, I think there are some issues with SCOTUS potentially overstepping.  However, I think the people making posts of that nature are super annoying and missing the point entirely.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boopers on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219945</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Boopers</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219945@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsLonghorn:  I'm so happy Dallas County waived the 72 hours! Tarrant County didn't waive (not surprised) and Collin County isn't issuing licenses today. They claim it's a processing issue. Again, not surprised!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MamaG on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219940</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MamaG</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219940@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Is anyone else seeing posts today that feel passive aggressive in nature with a strong Christian tone about how they aren't passing judgement as one sin isn't greater than another, they are praying for our country's leaders and will keep all opinions to themselves?  These posts almost make me more batty than people that are declaring an opinion I don't agree with.  It's annoying to me.  I'd rather them just keep their thoughts in their heads :)  Sorry, rant over.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MamaG on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219902</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MamaG</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219902@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsLonghorn: Oh!  did I misread your original comment.  I apologize.  Dang reading comprehension.  ;)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsLonghorn on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219894</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsLonghorn</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219894@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@lawbee11:  love those pictures!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@mamag: they had announced that they would waive the 72 hour rule, so everyone was already there and ready to go.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MamaG on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219838</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MamaG</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219838@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@lawbee11:  I just saw a video, they were the first couple married in Dallas County today. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@MrsLonghorn: So apparently they aren't sticking to the 72 hour rule like they originally stated.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>winniebee on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219813</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>winniebee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219813@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@lawbee11:  that closing paragraph brought tears to my eyes!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>lawbee11 on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219789</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lawbee11</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219789@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsLonghorn:  OMG this couple is so sweet!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2015/06/26/after-scotus-decision-jack-evans-and-george-harris-go-get-their-marriage-license/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2015/06/26/after-scotus-decision-jack-evans-and-george-harris-go-get-their-marriage-license/&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>winniebee on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219780</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>winniebee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219780@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@Mrs. Pickle:  SAME!   :happy:
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>PurplePeony on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219768</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PurplePeony</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219768@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@LovelyPlum:  I actually would have gone about it differently if I were drafting the opinion. I would have started with the cases dealing with people who are legally married in one state but live/work/travel to other states and are considered unmarried there. The refusal of a state to recognize the laws of another state is clearly unconstitutional. Article IV Section 1 requires each state to give &#34;full faith and credit&#34; to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State&#34; with no exemptions, not for marriage equality or anything else. So if two people have a lawful marriage certificate from state #1, another cannot refuse to recognize it even if those same people couldn't be granted a marriage license in state #2. I would have then moved on to the absurdity of allowing people to be married in state # 2 only if they have the means and opportunity to travel outside the state to become married and then to the main point of whether a constitutional right indeed exists. I don't think it was overreach at all, I just would have laid the foundation differently. I do understand why the majority wanted to deal with the major point and basically said they didn't have to deal with the subsidiary question because of that, I just don't think it made for the strongest possible decision. But clerk for a different sort of judge and no SCOTUS justice will ever ask my opinion, so it's not worth a whole lot, haha.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsSCB on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219720</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsSCB</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219720@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;For more SCOTUS decision fun: Posts like this always make me laugh, especially after having been an intern in TV news (though not in DC. Probably for the best because I'm not a fast runner, lol). &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.ijreview.com/2015/06/353033-the-2015-running-of-the-interns/&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.ijreview.com/2015/06/353033-the-2015-running-of-the-interns/&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>lawbee11 on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219689</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lawbee11</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219689@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@LovelyPlum:  Also, similar arguments were used in interracial marriage cases:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#34;In upholding the constitutionality of these provisions in the decision below, the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia referred to its 1965 decision in Naim v. Naim, 197 Va. 80, 87 S.E.2d 749, as stating the reasons supporting the validity of these laws. In Naim, the state court concluded that the State's legitimate purposes were 'to preserve the racial integrity of its citizens,' and to prevent 'the corruption of blood,' 'a mongrel breed of citizens,' and 'the obliteration of racial pride,' obviously an endorsement of the doctrine of White Supremacy. Id. at 90, 87 S.E.2d at 756. The court also reasoned that marriage has traditionally been subject to state regulation without federal intervention, and, consequently, the regulation of marriage should be left to exclusive state control by the Tenth Amendment.&#34;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>travellingbee on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219688</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>travellingbee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219688@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsSCB:  because being educated is elitist. Sigh.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsSCB on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219682</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsSCB</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219682@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@travellingbee:  Right?! That's what people said after Bush won a second time...why would they think that would make sense?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mrscobee on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219678</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mrscobee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219678@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@LovelyPlum: I share your exact same sentiments.  I am happy for the end result of the ruling but think there is at least some merit to the accusations of judicial overreach.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anya on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219677</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anya</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219677@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@hellobeeboston:  I know, I was being cheeky.. because back in the day they said they were waiting until everyone could marry, then it was all whoops we got married in France.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mrs. Pickle on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219676</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mrs. Pickle</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219676@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Yes! I'm happy that my brother can fall in love and get married just like anyone else now. :D
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>lawbee11 on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219675</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lawbee11</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219675@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsSCB:  LOL! Here's your sign....
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>lawbee11 on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219674</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lawbee11</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219674@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@LovelyPlum:  Depends on how you interpret the Constitution. The majority held that it's an issue that falls under the Fourteenth Amendment so no, I don't see it as judicial overreach because it's the Supreme Court's job to interpret the Constitution. Alito claims that because the Constitution &#34;says nothing about a right to same-sex marriage&#34; that it's judicial overreach. I don't agree with him, but I can see how if you did agree with that then you'd consider it judicial overreach.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>hellobeeboston on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/3#post-2219672</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hellobeeboston</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219672@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@Anya:  they're already married!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@MrsSCB:  hilarious!!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Meowkers on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219668</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Meowkers</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219668@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;#LoveWins!!!!!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>travellingbee on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219656</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>travellingbee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219656@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsSCB:  ha I had just read that on my newsfeed on Facebook. LOL&#60;br /&#62;
ETA: what's so funny is the outright ignorance of these people. Why would you move to Canada? Canada has always been more liberal than the U.S. This whole &#34;moving to Canada&#34; thing started in the 60s with liberals/hippies/pacifists who opposed the Vietnam war and felt like they didn't have a voice in the US. They wanted to get out of the US and go somewhere that more aligned with their values. Right wingers saying I'm moving to Canada is absurd!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>.twist. on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219654</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>.twist.</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219654@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsSCB:  bahahaha!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsSCB on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219652</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsSCB</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219652@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;This made me laugh. A lot :-) &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/its-legal-there#.oj15RjBWd&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/its-legal-there#.oj15RjBWd&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LovelyPlum on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219632</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LovelyPlum</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219632@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Ok, so after reading the decision, here's my question: regardless of what one feels about same sex marriage, is there anything to the accusations of judicial overreach mentioned in the dissent (I'm thinking about Alita in particular). I am glad for the ruling, but I am curious
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mrsjyw on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219611</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mrsjyw</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219611@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;:heart: trumps all. Amazing!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mrs Green Grass on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219604</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mrs Green Grass</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219604@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@lawbee11:  that is the best and what I shared on my feed today. I don't see how you can argue with that...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>catlady on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219601</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>catlady</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219601@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Just saw this.  Amazing news!!!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anya on "Anyone else anxiously awaiting SCOTUS's ruling on same-sex marriage?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/anyone-else-anxiously-awaiting-scotuss-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage/page/2#post-2219592</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anya</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2219592@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Now Angie and Brad can get married!  :silly:
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
