<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Hellobee Boards Topic: Were your Braxton Hicks a good predictor of labor?</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/</link>
<description>Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 22:32:22 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>GrapeCrush on "Were your Braxton Hicks a good predictor of labor?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/were-your-braxton-hicks-a-good-predictor-of-labor#post-295506</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>GrapeCrush</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">295506@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;if i had 5 BH over my entire pregnancy that was a lot...so no i didn't :o)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Honeybee on "Were your Braxton Hicks a good predictor of labor?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/were-your-braxton-hicks-a-good-predictor-of-labor#post-295480</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Honeybee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">295480@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I never thought of it, but yes, there was some correlation!  My BH contractions were always much closer together than &#34;textbook,&#34; like 5 minutes apart or closer.  With both of my births, I started at at 2 minute long contractions, 1 minute apart, so again, much closer than &#34;textbook&#34; early/active labor contractions.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MusicaV on "Were your Braxton Hicks a good predictor of labor?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/were-your-braxton-hicks-a-good-predictor-of-labor#post-294414</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MusicaV</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">294414@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm not in real labor yet, but I've been having contractions that sort of last for hours - I'll have a contraction, but my uterus won't relax all the way, then I'll have another contraction on top of that, and again it relaxes some but not all the way. This happened for about three hours this morning! Luckily they're not painful yet.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beyond2 on "Were your Braxton Hicks a good predictor of labor?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/were-your-braxton-hicks-a-good-predictor-of-labor#post-293408</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Beyond2</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">293408@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I have braxton hicks contractions that last for quite a while, upwards of 5 minutes isn't uncommon.  At my last midwife appt, she couldn't even feel the baby because my uterus wouldn't stop contracting.  I'm starting to wonder if this will correlate to very long contractions during labor?  Did you notice any correlation between your BH and labor contractions?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
