<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Hellobee Boards Topic: If you used Creighton model to chart...</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/</link>
<description>Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 12:39:17 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>LovelyPlum on "If you used Creighton model to chart..."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-you-used-creighton-model-to-chart#post-1098696</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LovelyPlum</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1098696@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@lovehoneybee:  I'm terrible, terrible with CP.  It literally never feels different.  And even when I did notice position, it was always if it happened to be low when I was already pregnant, which freaked me the heck out.  So no more CP for me...though no real need now :)  Anyways, we like Creighton because we got to work one-on-one with the woman who trained us to do it.  It taught me a lot about my cycles!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@LittleFox:  that's what I thought, too, that it's less confusing.  Except today, when I typed out &#34;DPO&#34; and confused myself :)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>lovehoneybee on "If you used Creighton model to chart..."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-you-used-creighton-model-to-chart#post-1098688</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lovehoneybee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1098688@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@LovelyPlum:  That's interesting! No, I used OPKs + BBT. I did check my CM/CP, but my CM was never really very good (I finally started using Pre-seed) so I'm not sure that I could have predicted ovulation based on it. (Or CP, because it always felt about the same to me ;)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LittleFox on "If you used Creighton model to chart..."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-you-used-creighton-model-to-chart#post-1098682</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LittleFox</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1098682@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I don't chart Creighton (I use CCL, but my instructors were very clear that we can't do an exact pinpoint of ovulation), but I also use O if talking online. It's less confusing to people who aren't as knowledgeable in a given method.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LovelyPlum on "If you used Creighton model to chart..."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-you-used-creighton-model-to-chart#post-1098677</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LovelyPlum</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1098677@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@lovehoneybee:  yeah, I think there are, or at least, Creighton is a little different than just temping/using FF.  Instead of estimating O day based on OPKs and confirming with temp, Creighton tracks CM, and you record those.  The last day of good &#34;peak type&#34; CM (so, either clear, stretchy over 1 inch, or lubricative) is peak day.  The research suggests that if you make good observations, almost all women will O in the three days following peak.  So, peak can be a few to 96 hours before O.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;In some ways, it's a little easier, because you don't have to use BBT.  We used temping as well, but mostly because my CM can be a little dicey.  But the peak window has always been true for me-I usually ovulated about 36-48 hours after peak.  And we used peak-1 and peak+1 this cycle with pretty good results :)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;ETA:  I guess before I typed that long spiel out, I should have asked-did you use Creighton?  Just generally curious how many people do.  I know there are a few bees on here that do.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>lovehoneybee on "If you used Creighton model to chart..."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-you-used-creighton-model-to-chart#post-1098649</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lovehoneybee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1098649@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I definitely said &#34;O&#34; and never &#34;peak&#34; but I didn't realize there were different models!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>LovelyPlum on "If you used Creighton model to chart..."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-you-used-creighton-model-to-chart#post-1098618</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LovelyPlum</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1098618@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;...do you find yourself saying &#34;O&#34; instead of &#34;peak&#34; when you talk about your charts online?  I do!  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I realized this afternoon when I typed &#34;12 DPO&#34; that I really meant &#34;peak plus 12.&#34;  It seems less confusing that way to people who don't chart using the exact same method.  But I guess it could also be more confusing, because peak day and O day aren't *exactly* the same thing.  If I'm not online, I do use &#34;peak&#34; when talking to DH or my doctor, though.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What do you do?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
