https://boards.hellobee.com/ Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee en Mon, 27 Apr 2026 22:21:26 +0000 https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19711 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:06:39 +0000 LivsMama 19711@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@momentspassslow: I had a completely different experience than you did with my recovery. Mine was cake. I was up and walking about 11 hours later, managed the pain with Motrin or Advil, and felt 100% by about 6 weeks. Id say I felt about 95% by 4 weeks. I dont know the circumstances behind yours, but since mine was elective I didnt labor at all and wasnt breech, both of which I hear can make recovery more difficult.</p> <p>I do agree that it is a MAJOR surgery, but for me, it was absolutely better than the alternative. That being said, like I said earlier in this thread, I dont agree with taking them early unless its medically necessary. But to each their own I guess</p> <p>ETA - Holy cow! I just checked out your blog, Baby Boy is SOOOOOO CUTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19471 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:31:24 +0000 momentspassslow 19471@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I won't tell you what to do or how to handle your own delivery - but in my case I had an unwanted c-section and the recovery is just awful. (I am well aware that recovery from a vaginal delivery can be difficult too.) It is a major, MAJOR surgery. Things are cut that should not be cut. Your body is put through hell. I just, personally, don't understand why you would electively put yourself through it. Just my two cents. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19459 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:06:10 +0000 runsyellowlites 19459@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@looch: This too! DH and I were trying so we "knew" when we conceived, BUT our u/s dated us not quite as far along as we "knew" we were.</p> <p>So even when it's planned there could be some discrepancy on "when" conception occurred and "when" baby is ready, </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19456 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:00:14 +0000 looch 19456@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>Another thing to consider is that the dating of pregnancies isn't always black and white. Sometimes the date of conception is off by a week and there is even debate as to how many weeks is considered to be full term. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19449 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:51:40 +0000 Mrsbells 19449@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>yeah like many other posters i have to disgaree with the OP, have elective c-section/ induction before 39 weeks shouldnt be your choice. Its best for the baby to stay in until the full term unless there are complications that force the baby to be removed earlier than 39 weeks... I dont see why a mother would want to have a c-section at 36 weeks or 37 weeks. I think anyone getting pregnant should be ready to commit to the full 40 weeks of pregnancy. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19442 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:41:17 +0000 Mrs. Sunglasses 19442@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I think that if it's not a medical emergency then I don't see why you get to choose when your baby arrives. I mean, I wanted my son out by 38 weeks because I was fed up and by week 41 i was induced. </p> <p>Sure the last few weeks weren't fun, but who am I to decide when I want my child when it can be done "naturally" (which is the route I was planning on taking anyway) </p> <p>C-Sections, shouldn't be taken lightly and I feel it's become like any other plastic surgery (when you don't need to get a c-section I mean) it seems easier for everyone so why not do it. </p> <p>I'm against it and am all for your body prepping for labour. Again, I am not talking about emergency c-sections and in my sister's instance she had no choice but to have a c-section ... but if you don't need it, you shouldn't have the option. (unless the doctor feels the baby won't go through etc) </p> <p>That's my two-cents and I'm sure alot of people will disagree. I just don't understand people who want c-sections because it means it won't change their body or vagina. I mean, you decided to have a child... deal with it (and everything that comes with it) </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19427 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:28:51 +0000 runsyellowlites 19427@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@Navy_Mommy: Exactly. My issue is more with the Doctors that aren't upholding the oath that they took and we're clearly seeing the negative consequences from it.</p> <p>Only thing is it's on US...... our babies and our mommas that are being harmed from it. Most doctors (if honest) would tell you that a cesarean unless absolutely medically necessary is riskier short term AND long term for both momma and baby. Knowing that though you have to wonder WHY we have such a high cesarean rate...... aren't our doctors supposed to be doing the safest job for the healthiest and best outcomes? =/ </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19416 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:22:11 +0000 Navy_Mommy 19416@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@runsyellowlites: I'd also like to add, not even the best doctor can know for sure that a baby is ready to be born before you are full term. They can't see that the lungs, etc are fully developed until the baby is out. So they may be PRETTY sure that the baby is ready, but they can't be 100%. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19392 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:05:12 +0000 runsyellowlites 19392@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@MsMamaBear: I agree with that as well..... other than the fact that these bans are because of doctors that HAVE been okay with doing these early elective cesareans and organizations like the cdc, who, acog, and such are showing that it is infact detrimental. And sadly doctors actually risk less suite issues if they perform cesareans than if they do vaginal deliveries.</p> <p>It's the same with looking at our infant &amp; maternal mortality rates linked to early &amp; excessive use of "term" cesareans.... I mean it's not like patients are performing them on themselves. It's Doctors who should be looking out for the best benefit of their patients that are compromising and doing them either for convenience or monetary purposes... and statistics are showing that it's more prevalent than not =/</p> <p>It's sad that because of the doctors that are performing these procedures aren't taking the stance &amp; responsible approach that they should that the hospitals are having to implement policies to make them. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19377 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:43:39 +0000 Maysprout 19377@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>There's increased rates of infant morbidity before 39 weeks so it makes sense that a hospital wouldn't want to perform that procedure without a medical reason. There is no ban, just many hospitals are deciding it's not best practice to perform an early c-section. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19230 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:47:06 +0000 MsMamaBear 19230@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@ecogirl:" because I feel that any decent doctor will not endanger lives and open themselves to malpractice suits willingly." </p> <p>Agree. I often wonder WHERE these doctors are that just let patients endanger their babies?? </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-19226 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:41:41 +0000 MsMamaBear 19226@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@ecogirl: I agree with the "doubt they've given birth yet" LOL</p> <p>I listened to my doctor. I doubt people on the internet could have given me the info I needed. Especially those who have never HAD a c-section. (I had to have one at 39wks, water broke and her heart was in distress, then come to find out she was breech too.LOL) As long as the doctor is fine with it, it's up to the person. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-18857 Sun, 20 Nov 2011 13:43:40 +0000 tessabella76 18857@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I don't agree with elective c-sections or early elective inductions. With all the potential negative problems for both mom and baby, I really don't understand why anyone would do it. I think the baby and the body know best when they are ready to deliver, barring any complications.</p> <p> However, it is your body, your baby, and your decision. No one should tell you what can or cannot do to your body. As long as you're informed and prepared to deal with any potential negative affects, you should do whatever you feel is best. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-18840 Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:55:46 +0000 looch 18840@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@Beeofservice: that was very well said. I think you've hit the nail on the head. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-18821 Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:02:34 +0000 ecogirl 18821@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>Thank you @Beeofservice that was very eloquent and encouraging :) </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections/page/2#post-18588 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:49:38 +0000 SweetMamaM 18588@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>It's interesting to read this - down here in NZ, elective C-Section probably exist but they appear to be very rare. I've had friends who have had c-sections but it has usually been at their due date, with the majority of those being due to labour failing to progress (for a whole multitude of reasons).<br /> I think everyone is entitled to make decisions on their own body but I understand that the legislation is probably there to protect women who aren't as educated and supported in their decision as Ecogirl... as is often the case, rules are put in place to protect and assist the many rather than the few. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18582 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:16:39 +0000 MH.Abroad 18582@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@MsMini: Thanks for your insight! It's good to hear from someone who has experienced it firsthand. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18581 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:14:46 +0000 MsMini 18581@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I work in NICU, and in my hospital that means I attend c-section deliveries. There is a huge difference in the babies born by c-section at 38 vs 40 weeks, and an even bigger difference between babies born without labour, and those who experience labour.<br /> I usually feel terribly bad for babies who are born via scheduled section who don't experience labour, because they almost always come out so stunned and stressed looking. Labour tells the baby to prepare for something to happen, and causes the baby to release hormones to assist that transition, and without experiencing labour they have a way more difficult time transitioning to life in the world outside the uterus.<br /> Our hospital has banned scheduled c-section until 38 weeks, unless medically indicated (ie an issue with mom or baby that necessitates birth before 38 weeks to achieve the best outcome). It was a great decision by the hospital, because though 36 weeks and up is technically "term" you do see a lot more of those 36/37 weekers end up with longer stays or re-admission to the hospital due to failure to thrive/feeding issues/jaundice. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18532 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:14:59 +0000 ecogirl 18532@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@MHAbroad no need to apologize if you feel strongly about something. Whether or not someone calls me selfish isn't offensive to me unless I have a relationship with the person. I respect different opinions :) </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18518 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:10:12 +0000 LivsMama 18518@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>This proposed ban is also on inductions before 39 weeks. Not just elective c's. Same rationale though. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18507 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:38:17 +0000 MH.Abroad 18507@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@ecogirl: I'm very sorry if that felt like a personal attack, it wasn't meant to be.</p> <p>You did ask what people thought, and I felt like it was an important issue that I needed to pipe up on.</p> <p>I just feel like your body and your baby knows when it's ready, and doctors (while generally correct and trustworthy) still have a substantial margin of error. Doctors make mistakes, and babies face the consequences. I'd just rather not take the risk.</p> <p>A baby I know was born via elective c-section at 38 weeks after the doctor insisted it would be fine. His lungs were underdeveloped, and he had issues with his blood count that required a transfusion. He had to stay in the hospital for quite some time and was in high danger of infection.</p> <p>While you obviously can't base a decision on ONE story, this isn't just one story. It's medical fact, it's proven science that every week counts.</p> <p>Of course everything may be fine and perfect, but your chances of a perfect ending are higher the longer you wait. So why NOT wait? </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18498 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:28:43 +0000 ecogirl 18498@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@MH.Abroad I see that you feel strongly about it but I will trust my doctor as I said and will have my c section before 39 weeks as requested. My baby will be fine as my last one was and as my doctor has assured me this one will be too. My baby will be ready or fully cooked as I saw someone here call it :) </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18496 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:24:53 +0000 MH.Abroad 18496@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I really don't mean to be rude, I just don't understand the reasoning. Unless there is a medical reason to bring your child into the world before it's due, why would you risk the chance of hurting your child? To me, it really seems to simply be about convenience, which is incredibly selfish. Correct me if I'm wrong, and there is a better reason for rushing your baby. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18495 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:22:27 +0000 MH.Abroad 18495@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@zippylef: Exactly.<br /> If you want to have an elective c-section, that's your own business. But having one before 39 weeks when there is no medical reason for it, is wrong! Why would you risk your baby's health for convenience or because you're "tired of being pregnant"?<br /> If you can't wait until your baby is ready, then maybe you have adopted or tried surrogacy. Pregnancy is not about your comfort, it's about the health of your baby. Reserve your "right to choose" between vaginal or c-section, just wait until your baby is ready for the world. If you love your baby which I'm sure you do, then you want what's best for it. And waiting until it's ready to be born is certainly what's best for it. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18493 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:16:05 +0000 ecogirl 18493@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>For my situation it will be before 39 weeks and my doctor feels totally comfortable and so do I. My other was born the same way but not because I was bored of being pregnant or anything. Due dates are often wrong and with my busy husband I know exactly when we've had sex every time ;) He travels oversees all of the time for business so our time together is sparse. I realize many women don't know exactly when they have gotten pregnant but I surely do each time :) As I said, my doctor is good with it and has a stellar reputation (as he should with the money we're paying) and I know he wouldn't want to sully that. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18492 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:11:41 +0000 loveisstrange 18492@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@ecogirl: You did read that they are banning them before 39 weeks and not banning them altogether, right? AND it's not legislation, it's the hospitals banning it themselves. You can still choose an elective c-section, you just have to wait until your due date now. How is that not letting women choose how they want to birth? You still have a choice. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18487 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:02:02 +0000 ecogirl 18487@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>Scary story Zippylef! That is the type of situation where the doctor assessed the situation and said no because there was a health risk and I think that is good. I do believe that people were hinting that I am selfish though with their responses. I don't really care that they think that but I did want to address that by saying my doctor knows best for me and my family and I chose him from the finest due to his great reputation. I trust him and my instincts as well. I think this ban is terrible still because I feel that any decent doctor will not endanger lives and open themselves to malpractice suits willingly. I do understand peoples concern about it but for me it is too much legislation I guess. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18482 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:57:41 +0000 loveisstrange 18482@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@ecogirl: I trust my doctor too, but I trust my instincts more. *shrug* It's a personal decision and I do honestly believe that some women endanger their children by acting selfishly in regards to this. I am not saying that ALL women do, I am saying that there are definitely some that do.</p> <p>I know a girl who started begging the doctor to strip her membranes at 34 weeks. 34 WEEKS. She had no medical reason for wanting it done, the baby was still safely cooking... she was just tired of being pregnant. THAT is what I mean by selfish. That poor baby could have been very premature if the doctor involved hadn't put her foot down. </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18477 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:39:53 +0000 mrbee 18477@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>@ecogirl: I love and trust my doctor too... but not totally! I've found that many doctors don't keep up to date on the latest scientific research. Understandable, since the job of a doctor is very hard and with long hours! </p> https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/what-do-you-think-of-the-new-ban-on-elective-early-c-sections#post-18475 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:36:58 +0000 Red 18475@https://boards.hellobee.com/ <p>I'm not opposed to elective c-sections, just EARLY (before 39 weeks) elective c-sections since there's still so much development that goes on in those last few weeks. </p> <p>BTW, my husband's birthday is on Dec 26th and while it kinda sucked as a kid, he loves it now cause he can take the whole week off and enjoy it with family. </p>