Hellobee Boards

Login/Register

Childcare-more than 10%

  • poll: Do you spend more or less than 10% of your pretax income?
    More than 10% : (58 votes)
    62 %
    10% exactly : (5 votes)
    5 %
    Less than 10% : (31 votes)
    33 %
  1. josina

    pomegranate / 3973 posts

    Currently, daycare is 7% of our pre-tax income; next year it will be 15%. We have extremely cheap daycare.

  2. Anagram

    eggplant / 11716 posts

    @bluestriped bee: yeah, I don't think daycares would legally be allowed to have workers work more than full time, without overtime laws (time and a half), or hiring more people, etc. Plus, they still have the ratios they have to comply with, so it would more likely cause new centers to open.

    Obviously with any tax credit or deduction, my question is--what else in the budget will be cut for this? Will overall taxes go up? What level income people will be affected? If only people making more than 750k have slightly higher taxes, well...I personally am okay with that. If everyone has a slight tax bump for this and for paid family leave, and it's a line item that is easily tracked (like I have $10 a paycheck deducted for Family Leave and Childcare), then I'm okay with that. But I would like to see the breakdown, and I don't think either candidate has offered those kinds of specifics.

  3. Mrs. Carrot

    blogger / nectarine / 2043 posts

    @Anagram: I honestly wish I knew the right answer. My guess is that tax percentage probably is the best answer, but it's so hard to define what the best cutoff is. For example, if the proposal gets defined on net income (which isn't likely, I rarely see anything based on net income), then my family would qualify for tax relief under Clinton's plan. If it's on gross income, then we don't. We have the 5K coming out of our checks already pre-tax and it's not even a third of our annual costs of daycare. And again, this is just one kid! We're in the midst of looking for a new house right now to get into a better school district for LO, and my mind blows into little pieces when I do the math on our income (which by most national standards is pretty high up there), take out our basic expenses (we don't have any debt except our mortgage and are generally conservative spenders), and we can't even afford the average priced house in our area and have to look into deeper suburbs that then create a longer commute, etc. If we had a lower daycare cost (which would be hard, we already have a pretty conservative payment for our area), we could increase our mortgage just a bit. It's when all those things come together that I start banging my head against a wall about these relief plans and how people in the middle seem to end up missing out.

  4. Anagram

    eggplant / 11716 posts

    @Mrs. Carrot: Wait, is there an income cap on her plan? Or are you saying you wouldn't get relief because you pay less than 10%?

  5. Mrs. Carrot

    blogger / nectarine / 2043 posts

    @Anagram: I'm thinking there might be both, actually. If the proposal isn't income capped but defined at 10% of gross income, we miss out with our current costs. If they do cap it on income, I am certain we'd miss out. A lot of relief proposals, like student loan interest deductions for example, are income capped.

  6. Truth Bombs

    grapefruit / 4321 posts

    @Anagram: Oh I'm sure none of the policies outright say that, but I'm sure there are families at my day care paying more than 10% of their household income. So, if they pay less, the day care has to get that money back somewhere. Either by raising tuition for families that can afford it, or through government subsidies, that would be funded through likely higher taxes for me.

  7. Mrs. Carrot

    blogger / nectarine / 2043 posts

    @bluestriped bee: YES! I so agree with this. Our daycare is decent and accredited, but we actually had one of LO's teachers hit us up for money last year (not the first time she did it with parents) and they had to let go a teacher who had a baby because they couldn't afford to give her leave (and they aren't legally required to by our awesome national standards). I know they have good intentions and their turnover is low, but I'm certain the pay scale isn't that high.

  8. Anagram

    eggplant / 11716 posts

    @Truth Bombs: As far as I know, all proposed plans from both parties are through tax credit and deductions, so it isn't likely any daycare will raise tuition for this reason. However, higher taxes could happen. Trump says he'll take away some deductions from "the rich", but I guess we have to wait to see how that is defined, by income. Same will Clinton--her proposal isn't super specific at this point.

    Personally, living in NJ and having so many Canadian relatives, I am fine with slightly higher taxes if I know where it's going. In NJ we have Family Leave Insurance, and it's a line item on our paycheck deductions, it's a small amount (like $3-10, depending on income), and it's to allow every NJ worker 6 weeks of paid family leave. It's nice to see where it's going and to know the benefit.

    If childcare were similar, a line item paycheck deduction, I would be fine with it, whether or not my family directly benefits. I think if most people think about it long enough, they will see the benefit of more parents in the workforce, rather than staying home and sometimes needing gov't assistance. Perhaps eventually, our government can save money in assistance and apply towards childcare and education.

  9. peaches1038

    nectarine / 2047 posts

    12.75% of our gross income for one child 4 days a week

  10. BSB

    hostess / wonderful apple seed / 16729 posts

    @Anagram: Good point.

    Another thing I just thought of is if you have more kids clearly your expenses is going to be more. How will they handle someone who has one kid versus someone who had 5 kids?

    Will they have limitations or restrictions on what type of child care (nanny, daycare or other)?

    ETA: Could they do something similar to college aid and some public state universities get more funding than private? I understand why people have reasons to use private nannies and childcare, but we all know daycare facilities are usually cheaper than nannies and private. Just wondering how they will address this issue. Unless, this makes everyone go to nanny care... knowing they will only have to pay the first 10%. Though, I understand with tax deductions, you have to have the money upfront and be able to afford it in the first place.

  11. MamaG

    pomelo / 5298 posts

    It seems like it would have to be on a per dependent basis at some level as well. Last year when we had two in full time care, our cost was over 20% of gross income for TWO. Now that we have one in Kindergarten our expenses will decrease significantly. And the little is getting older where care goes down slightly in cost as well.

  12. Alba4

    nectarine / 2951 posts

    We send our 3 year old 3 days/ weekand our 12 week old 2 days/ week to daycare. Daycare costs are 18% of our pre-tax salaries. Crazy. We live in a NYC suburb.

  13. autumnleaves

    pear / 1622 posts

    I spend less than 10% but only because LO1 is in daycare 3 half days a week and LO2 is not in daycare. It would definitely be more a lot more than 10% with both in daycare full time.

  14. sapphire

    nectarine / 2173 posts

    With one kid, much less than 10% of our gross income. When we have two in daycare though, it'll be approaching 10%.

  15. Eko

    nectarine / 2148 posts

    I'm at 9% for full time for one. I have always considered our daycare very reasonable for the Boston area, even when I was making less.

  16. kiddosc

    grapefruit / 4278 posts

    13% with two in half days. DH is taking a pay cut to move to regular business hours in a few months and then the kids will be in full time. I don't even want to calculate the percentage then.

  17. Mrs. Carrot

    blogger / nectarine / 2043 posts

    @Anagram: I totally agree with you. We miss out on a lot of tax benefits based on our income, but I'm happy to pay more out of taxes to have those benefits be available. Curious to see how it all shakes out. My guess is by the time it even comes together, if it does, all our kids will be in school anyway LOL

  18. travellingbee

    hostess / papaya / 10219 posts

    @raspberries: We are also paying $1K more than our mortgage for two in daycare full time.

  19. caterw

    persimmon / 1445 posts

    We were spending 20% of our combined pre-tax income on chidcare for 3 days per week and also heavily utilizing grandma care for weekends. When DH got a big raise we decided that it made more financial sense for me not to work!!! If I were to go back to work at my former salary and put my now two kids in full-time care we would be spending about 25-30% since we moved a little too far away for regular help from grandparents. Quality daycare in our area is easily more than our rent!

  20. winniebee

    hostess / wonderful grape / 20803 posts

    Ours is just over 10%. Both kids go to school and we have a part time nanny, though the nanny does other stuff like cleaning so it saves us there.

  21. avivoca

    watermelon / 14467 posts

    @travellingbee: Two in daycare is going to be twice what we pay for our mortgage every month. It's going to be a lean three years as I don't anticipate any amazing promotions/salary increases coming our way.

  22. Anagram

    eggplant / 11716 posts

    @bluestriped bee: I was wondering a lot of the same things. These plans could really revolutionize childcare as we know it in the US.

    Would more people choose "expensive" care options like Montessori if they knew they would get a tax refund later and prices were capped at 10% of income? Would more people choose nannies AND pay them legally (including worker's comp, etc) if they knew they would get a refund later? Would more people choose large centers over home-based daycares? Would more people choose licensed care over unlicensed?

  23. Anagram

    eggplant / 11716 posts

    I started a new thread about all the potential big changes that could happen due to childcare expenses being capped at 10%.

  24. looch

    wonderful pear / 26210 posts

    I think it's important for society as a whole to have affordable childcare, so I support in theory, just not sure exactly how it would occur in practice.

  25. mrsjazz

    coconut / 8234 posts

    Now that LO is in public school we are paying way less than 10%. The last two years we paid 12% and the first two years of her life we paid almost 17%.

    This is one of the reasons we waited so long on TTCing for a second child.

  26. codeitall

    clementine / 874 posts

    If I include my quarterly bonuses (I always get at least 50% of it), it is less than 10%, otherwise I'm at 13% with one child not even full time. Dang. I do pay a lot in that context.

    Pretty sure when #2 comes along, I'm springing for a nanny because it will be the same as daycare for two and a basic housecleaning.

  27. PawPrints

    pomegranate / 3658 posts

    We are a lot less than 10% for full-time care for a one-year-old. (I think our center is a great deal.)

  28. Truth Bombs

    grapefruit / 4321 posts

    @codeitall: I had originally thought about doing a nanny once we had a second but the problem is, by the time number 2 comes along, number 1 is at the point where they are really benefitting from being around their peers and having a real learning curriculum, and a nanny wouldn't meet those needs, so you have to add preschool on top of the cost of the nanny.

  29. yoursilverlining

    eggplant / 11824 posts

    @looch: ditto. I'm exactly where you're at. We need changes, but I don't know how/what they need to be.

  30. NorthStar

    pear / 1881 posts

    We pay about 4.7% of our pretax income on daycare costs. We are two full time working parents with one kid in daycare/preschool. I realize that we are VERY lucky with the cost of our care (we live in the midwest - rural area).

    We will be having a baby in mid-February, but since we went through infertility and our DD will be almost 5 when the baby comes, we will only have a short period of time when 2 are in full time care.

  31. Mrs. Pen

    blogger / wonderful cherry / 21616 posts

    More than 10% of my income. But less than 15%

    With dh's Incone it's 7% but DH is losing his job.

    Also our son is already 4.5, so rates are cheaper.

  32. Kemma

    grapefruit / 4291 posts

    I'm in New Zealand and we currently pay about 8% of our pre-tax income to Childcare costs. DH and I work a total of sixty hours, have a total of 54 hours of daycare (27 hours per child) and eighteen of those hours are paid for by the government. If we didn't have the eighteen hours of free childcare then our percentage would be closer to 16%

  33. MrsBrewer

    coconut / 8854 posts

    DH works fulltime, and I work part time. Our childcare for 2 days a week is 8% of gross pay.

  34. CakeLady

    pear / 1657 posts

    I voted 10% exactly (really 9.6%, but just about - yikes). We have one LO in full time preschool/daycare.

  35. matador84

    papaya / 10560 posts

    We pay 11% pre tax, next year it will drop to 9%.

  36. Mrs. Lion

    blogger / grapefruit / 4836 posts

    With both of us working full time and both kids in full time daycare, daycare is about 27% of our pre-tax income. By far our biggest expense.

  37. Trailmix

    nectarine / 2152 posts

    Pfffffff. Our is around 25% of our pre-tax income

  38. MaisyMay

    GOLD / cantaloupe / 6703 posts

    I am in the San Francisco area and we are spending 23% off our pre-tax income on our daycare/preschool for the 2 kids. This makes me really look forward to kindergarten.

  39. farawayyama

    kiwi / 556 posts

    I spend about 15% but that's because as a teacher I don't send her for summer. If I did it would be over 20% for one child.

    I'm a teacher in a low income/low teacher pay school, DH is a grad student, so realistically it's due to limited income.

Reply

You must login / Register to post

© copyright 2011-2014 Hellobee