Hellobee Boards

Login/Register

What would you rather - high tax/high government support or low tax/make your own way?

  1. Navy_Mommy

    nectarine / 2458 posts

    @Adira: I don't believe that having children means you have zero options.

  2. yoursilverlining

    eggplant / 11824 posts

    @looch and @mamag: yeah, that was clearly some members have unresolved issues with their upbringing. Train wreck territory.

  3. JoJoGirl

    cantaloupe / 6206 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: What I hear from your story is this: your husband *managed* to survive, which i would say puts him in the extreme minority. It only furthers my belief that there should have been some kind of social support network for him so he didn't HAVE to 'do it himself'. That's crap. Someone should've been there to take care of him and all the other kids in his situation who end up dead or in jail instead of successful.

  4. ms.line

    pear / 1770 posts

    @looch: @yoursilverlining: @mamag Yeah, that was something else! *smh*

  5. Navy_Mommy

    nectarine / 2458 posts

    @JoJoGirl: his parents made bad decisions. He was left with a shitty Foster family who abused THAT system for their own personal gain. And he did better for himself once he was in control of his own life (when he was no longer a minor). I agree, he was put in a horrible position more than once by a broken government system, so forgive me if I don't think we should pour more money into the government for them to waste.

    His life could have turned out VERY different if he had taken the easy route. But HE made the choice to do better for himself. While many people do not.

  6. Adira

    wonderful pomelo / 30692 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: I think that's pretty unfair. The majority of people on assistance are doing everything they can to get off assistance and better their lives. You're implying that everyone on assistance is just taking the "easy" route (which, I'd argue is not easy at all), which I find offensive.

  7. JoJoGirl

    cantaloupe / 6206 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: We just have different perspectives on it - I see that and say "fix the system", not "every man for himself".

  8. Navy_Mommy

    nectarine / 2458 posts

    @JoJoGirl: do you actually think it's possible to "fix" when SO MANY facets are broken? This is not just like elect a new president, everything will get better. This is not just health-care, or just Foster system, or just SNAP or WIC. There are too many broken parts, and giving the government more money won't fix what is broken.

  9. JoJoGirl

    cantaloupe / 6206 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: Yes, because I don't see any alternative. And yes because that was the question of this thread I disagree living on assistance is the 'easy way out', and the cycle of poverty will continue to perpetuate itself until SOMETHING happens to stop it - your husband may have broken the cycle in his life, but again he's the outlier. If my choice is to look away, pretend it doesn't exist, bitch about paying taxes? No, I'm not going to do that.

  10. Navy_Mommy

    nectarine / 2458 posts

    @Adira: we qualify for assistance based off how much money we make. We choose not to get it because we don't actually need it. To me that says that system is broken, but many people would because, why not? I don't think that's an unfair assumption.

    Many of the people who are for MORE government assistance seem to think the majority of people using it have NO OTHER CHOICE and in my experience that just isn't the case. Having no choices and not liking your choices are two different things. Obviously your experiences and interactions have been vastly different than mine.

  11. Navy_Mommy

    nectarine / 2458 posts

    @JoJoGirl: then become a foster parent. Do something very productive that will actually help break one of the broken systems. Donate to a nonprofit that actually HELPS the people who want help. Don't throw more money into a government that has proven to be so wasteful.

  12. Adira

    wonderful pomelo / 30692 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: I think it's important to remember that one's experiences aren't the ONLY experiences that there are. Just because you know it's possible to find success without using assistance doesn't mean that it's ALWAYS possible, you know? My opinion is that there should be those safety nets in place so that someone doesn't have to just figure it all out on their own like your husband did. I think it's AWESOME that he was able to find something that worked for him and better his situation, but that doesn't mean that it's possible for everyone to do the same on their own and that we shouldn't help them just because some people might be okay without help.

  13. JoJoGirl

    cantaloupe / 6206 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: Ugh HB ate my super long response. Summarized, this system affects WAY more than just people living on public aid. It affects me - a middle class, two-income, 3 masters degree family, because next year I will be working at a loss with 2 in daycare JUST because we need health insurance. This is very nuanced and the middle class suffers just as much as the poor people. With no safety net, we are all ONE step away from being there with them. i know we can move to a state with cheaper child care and housing, I know we have choices. That doesn't change the fact that this affects us too.

  14. Astro Bee

    pear / 1503 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: I'm happy that your husband was able to pull himself out of the terrible situation he was in, especially given that he was not responsible for the choices that put him there. It's been stated that many people are either poor and/or on assistance through no fault of their own, and I agree. I don't, however, believe that the route your husband took is open for everyone. Recruitment offices don't take everyone that walks in the door; if they don't meet certain standards of health, fitness, and yes, even education, they aren't accepted.

    @Rockies11: I could have written that post myself. Thanks for putting it so eloquently!

  15. Navy_Mommy

    nectarine / 2458 posts

    @Astro Bee: I'm not saying that enlisting is the ONLY option. I'm just pointing out that there are options. I'm very aware of recruitment standards.

  16. Navy_Mommy

    nectarine / 2458 posts

    I just don't think the government, as it stands, should be given MORE money in the US when they're already so wasteful and inefficient with what they do get. Fix problems first, then give them more money. Not the other way around.

  17. JoJoGirl

    cantaloupe / 6206 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: Yes, I agree, that's what I said above. You asked if I thought it was possible to fix it. I say yes

  18. Astro Bee

    pear / 1503 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: Sure, but the wider HB community is not. Also, at least in Canada, you need a permanent address and telephone number to put on your forms, so that eliminates many people who would be using the military as means of escape from their situation. I used to work in recruitment myself, and while I know recruitment standards differ between countries and even branches of service, one thing that is common is that not everyone is eligible. Just like not everyone would be eligible for the other options you allude to.
    *Not being confrontational here, but there is sometimes no easy fix (or even a hard one) available to the individual that will completely pull themselves out of poverty. I think the system requires an overhaul from the top down. Unfortunately, there seems little impetus for that.

  19. looch

    wonderful pear / 26210 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: I think that's a very interesting suggestion, to become a foster parent. It's forcing me to take a good, hard look at myself and all the reasons I have for *not* doing it and making an internal change in my thinking.

  20. LBee

    pomegranate / 3895 posts

    @looch: I bet my butt paste is looking pretty good right now... don't you wish your son wasn't potty trained?

    ETA: Sorry for my failure to have any constructive comments in this thread. This was an interesting read, though!

  21. Astro Bee

    pear / 1503 posts

    So back to the original question, if the system were "fixed" so that abuses at the top and bottom were stopped, and your money was going to services you and your family use or might one day use, if circumstances changed, would you be willing to pay more money for those services?

  22. looch

    wonderful pear / 26210 posts

    @LBee: At least you're owning it!

  23. Maysprout

    grapefruit / 4800 posts

    I thought this article made some good points about the effect of scaling back aid when there doesn't seem to be enough jobs.
    http://theweek.com/articles/449215/does-welfare-make-people-lazy

  24. Mrs D

    grapefruit / 4545 posts

    @Cherrybee: I honestly think its super healthy to have discussions and hear other peoples perspectives. You just never know who is capable of understanding each persons right to their own opinion...without the whole "you're wrong" component being added in. An opinion cant be wrong...facts can be...

    Its how we grow and evolve to hear other people out - which is why I am not afraid to engage in the discussion. I only find it unfortunate when people enter these discussions with a closed mind or having already decided what someones opinion must be. Its sad as I re-read some of the comments here (aside from the blatant ones that offer no value to the discussion except to bash) and see that no matter how many times something is said clearly people can only seem to read what they perceive - not what the person was saying.

    I certainly agree that the things I have seen and witnessed first hand have shaped my view point to an extent...how could it not, right? But I also fundamentally believe in putting in effort for those things we receive - which also shapes my opinion - beyond basic human needs. I will always fully support the funding of shelters and what not that literally provide basic needs (food, shelter, water). When it comes to aid that is managed by the person in need I am just supportive of more oversight and restrictions on use...which in my opinion would not be an issue to those who plan to use their support the right way.

  25. Mrs D

    grapefruit / 4545 posts

    @Astro Bee: without a doubt...(unfortunately I dont see that as a reality in the near term)

  26. Astro Bee

    pear / 1503 posts

    @Mrs D: Unfortunately, neither do I.
    And for what it's worth, I value your contributions to this thread. Yes, your opinions differ from my own, but you have brought up numerous points that come from your own experiences in an effort to broaden the awareness and understanding of your "opponents." Most importantly, you have kept the conversation civil. I don't think you will ever change my opinion (I'm far too socialist, I'm afraid), but I do appreciate hearing others' points of view.

  27. Mrs D

    grapefruit / 4545 posts

    @Astro Bee:

  28. sunny

    coconut / 8430 posts

    @Navy_Mommy: I've seen firsthand how nonprofits waste money as well. I think like the government there are good parts and bad parts. It's hard to differentiate between them and sometimes you don't know unless you have inside knowledge because the waste doesn't show up in their tax filings.

  29. sorrycharlie

    hostess / watermelon / 14932 posts

    I've avoided getting involved but felt the need to pipe in with, we are lower middle class, I think? Anyway, we have some extra money weekly but have high bills (New England cost of living, student loans through the roof - yay grad school!, etc.).

    a couple years ago we really, really, REALLY needed/could have used WIC assistance. We could just squeak by but I was barely eating so that my LO and husband could. I even posted about it then and got tons of "you shouldn't not be eating to feed your LO" - but we made too much for assistance by a few thousand.

    I don't know how it makes sense that some people make too much but need it, and others apparently qualify but don't need it? It's truly messed up to me. I don't know what the fix is, but I'm so tired of reading the blatant assumptions people make.

    Drug addicts are not all bad people, as an aside, too. I have family members who are addicts. One is recovering and one is struggling to stay in recovery. They are both FANTASTIC, fantastic dads. Work hard. But keep slipping. It's not as easy as flipping a switch to shut off an addiction and it makes me sad to see people just throw them into a lump group that shouldn't be allowed services to help them get on, and stay on, their feet until they can do it themselves.

  30. jedeve

    pomegranate / 3643 posts

    I was going to post this on the last thread, but here is my overall thoughts on why us Americans will keep spinning in circles.

    We have this idea that you can be a self made man, someone who pulls themselves up by their bootstraps. As I understand it, that story developed as immigrants from countries like England developed the notion our country wasn't as class bound - you weren't destined to be in service or be royalty from birth. People like Andrew Carnegie started at poor and became rich. We fell in love with the new idea of social mobility. It was more hopeful than realizing most people still stay in their position.

    Now that narrative had been co-opted for a different purpose. It's used as a defense for wealth - I'm rich because I worked hard, other people could be too if they just tried. This is used to justify things like tax systems which are disproportionately hard on the poor (let's not forget that MANY taxes the poor pay more for, like sales tax, unemployment insurance, property, etc). We don't like the idea of redistribution of wealth because we view poverty as a moral failing of sorts. That stems from an early American idea called "the Protedtant work ethic." The idea was that if our destiny is preordained by God, then those who are chosen to go to heaven will be shown favor on earth as well. So if you were financially successful, God loved you. If you were poor, it's because you weren't a good person. Theologically this has fallen out of style, but it has deep deep influences on how we view poverty.

    I have no problem with Americans taking pride in pulling themselves up by their bootstraps. Upward social mobility is something that our country has as one of our core principles. The BIG problem, however, is that we aren't nearly as socially mobile as we think we are. The influences of poverty run deep and last generations. I heard a study recently that the stress of poverty can even begin to alter genes, affecting descendants. Poverty causes many things - stress, poor health, and those things are hard to change even if you suddenly had more access to capital. The saying the poor get poorer and the rich get richer is a much more apt description of what our society is really like. The divide between the rich and poor is growing, not shrinking.

    OF COURSE there are people who manipulate and misuse assistance. And of course there are people who break free from poverty and become wealthy. My problem is that these aren't representative of what's actually happening. Government programs work astoundingly well. Social security has decimated senior poverty. Food stamps have significantly reduced childhood hunger. Medicaid has eliminated medical bankruptcies. But conservative powers want us to repeat these narratives of social mobility, immoral people abusing the system, and perpetuate the myth of government inefficiency. It suits their needs, which is to reduce corporate taxes and income taxes on the super uber wealthy by villanizing the poor and blaming them for government spending.

    I just think it's important to realize why we talk about some of these stories. It's intentional and is crafted and it's not always in our best interest.

  31. Adira

    wonderful pomelo / 30692 posts

    @jedeve: Thank you for that! Well said! I think pointing out our history is very important and it's good to remember how our country evolved and why these thoughts might be so ingrained in us.

  32. Maysprout

    grapefruit / 4800 posts

    Am I the only one who doesn't care about the nobility of recipients?

    I just think in a civilized society there's a safety net. Some people will use it to climb high and just use it if they fall and others will use it as a hammock. But oh well, the only way to get people to climb high is to have a safety net.

  33. .twist.

    pineapple / 12802 posts

    @Maysprout: Nope. I generally agree with you. We can't help a few without helping many. And who's to say who will rise to the occasion if there aren't opportunities to get there.

  34. Adira

    wonderful pomelo / 30692 posts

    @Maysprout: I agree too. I think it's a waste of time and money to try to "police" people receiving assistance. The majority of people only use it as needed and try to better their circumstances so that don't need it anymore. Of course there are going to be a few people that abuse the system, but it's not worth being overly restrictive just to catch a few bad apples.

  35. Mrs. Chocolate

    blogger / nectarine / 2600 posts

    @jedeve: I this. Beautifully thoughtfully and insightfully written.

  36. catomd00

    grapefruit / 4418 posts

    @jedeve: yes! Thank you for expressing that so eloquently!

  37. Rockies11

    persimmon / 1363 posts

    This Dear Prudence reminded me of this conversation: http://www.slate.com/articles/life/dear_prudence/2016/02/dear_prudence_my_husband_wants_a_threesome_with_his_unattractive_best_friend.html

    The relevant letter is:

    Q. Ending it all?: I am 65. My husband is 70 and was recently diagnosed with cancer. For a variety of reasons, he wants to commit suicide and he wants me to help him. I am wrecked. His main concern is MONEY! He doesn’t want to use our life savings! He won’t listen to me (I’d rather have HIM). I told him I won’t help him, which led to an argument about whether or not I love him. He won’t talk to a therapist. Is it wrong of me not to want to help him? And how can I tell our kids?

    When I think about the US healthcare system, this is the major thing that troubles me. The choice between leaving yourself or your spouse destitute in old age, or dying. Having your whole savings that you worked for and planned to use to enjoy the golden years at risk in the face of a life threatening diagnosis. That is just so profoundly depressing to me.

  38. MrsTiz

    cantaloupe / 6800 posts

    This thread seems to be calming down but I just saw it and wanted to share my thoughts re: abusing the system. Bare with me, this is going to be long.

    Last year my life was wonderful. DH and I both worked full-time, 40 hour a week jobs. DS was in daycare, the bills were paid, though there wasn't much left after that. But things were stable. We decided to have another baby, after a few months of trying I finally got a BFP. Literally the next day after I got that, my DH lost his job. He was the breadwinner. I couldn't pay our basic bills (house, DH's car, gas, electricity, water) with my salary alone, we absolutely needed DH's income. Well, it took him 7 months to find a job. Seven. Months. of almost daily applications, even I was applying to places. I had a very difficult pregnancy that made me have to take almost two months off of work for home and then hospital bed-rest. I don't get paid time off, I don't have vacation hours.

    We literally had no choice other than to apply for assistance. I couldn't pay the bills. I maxed out our credit cards, I had yard sales, I started an Etsy shop, I hustled my ass off and DH did all he could do to earn money from side jobs. We blew through our minimal savings in the first month, we couldn't live on my money alone. So I had to humble myself and apply for WIC and foodstamps. You have to go through an enormous amount of time, work, waiting and paperwork to get approved for these things. Not to mention reapplying, going down for wellness checks, etc every other month.

    But you wanna know what? It was the *most* humbling experience of my entire life. I stood in the grocery store literally blinking back tears as I waited for the cashiers to ring up the free milk and bread that WIC gave my family. It's a slow, drawn out process that gives everyone in line behind you plenty of time to check out the contents of my shopping cart. And they did. Every time. People were burning holes into my head by staring at me and my groceries so hard because I looked like one of the Welfare Queens the entitled, privileged people complain about.

    My dyed hair? My sister is a hairdresser and does it for free.
    My iPhone? It's a company phone
    Micheal Kohrs purse? It was a present from my mom for my 21st birthday.
    Pregnant belly? Purposeful. When I got pregnant I could afford to do so.
    At the grocery store in the middle of the day with my toddler? I'm not a SAHM living off the government, I'm having to take unpaid time off of work because I can't afford to send my child to daycare anymore and DH was doing a side job that made more than I would have at work that day.
    Getting into my nice(ish) car? It's paid off, I did that when we were a duel income family.

    I went home to my nice house I couldn't afford anymore, watched my big flat screen TV that I bought before I needed assistance, used my internet to apply for jobs, list my belongings on craigslist and work on my website I was trying to grow.

    All that to say, next time you want to bitch about people on government assistance, just remember, there's more to their story. Being on assistance is not something you want to do, I know people who are on it and trust me, they don't want to be. No one wants to drive to a grocery store they don't usually go to because they're praying they don't run into someone they know when they're swiping their EBT card.

    Basically, I hope for those of your who are so judgy, you never need the assistance you think is so taken advantage of. I hope you never know what it's like to cry in the parking lot of the grocery store because you couldn't afford to buy the meat your family needed so you were forced to buy a shitty frozen meal instead because it was $3 cheaper. I hope you never, ever have to know what it's like on the other side and feel the need to explain yourself to entitled people like you.

  39. sorrycharlie

    hostess / watermelon / 14932 posts

    @MrsTiz:

  40. .twist.

    pineapple / 12802 posts

    @MrsTiz:

Reply »

You must login / Register to post

© copyright 2011-2014 Hellobee