<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Hellobee Boards Topic: If your first LO was "large" at birth....</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/</link>
<description>Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:19:42 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>LuLu Mom on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2470222</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LuLu Mom</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2470222@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;First one was 8 lbs 10 oz - 5 days early&#60;br /&#62;
second one was 7 pounds 6 oz - 7 days early. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I gained about 20 pounds less with #2 and ate better as well, so a lot of it was me. I thought for sure i would have another huge baby though, it runs in my family. My second daughter was the smallest out of the 6 nieces/nephews.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>fussygal on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2470043</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fussygal</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2470043@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@oliviaoblivia:  Thanks! I'm hoping my second is similar to your second in size, too! Right now (36.5w) my doctor says that he feels &#34;slightly bigger than average&#34; but that it's hard to really tell, especially in taller women (he says we hide big babies better  :meh:  ). They're going to keep checking and might do an US around 38 weeks if thinks I'm feeling/measuring large (although I never measured large with DD either...), and then if they're really concerned they will schedule an induction for 39 weeks.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@Torchwood:  My DD is similar to your cousin in that she started off large (10 lb. 9oz at 40w2d) but is on the smaller side now. At her 18 month appointment was in the 25th percentile for height and weight (not due to a condition though)!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@gracecat:  The weight of our firsts were similar so I'm wondering if you felt as big with the second? I'm almost 37 weeks and I feel about the same which freaks me out a bit, but also it's hard to gauge because who doesn't feel huge at the end of their third trimester?! &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@mrsjyw:  Oh man, that is way off!  :shocked:
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>knittylady on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469878</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>knittylady</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469878@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;First was 9 lbs 1 oz.&#60;br /&#62;
Second was 8 lbs even, and I had GD during that pregnancy, so I credit the GD diet to his lower weight. I often wonder if I developed GD later in my pregnancy with DS1 than they test...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mrs.shinerbock on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469876</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mrs.shinerbock</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469876@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@fussygal:  the US were pretty accurate, but the also were at the maternal-fetal medicine specialist, not my OB.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ash on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469875</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469875@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@T.H.O.U.:  oh, under!!!! &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The only reason why my doctor ok'd my vbac and my delivery was horrendous because of her size.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>T.H.O.U. on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469871</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>T.H.O.U.</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469871@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@Ash:  Off by 2 pounds under or over? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;My OB also said that he would check for size around 34 weeks because after 36 weeks they run out of space and room to accurately get a good measurement.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ash on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469864</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469864@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;My first was 9#7oz at 41 weeks.&#60;br /&#62;
My second was 9#8oz at 40 weeks. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Ultrasound the day before was 2lbs off.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jill_a55 on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469863</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jill_a55</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469863@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Lo1 was 8lbs 5oz at 39weeks&#60;br /&#62;
Due with lo2 in 4 weeks and my dr swears he will be bigger. I just want him out sooner! I am doooooone. I feel bigger, but so far there hasn't been any talk of an early induction
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mrsjyw on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469861</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mrsjyw</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469861@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;8 lbs 11 oz @ 40w3d&#60;br /&#62;
8 lbs even @ 38w&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I carried smaller and gained less the second time but still had pretty similar sized babies. Eta: a resident did a growth us when I was in labor and told me ds2 was measuring 5.5lbs.... Good thing I know from ds1 that likely wasn't the case!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>T.H.O.U. on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469845</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>T.H.O.U.</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469845@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;A baby diagnosed with fetal macrosomia has a birth weight of more than 8 pounds, 13 ounces (4,000 grams), regardless of his or her gestational age.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;LGA babies have birthweights greater than the 90th percentile for their gestational age, meaning that they weigh more than 90 percent of all babies of the same gestational age.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Finfan on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469800</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Finfan</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469800@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;First was 9 pounds 5 ounces at 40w5d. Second was 9pounds 10 ounces at 39weeks. Since my first was so large, I was tested for GD in the first trimester with my second pregnancy, in addition to the third trimester. I did not have it either time. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I also had size estimate ultrasounds at 32 and 36 weeks (they compared measurements) with my second pregnancy. Their size prediction was bang on (high 9 pounds). My OB said if they predicted a baby would be 10 pounds, they would offer me an elective C-section and if she was predicted to be 11, they would strongly encourage it. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;For reference, my doc said their threshold for big is 8 pounds 10 ounces at term. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I asked about induction and she said they would not do one for size concerns alone before 40w as long as everything else looked fine. I did have an emergency C-section after 3 hours of pushing with my second as she would not budge. My first was a vaginal delivery without a vaccum assist or anything like that.  &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I did feel a lot bigger this time but my pregnancy was actually easier. And the baby weighed more (especially for coming almost 2 weeks earlier) but was 1.5 inches shorter.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>lovehoneybee on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469725</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lovehoneybee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469725@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;LO1: 8lb,12oz @39w5d&#60;br /&#62;
LO2: 7lb,12oz @38w
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Adira on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469701</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 07:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Adira</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469701@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;First: 8 lbs 14 oz @ 39+1&#60;br /&#62;
Second: 8 lbs 8 oz @ 37+4
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>oliviaoblivia on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469691</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 07:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>oliviaoblivia</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469691@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@fussygal:  my ultrasounds were very accurate for my first two, but my third was underestimated by a pound.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>misolee on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469688</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 07:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>misolee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469688@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;LO1- 8 lbs 9 oz at 41 +1 w&#60;br /&#62;
LO2- 7lbs 3oz at 38 weeks
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>T.H.O.U. on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469682</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>T.H.O.U.</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469682@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;39 weeks 9 lbs 7oz - officially LGA&#60;br /&#62;
39w 8d 9lb 3oz - just under LGA cut off. Had an extra GD test but was fine.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>gracecat on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469676</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gracecat</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469676@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;43 weeks - 10 lbs 8 oz&#60;br /&#62;
38.5 weeks - 8 lbs&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;My ultrasounds leading up were right on point.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Andrea on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469675</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469675@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;8 lbs 5 oz at 40 weeks 4 days&#60;br /&#62;
9 lbs 5 oz at 40 weeks 1 day
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Torchwood on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469663</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 02:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Torchwood</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469663@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm interested in this. LO was 5lb7oz at 33 weeks. The midwives were questioning whether I got my dates wrong (I didn't). So how big might she have been at term?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;My cousin's first was bigger (9lb I think) and second was small (7?). Interestingly, the first has a disease that causes nutritional issues, and is now off the charts small for his age at 5yo, but the second is growing so fast she's jumping curves at 2mo.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>oliviaoblivia on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469657</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>oliviaoblivia</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469657@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;First was 10lbs 1oz at 40w0d&#60;br /&#62;
Second was 8lbs 10oz (peanut!) at 39w4d&#60;br /&#62;
Third was 10lbs 12oz at 38w4d&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;No rhyme or reason here. I know how big your first was so for your sake I'm hoping #2 is like my second.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I got extra monitoring with 2&#38;amp;3 but no red flags. I did an extra GD test with 3 but my bloods were perfect.&#60;br /&#62;
My first was induced for reasons other than size but ended up a c-section. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Second and third were repeat sections. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Third was delivered early because I got pregnant too soon after my second, not because of size. I don't want to think about how big she'd have been ten days later.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>fussygal on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469655</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fussygal</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469655@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;@HLK208:  @mrs.shinerbock:  Thanks! Were the extra ultrasounds pretty accurate?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>HLK208 on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469654</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>HLK208</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469654@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I had GD and I was told DS would be between 8-8lbs. He was 8lbs 7oz. My second and third were 8lbs 13oz and 8lbs 5oz. I was monitored with extra ultrasounds and I had to watch what I ate closely. I only had to be induced with my second for high blood pressure.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>coopsmama on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469652</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>coopsmama</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469652@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;First was 9lbs, 3oz at a couple of days late. I was induced at 42 weeks with my second and baby was 8lbs, 13oz.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mrs.shinerbock on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469651</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mrs.shinerbock</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469651@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;LO1 was 8lb 12oz at 39 weeks.&#60;br /&#62;
LO2 was 9lb 6oz at 38 weeks. I had several additional US and had to do GD testing early because of concern for LO2's size.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boogs on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469648</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Boogs</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469648@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;First was large at a couple ounces shy of 9lbs at 2 weeks early. Second was a week early and weighed basically 9lbs and they didn't talk induction or anything.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>fussygal on "If your first LO was "large" at birth...."</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/if-your-first-lo-had-a-large-birth-weight#post-2469645</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fussygal</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2469645@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;...how big was you second (or third, fourth, etc.)?&#60;br /&#62;
Did you feel as big/bigger with subsequent pregnancies? Were you monitored more closely and/or encouraged to induce early?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I know everyone has a different opinion on what &#34;large&#34; is so I'm not putting a minimum  :happy:
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
