<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Hellobee Boards Topic: Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/</link>
<description>Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 06:42:49 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>GoGoSnoGirl on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858480</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>GoGoSnoGirl</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858480@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsBrewer:  well, def depends on which you use. I splurge &#38;amp; buy CBE digital or First Response (simple line) opks. I haven't had too much trouble reading them, just my own body's variation that can be frustrating. With opks it can be challenging to assess the comparison between the two lines, that is true, whereas with pg tests any line is good news.  :happy:
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858378</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858378@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@GoGoSnoGirl:  I'm kind of nervous to start the OPK's From what I've read on the board they seem very....umm....open to interpretation?? hahahah
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>GoGoSnoGirl on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858353</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>GoGoSnoGirl</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858353@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsBrewer:  yeah, me too... I just can't rely on cm.  Opks seem like an easy(ish) way to see O, usually.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858328</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858328@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@GoGoSnoGirl:  I plan on using OPK's next cycle! I might be naive but I feel like I have literally no change in CM at all. I tried tracking it, but it was always the same. I never got the clearly EWCM. Maybe next cycle with a higher dose of Clomid! Thanks for your input!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>GoGoSnoGirl on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858304</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>GoGoSnoGirl</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858304@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsBrewer:  I can't speak to the meds or monitoring, but as for temping &#38;amp; FF, I often take my temps in the middle of the night, too--anywhere between 1a-7a, but at least after 3h of sleep. I get lots of open circles, but since I also use a secondary method (opks), I do always get crosshairs &#38;amp; confirmation of O. If you can enter any other indicators of O (CM, opks, saliva test for ferning, etc), FF has an easier time confirming O. I imagine being monitored since you're on meds &#38;amp; have pcos would be the best solution, though. Best of luck!  :goodluck:  :happy:
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858294</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858294@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@LindsayInNY:  Thank you! :-) This morning I got what I thought was a very very very faint positive (but I didn't check the PG test until 3 hours later....) I posted it in the Sept POAS board. I have a feel I might be either seeing things, or its just an evap. I just tested again on lunch and it was completely white.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I was just wondering everyone's experiences with temps and O dates!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LindsayInNY on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858280</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LindsayInNY</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858280@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsBrewer:  That makes sense. Sounds like he's waiting until CD42 just to ensure you're not pregnant. It probably can't hurt to ask about switching to a RE. A RE can monitor you when you're on Clomid to see if you're responding, how well, and can adjust the dose as necessary. Good luck  :goodluck:
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858279</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858279@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@LindsayInNY:  Correct, I have PCOS. My doctor said to wait until CD42 and then to make sure to test of course, and then start Provera to induce my period. My period will then normally start on CD55 (on the dot). Sometime between CD 42 and CD 55 I am to go in and have an ultrasound done to see if I have developed any cysts? Gosh I don't remember the specifics. But I think in that same appt I'm going to mention  about possibly switching to an RE.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LAZB on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858273</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LAZB</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858273@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;The month I got pregnant, using Clomid, my temps were all over the place.  I'm not sure if it was just user error or what, but obviously I Oed, because here I am 15+ weeks pregnant.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LindsayInNY on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858261</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LindsayInNY</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858261@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsBrewer:  From what I know, doctors usually start people off at 50mg to see if they respond (depending on the situation). For example, I O naturally so it's unlikely the RE will up my dose. However, if you have PCOS, it might take a higher dose of Clomid for your body to respond and O. Since you're at CD32 and your chart doesn't look like you Oed, I'd be willing to bet you didn't and the 50mg wasn't enough. Did your doctor give you any instructions about AF? Or what if AF doesn't arrive?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858254</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858254@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@LindsayInNY:  Yes, this was my first time on Clomid, and I think I was at the lowest dose.....50? does that sound right?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LindsayInNY on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1858033</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LindsayInNY</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1858033@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MrsBrewer:  I'm not the strictest when it comes to the same time that I temp. But, even so, I've still been able to determine O on my chart (or FF has). Was this your first time on Clomid and what dose were you on?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MaryM on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1857796</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MaryM</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1857796@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;When you put in your temp, it defaults to the current time. If you temped earlier, you should also adjust the time.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1857791</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1857791@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MaryM:  Ok now, dumb question. Does it just remember what time you enter it into the app from your phone? Because I never put in my temp on my phone right after I temp. I normally either try and go back to sleep, or just lay in bed.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MaryM on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1857772</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MaryM</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1857772@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;No problem!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think FF wants temps to generally be within a one hour window or they'll give the open circles.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1857752</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1857752@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MaryM:  Well that is really interesting!! I had no idea that temps would differ that much....&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Well I think from now on I'm just going to try and hold off until I wake up in the morning then so have it be the most accurate.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks for your input!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MaryM on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1857738</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MaryM</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1857738@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;That could explain the erratic temps then.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think TCOYF says each hour your temp rises (on average of course) about .2 degrees. If you look at the early temps and adjust for that, you might very well see a rise. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Usually if I wake up at 3 or 4, I'll temp, but then see if I can't get another 3-4 hours of sleep and temp again at my usual 7. I'll only use the earlier temp if I can't get back to sleep.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1857720</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1857720@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@MaryM:  I thought I was temping pretty consistently. I would always get 3 solid hours before I temp. But the only thing is that I wake up in the middle of the night quite often, so sometimes I would temp at like 3 AM, and other times I would wait till 6-7
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MaryM on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1857716</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MaryM</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1857716@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Yes. OPKs can force an O, and EWCM can also create cross hairs (they may be dashed if you don't have temps to confirm though)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Ope circles instead of dots are usually from temping at erratic times. Were your times not consistent?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;ETA: by &#34;force an O&#34; i meant force a cross hair of course. It's not like we have to see it on FF to actually O :)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrsBrewer on "Erratic temps, but still confirmed O?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/erratic-temps-but-still-confirmed-o#post-1857714</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrsBrewer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1857714@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I’ve been temping this cycle, but my temps are all over the place! I was on Clomid this cycle so I was really hoping I would O this time! I didn't use OPK’s this cycle, but next time I will.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62; If you temp, have you had a cycle where you confirmed O with OPK or some other method, but your temps were all over the place?
&#60;/p&#62;

[attach=1855/14/nbqrtx.600x405.chart.png]</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
