<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Hellobee Boards Topic: what's considered "standard" changing pad dimension?</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/</link>
<description>Pregnancy, Baby and Parenting blog, by Hellobee</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 19:46:06 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>tequiero21 on "what's considered "standard" changing pad dimension?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/whats-considered-standard-changing-pad-dimension#post-49020</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tequiero21</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">49020@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;thanks, ladies.... i decided the naturepedic is too expensive and  probably not worth it. so going with the colgate 3-sided contour changing pad, which is 33 x 16 x 4 and more than half the cost.....
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>heffalump on "what's considered "standard" changing pad dimension?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/whats-considered-standard-changing-pad-dimension#post-48954</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>heffalump</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">48954@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I agree, I think standard should work fine. I have two &#34;standard&#34; covers and they're actually completely different sizes, but both fit. One's just a little bit bigger.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>pelikila on "what's considered "standard" changing pad dimension?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/whats-considered-standard-changing-pad-dimension#post-48950</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pelikila</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">48950@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I would venture to say standard is 16x32; however, you'll very likely be fine with standard covers.  They usually have some wiggle room since some pads are shorter and wider and some are longer and skinnier.  Since that changing pad is very contoured compared to some others, perhaps you'll want a tighter fit so then I'd suggest you get the one made for it but you might have to get one of both and see what you like and return what you don't want.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>tequiero21 on "what's considered "standard" changing pad dimension?"</title>
<link>https://boards.hellobee.com/topic/whats-considered-standard-changing-pad-dimension#post-48782</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 19:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tequiero21</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">48782@https://boards.hellobee.com/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;naturepedic changing pad measures 16.5 x 33 x 4. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;some changing covers i'm looking at says they fit the &#34;standard changing pad&#34;.... what's considered standard? i've seen them at 16 x 32 x 4..... or 16.5 x 32 x 4. am i worried about nothing? will the standard changing pad cover fit the naturepedic?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
