https://boards.hellobee.com/ Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee en Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:12:31 +0000 https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-757614 Thu, 02 May 2013 16:25:05 +0000 daniellemybelle 757614@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>Snugabunny it is! Thanks for all the feedback! </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756612 Thu, 02 May 2013 12:22:00 +0000 Smurfette 756612@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>LO loves her snuggabunny! We don't even put the vibrations on most of the time. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756598 Thu, 02 May 2013 12:18:20 +0000 immabeetoo 756598@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>Loved our snuggabhnny. By the time he was bored of the bird mobile he wanted to be more mobile while playing anyways. We still use it at five months to plop him down while we put on shoes and get ready to leave. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756535 Thu, 02 May 2013 12:02:59 +0000 mediagirl 756535@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>As long as it vibrates and can bounce, I'm all for it. Our bouncers were cheap ($30ish) and she didn't care what it looked like. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756520 Thu, 02 May 2013 11:57:47 +0000 CottonCandy 756520@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>Another vote for Snugabunny here....It was so soft and comfy for our LO and like one pp said, you can get a toy arch if you feel like it isn't as interactive as the rainforest one. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756505 Thu, 02 May 2013 11:53:22 +0000 Mrs. High Heels 756505@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>Snuggabunny. DS doesn't sleep in it at all, but whenever we need to do something, we put him there and he's perfectly content to just sit and stare. Sometimes we don't even have the music on, he's just happy to be rockin' away. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756503 Thu, 02 May 2013 11:53:04 +0000 mrs. wagon 756503@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I would say get the one you like the look of the most-- you're gonna be taking a lot of pictures with that in the background!! :) And if it's the Snugabunny and you want to entertain LO in it, you can always get a toy arch that you can take on and off. (It's pretty annoying to have the brightly colored toys waving wildly in the air when you're bouncing the chair trying to calm them down) </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756493 Thu, 02 May 2013 11:49:34 +0000 loveisstrange 756493@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>Get the Snuggabunny. LO loved ours. Its not necessarily for entertainment anyway. Get a swing or a playmat or something like that for that purpose. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756483 Thu, 02 May 2013 11:44:28 +0000 MamaMoose 756483@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I'd get the snugabunny. I think I remember you saying you are planning to get an activity mat so that will probably be a better place for baby to be entertained, and the bouncy seat can be more a chill spot. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/fisher-price-rainforest-vs-snugabunny-bouncer#post-756478 Thu, 02 May 2013 11:42:45 +0000 daniellemybelle 756478@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I am blowing up HB with registry questions!</p> <p>I am trying to decide between the Rainforest and Snugabunny bouncers. Both have great reviews. We're not getting a lot of "baby containers" so I do want our bouncer to be awesome (though who knows if LO will like it!)</p> <p>So far, this is what I have gathered: The Rainforest is very interactive and fun, so will occupy baby as he/she gets older. The Snugabunny looks so snuggly and comfy and is probably better for a younger baby. Both have similar vibration/bouncing options. The Snugabunny is a lot cuter looking and doesn't make annoying noises, so that's kind of a pro, but it could be boring for LO, so that's a con as well in a way.</p> <p>What say you? </p>