A debate with a friend got me wondering...
Please explain your answer!
A debate with a friend got me wondering...
Please explain your answer!
162 votes
bananas / 9229 posts
They don't bother me but I don't automatically equate tattoos with professionalism. I do think they should typically be covered in an office environment though. Like no sleeveless top if you have a tattoo sleeve. I see wrist, foot and ankle tattoos all the time though.
hostess / wonderful persimmon / 25556 posts
If someone came in for an interview and had visible tattoos, I would be put off. I wouldn't necessarily think they will do a bad job but I would question their judgement on getting tattoos in a place that is visible when wearing professional attire.. First impressions are a big deal.
nectarine / 2521 posts
I chose option two, but I think there is a big difference between a tasteful, small tattoo being visible, and then neck/face tattoos. Those are automatic "job killers" in my mind.
bananas / 9628 posts
i draw the line at facial tattoos. I have tattoos and one of them is on my wrist, I describe its placement as unapologetic because there's no covering it (though I'll be required to when I start clinicals for school, hoping they change the policy first though). Most professional attire would cover most tattoos, I think as long as they're not offensive- hate symbols, graphic nudity, offensive language, etc, then I think it's not a big deal, but I think it's something you need to consider before getting one because not everyone feels that way & depending on the person hiring you & their feelings on them, they can hurt your chances of getting a position over a candidate who doesn't have any.
GOLD / wonderful apricot / 22276 posts
They don't bother me. My husband has tattoos and it has never affected anything for him.
ETA: but they are on his arms so can be covered.
pineapple / 12526 posts
I chose option 2, but I think that it depends on the location and what the tattoo is. I myself have tattoos, but none are visible in clothing I would wear to work.
nectarine / 2079 posts
I do think there are taste levels when it comes to tattoos, so it is hard to make a blanket statement. I also think that it is one small item to consider in a much larger package and if everything else were in line a tattoo would be a lesser deal than if the person had other flaws that you could group the tattoo(s) into.
cantaloupe / 6206 posts
I also think answers will depend on people's professions! ie "traditional" office environment vs. retail vs. food services vs. hospital.... I think there are varying levels of acceptance. In my world, which is professional/traditional office environments, tattoos tend not to go over well during hiring.
I also think it's generational... ie the HB readership is average age 26-30 or so.. poll the 50+ crowd (often the ones making the hiring decisions) and the results will likely be different
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
I didn't realize I had such complicated views on the topic until I started to try to draft a response. I think it varies on content, location of tatoo and the type of work.
wonderful pea / 17279 posts
Visible tattoos are distracting. Visible tattoos do not enhance the way a person looks in business casual or business professional attire. I don't think the person is less competent to perform the tasks they have been hired to do. However, I may question their judgment because the tattoo is visible I get to see what the tattoo they chose.
pomelo / 5258 posts
I just hired a woman with a sleeve (and who knows what else). It was covered in her interview but clearly visible on Facebook. I assumed her tattoos would make an appearance from time to time and they have. I don't want her showing her whole arm during presentations but I assume since she covered up for the interview she has some sense to do that in the future.
I find it less professional when I am exposed to lower back tattoos. There is a lot of bending and reaching in my job so I see quite a few of those. I just don't want to see your backside tattoo or no tattoo.
wonderful grape / 20453 posts
I don't think tattoos are a big deal, but if they're all over hands, wrist, face, neck, in abundance, it simply doesn't look professional (referring to a traditional office environment). But a wrist tattoo or something on your leg? No biggie.
I read an article yesterday about this teacher who is upset the Catholic school she got hired on to finish her internship (as a teacher) wanted her to cover her tattoos and piercings.
GOLD / watermelon / 14076 posts
I think if they're visible with a short-sleeve button-down or short-sleeve blouse and slacks then they are unprofessional. Not everyone works in a professional environment, though, so it just depends on the job. And size matters, too....I don't think a small one on the wrist is necessarily unprofessional, but if it's big enough to catch someone's attention/be distracting then yes, I think that's unprofessional. I wouldn't automatically assume someone with tattoos is going to do a bad job, though.
bananas / 9628 posts
@blackbird: when I was a student working in public schools, I was required to remove facial piercings, they can be distracting, I get that. There have been teachers fired from catholic schools for being visibly pregnant out of wedlock after being raped, others for having IVF, it's not exactly an accepting environment, I wouldn't expect them to be keen on teachers with body art. They should have made her aware before hiring her though that was an expectation
GOLD / wonderful olive / 19030 posts
They don't bother me, however I can admit I may judge when I see a neck/face/or a "titty" tattoo. I think it's poor judgement when you get a neck/face tattoo and a tattoo showing on ones chest looks trashy, since it's in an area that can be covered up.
That being said I work in an extremely professional place and have a tattoo that is visible on my foot depending on footwear. I do not cover it up, but did wear shoes that covered it in my interview just to be safe.
pineapple / 12802 posts
heh. I work in a professional environment and I have visible tattoos on my wrist and leg. I'll probably eventually get more that are visible, while wearing clothing, as well.
I personally think it depends on the people and workplace. If there is an over abundance of them on your hands, face, neck, then it's probably considered unprofessional.
However, I find that people with these types of tattoo's generally don't go apply to be a lawyer or doctor or business man, either.
I don't think they're a big deal and I would hire someone with visible tattoos to do my job as long as they dressed themselves within the dress code and were professional in their mannerisms.
Ultimately, you get tattoos, you deal with the consequences of having them, and that means sometimes people won't hire you for the job. But, if you won't hire me because of my tattoos I bet I wouldn't want to work for you anyway.
wonderful grape / 20453 posts
@mrs. bird: the article says she was made aware and now the issue is that she doesn't want to cover up, despite knowing the policy. *shrug*
pomelo / 5257 posts
Hmm, this is a tough one. I don't have any tattoos and don't plan on getting any. But I'm not bothered by other people's tattoos -- your body, your choice. HOWEVER, I do think, like in cases such as the one @blackbird shared, if your employer wants you to cover up tattoos or take out piercings, that's their prerogative. If you don't want to comply, that's your prerogative, you can work somewhere else. I mean I would love to wear pajamas to work every day, but I understand that my office requires a certain kind of dress so I don't
grapefruit / 4355 posts
I don't really think tattoos (especially large ones) should be visual in a professional environment. But I don't think that someone will be any worse at a given job because they have tattoos.
grapefruit / 4120 posts
I agree with @mrs. bird. There are tattoos, and there are tattoos. A guy in my old neighborhood had a shaved head and a checkerboard tattooed all over his entire face and head. Someone would not do that if they didn't want people constantly staring. That sort of thing is not appropriate for most workplaces.
pomegranate / 3244 posts
My husband is a tattoo artist so visible tattoos are expected in his workplace He has a LOT of tattoos (full sleeves, back, some on his chest & legs), but he did make sure that they could be covered by wearing long-sleeve shirts--nothing below the wrists, nothing above the collar line. You'd never know he had so many tattoos if you saw him walking down the street since he normally wears jeans and button-down shirts!!
I work in a more professional environment and few of my coworkers have visible tattoos. If they did it wouldn't bother me, but I probably have a higher tolerance after living with my husband for so long
papaya / 10473 posts
Depends on the workplace for me - I know a caterer who has a full sleeve, my hairstylist has tons, and the guitar player at our church has a full sleeve that is Narnia themed. Most of the cops my husband works with (and surprisingly enough, most people in the ministry he works in) have tattoos. I don't mind at all.
I mind stuff like face tattoos, tattoos that are lewd, that kind of stuff.
persimmon / 1313 posts
I don't care either way but it's interesting to see the cultural shift on tattoos. In corporate offices, there are still strict rules on tattoos but I've noticed in a lot of retail, restaurants, and schools even that visible tattoos are a lot more tolerated.
cantaloupe / 6164 posts
Like others have said, I like them personally. Appropriateness depends on the profession and location of the tattoo. In an office setting, I think face tattoos are a bit distracting.
pomegranate / 3105 posts
I have many tattoos, including one on the back of my neck. I don't have issues with tattoos, though ones on the face bug me a little bit, regardless of work.
I do work in a professional environment and some of them are visible, but I always make a conscious effort to wear my hair down/cover them up when meeting with clients.
I, personally, don't care if employees have tattoos, as long as they aren't racist/etc. and would think in today's society that someone's work ethic is more important than the life choices they make outside of the office.
coconut / 8472 posts
I work in an office, but it's for a start up software company. So, a little more relaxed and casual (depending on your job function). The presence of tattoos wouldn't bother me as much as prevalence and location. The teacher above? That seems like too much. A small tattoo on the wrist/foot/ankle? Eh.
@JoJoGirl: I'm 36 and I'm heavily involved in the hiring for my team ;). Software companies tend to run younger, I'm not sure there's more than a couple people that even work here that are over 50.
honeydew / 7622 posts
To me it depends on the industry, as well as what you consider professional. M has visible tattoos on his upper arms, and it's no big deal, but if he wears a suit you can't see them.
I'm a photographer and have one large tattoo on my side, but could have as many as I wanted. But I don't exactly work in a 'professional' environment.
I agree with face and neck tattoos, it think it limits job choices. Which is why I chose the second option.
I live in the Portland area and when I travel I am stunned how many people are not tattooed and pierced, even in places as close as Seattle and San Fransisco. Here it is really normal, but I think it can be overdone, sometimes I cringe to think what my generation locally will look like as they age.
pear / 1563 posts
I am an attorney and have several large tattoos that could be visible in some business casual wear. I keep them covered in the office because I feel like it's not really professional to have them visible. To me its more like a piece of my personality that doesn't fit the office, like I wouldn't wear a slogan on a shirt or politcal button. I have no problem showing them outside the office. I would never expose them at an interview. I don't think people should judge my work ability based on them but I understand some people might, but such is life.
cantaloupe / 6206 posts
@ShootingStar: Hahha, I'm also 36 and have also been heavily involved in hiring in the past (which I guess is why I think your appearance matters during interviews) - but the decision was always made WITH a my 50-year old manager, who was much more conservative about these things.
eggplant / 11408 posts
It depends on where they are and what they are of. It also depends on the office setting. I dislike tattoos generally, but I realize that lots of people have them. I do have to question face and/or knuckle tattoos in a business professional environment, though.
papaya / 10343 posts
So here is what I think is interesting. 89 votes (so far) and not a single person thinks having a tattoo means you will be worse at your job than if you did not have said tattoo. The worst that has been said about these tattooed ppl is that they may have poor judgment... Because they should know that other ppl may not like their tattoos.
So my question is-- why are they still a problem? Seems like circular logic. Having a visible tattoo is bad bc it shows poor judgement bc ppl think having tattoos shows poor judgment. But if we all agree the tattoo gun does not actually sap a persons ability to do their job, why is it still a topic of conversation? If we all just got over it and stopped calling them unprofessional, they'd no longer be unprofessional!
Obviously there are exceptions for vulgar tattoos, but that's the same as someone wearing a shirt with a vulgar expression or making a vulgar statement upon saying hello. Not the presence of the tattoo but the choice of content.
eggplant / 11408 posts
@Revel: that's a really good comparison between political buttons/slogan t-shirts at work. In some places, you would never dream of wearing those; in others, you would, either for a special occasion, or everyday in a more casual setting. I think I agree with that!
cantaloupe / 6206 posts
@Mae: I'm just going to make my point here too That I think it's the same as wearining a ratty t shirt and ripped jeans to work. No, it doesn't affect your ability to do your job. But if you were going in for surgery and your surgeon was wearing a tank top with cigarette burns and cut off jeans and had a mohawk, you wouldn't take pause for a second? I just think aesthetic things that are outside cultural "norms" in the workplace are not going to fall into the category of "professional" (ie, traditional office environment - the only work I can speak to) even if the person is the best at their job in the world.
cantaloupe / 6692 posts
I love tattoos (although I don't have any myself) personally but large or highly visible tattoos hinder professionalism to me. Small ones in obscure but visible places though? Sure.
I just think if you want a large tattoo in a highly visible area (neck, hands, face, forearms) it is your responsibility to consider your future in a career or job. Employers shouldn't have to accommodate your choices (if they are professional settings that require cover ups).
pineapple / 12802 posts
@Mae: I don't think people who get face tattoos have poor judgement but I do think they need to be prepared for the consequences of their actions. If they're cool with not working in a professional industry, go get all the face tattoos you want!
I think the reason they're still so controversial is because they are a distraction. It's really hard to take someone seriously when they have a teddy bear tattooed on their face and their job is to win a case to keep you out of jail. ya know?
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
Well, what's a "professional" job? Aren't some sports stars and entertainers considered professional? Or do we mean professional in the sense of office job of some sort?
papaya / 10343 posts
@JoJoGirl: lol I know I'm fighting a losing battle here but I was curious. And I think my pov will win out... Eventually. maybe it's the lawyer in me but I find "bc that's the way it is" impossible to accept when faced with issues that make no logical sense to me.
hostess / wonderful apple seed / 16729 posts
I think it depends on your job, how visible the tattoos are and what is it of.
I've known some very professional people who have tattoo sleeves.
I have one on my wrist and showed my BIL recently and he asked me why I would even think of getting one there. I told him that I can cover it up with my watch and it's hardly noticeable.
If someone doesn't give me the job because of the heart tattoo on my wrist, then I don't want to be working for them anyway.
Oh, I work in a lab and my work attire is casual so t-shirt and jeans are normal in my department. Having a tattoo is not going to make me unprofessional all of a sudden.
cantaloupe / 6206 posts
@Mae: I see this like something like.. gay marriage... or how "society" felt about interracial marriage 50 years ago. Many older folks are still like WTF uncomfortable with it because it's still new to them. Many younger folks don't give a shit. In 30 years nobody will care (I think). I think tattoos may go the same way.. they may eventually BECOME a cultural norm, but that doesn't change the fact that they aren't now.
Today | Monthly Record | |
---|---|---|
Topics | 0 | 1 |
Posts | 1 | 3 |
Ask for Help
Make a Suggestion
Frequently Asked Questions
Bee Levels
Acronyms
Most Viewed Posts
Hellobee Gold
Hellobee Recipes
Hellobee Features
Hellobee Contests
Baby-led Weaning
Bento Boxes
Breastfeeding
Newborn Essentials
Parties
Postpartum Care Essentials
Sensory Play Activities
Sleep Training
Starting Solids Gear
Transitioning to Toddler Bed
All Series
Who We Are
About the Bloggers
About the Hostesses
Contributing Bloggers
Apply to Blog
Apply to Hostess
Submit a Guest Blog
Hellobee Buttons
How We Make Money
Community Policies