I just found out yesterday that kids here start school full time at age four and I'm really upset about it! It is not compulsory until the term after they turn five, but if you don't apply for a school and enroll them at age four, there is no guarantee there will be a place for them at age five, in fact, it is unlikely there will be a place for them.

DD1 is 2.5 and will be starting nursery in the fall for two mornings per week, two and a half hour sessions each time. I planned on keeping her in nursery (preschool) the following year, when she's four, attending four mornings per week, but now I'm finding out she will have to go to the primary school five days per week, for a full 6.5 hour school day if we want her to have a place in Year One (age five, the compulsory age for school attendance). Am I the only one who thinks this is absolutely insane for a four year old?!

DD has a late June birthday so she will be one of the youngest kids - I think there is a world of difference between a 4 yrs 10 mos child and a 4 yrs 2 mos old child, but there is no flexibility with this.

Maybe I'm being a bit of a crazy momma here but I hate the thought of sending DD to school as a barely 4 yr old. Kids are little for such a short time and I think up until the age of five, childhood is mainly for play and socialisation, not formal education. Sigh...

What age will/did you send your child to full time school? I'm not referring to daycare, even if it has an academic based curriculum, I'm referring to full time school, in a proper primary school, where they are in a structured learning environment all day.

I structured the post to reflect if it is a young age for starting school (ie those born within three months of the school year starting) and those whose birthdays place them middle of the pack. Also feel free to comment with whether this is your choice or the government's, and how you feel about it!