Hellobee Boards

Login/Register

If you are salaried and covered by FMLA...

  1. Pirouette

    pomegranate / 3331 posts

    @Modern Daisy: this is exactly what i was hoping for - 6 weeks paid! but it doesn't sound like our policy, unfortunately. from my firm's HR info, i see LTD but no mention of STD at all...i'm hoping this doesn't mean i'm going to be stuck with the NYS allowance (i think we know you can't live on that in NYC, haha!)

    @JoJoGirl: ugh, yea that's what i'm concerned about...we're hoping to get pregnant soon, but that would mean no PTO for the whole year of 2014! i wish i'd gotten pregnant last cycle, haha.

    @MrsH: yup, all about the billables! I feel like FMLA doesn't do all that much other than guarantee your job, and my job is safe. But I was hoping at least some part of my mat leave would be paid...especially since i know i'll have to work at least somewhat while on mat leave, because I know it's inevitable i'll have to work a bit while on leave. Stupid billables!

  2. Goldilocks1107

    clementine / 878 posts

    I was able to use short term disability (70% of pay) for 6 weeks (after a 2 week waiting period). So 4 weeks short term disability. Then added in vacation and sick time throughout my 3 month leave to ensure we had a consistent (but lower) paycheck to supplement DH's regular income.

  3. kodybear

    pear / 1616 posts

    My company paid 100% of my salary the first 6 weeks and then the state paid I think 60% for paid family leave. The whole thing still kind of confuses me tho haha why do they make it so complicated!

  4. LindsayInNY

    bananas / 9229 posts

    @Pirouette: @MrsH: All my prior firms were crap when it came to vacation/time off. This is the first job where I've had more than 2 weeks vacation. But, what's the point when I still have to bill a bajillion hours a year?!

  5. bunnylove08

    grapefruit / 4442 posts

    I had to take all my vacation and sick and that was 2 months and if I wanted to I would have been able to take 12 weeks unpaid (FMLA) so we do not have any paid maternity leave.

  6. Pirouette

    pomegranate / 3331 posts

    @LindsayInNYC: exactly! i get 4 weeks, no accrual, but i never take all those days, and even if i do, i'm working while i'm away (checking emails, etc.). that's why it's a bit ridiculous to have completely unpaid leave while i'm still making them $ (even if less $ during that time)

  7. LindsayInNY

    bananas / 9229 posts

    @Pirouette: We accrue but I don't know how much they enforce it. I have 4 weeks now but can only carry over 1 week to the following year and it has to be used by March. If I get BFP within the next couple cycles, I might ask if I can carry over 2 weeks instead, just to offset maternity leave pay.

  8. Raindrop

    grapefruit / 4731 posts

    I'm in California and I heard we were different.

    I also work for a very big company.

    This is what it boiled down too

    4 weeks before due date (you are off work!)
    - first week sick (as per my company's policy)
    - next 3 weeks at 55% pay up to a cap (in 2012 the cap was 1100) (covered with with California Pregnancy Disability Leave (CA PDL) this is a STD (short term disabilty)) (this is for the 4 weeks before birth and 6-8 weeks after birth)) + my company paid the rest to my match my salary (they match to CAL PDL to match my salary, company policy) (CAL PDL + Company = full pay)

    Birth! - 6 week for vaginal and 8 weeks for c-sention (again CAL PDL + Company = full pay)

    6-8 weeks after
    - California Paid Family Leave (CA PFL) kicks in and also gives 55% salary up to a point (again 2012 max was 1100), for 6 more weeks. No more company match for me!

    So these work along with with Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) because the california programs do not have job protection was as FMLA does. California also has California Family Rights Act (CFRA) which is also unpaid and goes in affect along with the paid programs above for job protection after FMLA is done for the last 6 weeks of the leave but this gives you 12 more weeks.

    Super break down.

    4 weeks before - paid full - job protected (FMLA + CAL PDL + company)
    6-8 weeks after - paid full - job protected(FMLA + CAL PDL + company)
    12-14 weeks after - paid 55% - job protected (CAL PFL + CFRA)
    18-20 weeks after - unpaid but job protected (CFRA)

    So in california you can basically take 16-18 weeks off (4 weeks before + 12-14 weeks after) with some sort of pay.

    I hope I answered this question.

  9. marionberry

    pomelo / 5041 posts

    I haven't taken maternity leave yet, but I am so confused as to how all of my days and such work together. This board made me email one of our HR girls. So thanks!

    I have STD that can go up to 26 weeks but only pays $900/month. Then we have this thing called EIB which is basically sick leave and I have a little over 5 weeks accrued (which would pay at full rate). Then I have PTO of about 3 weeks accrued as well. What I don't know is if I have to use up all of my EIB and PTO before I get anything from my STD. I don't mind burning through my EIB but don't want to burn through all of my PTO. It's taken 5 years to accrue all of that. FMLA gives me 12 weeks off but realistically it's looking like we may only be able to afford 8.

  10. MamaG

    pomelo / 5298 posts

    Exactly the same as @Kiddosc.

    I had accrued 10 weeks of sick and vacation time. We are allowed to carryforward all unused hours. I have a seperate STD policy but was unable to collect on it as my employer required me to use all accrued time while out on FMLA.

    I accrue 3 weeks of vacation and 6 sick days a year. I just had not used any sick time (in 4 years) and had started saving my vacation when we started TTC.

  11. KT326

    pomegranate / 3438 posts

    I'm in California and this is what I did:

    I was pulled out of work a week and a half before I had my son. I used sick time for that week. After DS was born my STD kicked in and I got 6 weeks paid at 55%. For those 6 weeks my company covered what the state didn't pay so I would get 100% of my salary. After that my Paid Family Leave kicked in and I got paid for 6 weeks at 55% of my salary. Then I took 3 weeks unpaid. So I was out 16 weeks total, I got to spend 16 weeks with DS and 13 weeks was paid.

  12. Pirouette

    pomegranate / 3331 posts

    @Raindrop: @KT326: ok then, that's settled. I'm going home, packing my bags and moving to Cali

    @LindsayInNYC: that's a good idea...i wonder if they'd let me accrue if it's close to the start of a new year - worth asking!

  13. Raindrop

    grapefruit / 4731 posts

    @KT326: Oh is it 60%? I thought it was 55%.

    I also forgot to mention what I did. I took 3 weeks before (the 4 weeks are use it or lose it, but I had work commitments I wanted to get done before leaving) but I took an extra week of unpaid to round a complete 4 months off to have and be with DS.

  14. KT326

    pomegranate / 3438 posts

    @Raindrop: I just checked and it is 55%. I don't know why I had 60% in my head! I just fixed my post

  15. Raindrop

    grapefruit / 4731 posts

    @KT326: I didn't know either! That's what someone told me and I just assumed 55% was correct. ^_^ Thanks for checking!

  16. PurplePumps

    pomegranate / 3809 posts

    We don't actually get paid maternity leave, but we can be paid short term disability for 6 weeks (100% pay - I bought extra coverage, otherwise its only 75%), after using one week of our own time off. Then if we want to get paid for the rest of the time, we have to use vacation time. I get 4 weeks + 1 week carry over, so I'll be able to be paid for 10 weeks max if I want to use up all my vacation time.

  17. Pirouette

    pomegranate / 3331 posts

    @PurplePumps: when did you buy extra coverage? i assume that's something you have to do before you are pregnant...did you talk to your employer before you were pregnant or just buy from an outside vendor?

  18. MrsH

    honeydew / 7667 posts

    @Pirouette: @LindsayInNYC: yeah, so long as I meet my hours i guess I can do as I please but I basically have to work everyday or makeup time somehow to meet my hours so yeah that pretty much equals little vacation time. I'm curious what they will do with my billable hours when I take leave. Im supposed to get 12 weeks paid mat leave but My salary is based on my hours so if they are going to decrease my hours (so I can meet them with a mat leave) then my salary would decrease and that would be like not getting paid at all. I'd just be working less hours in a shorter time period and getting paid less. If they don't decrease my hours and i get paid normally then how do the metrics work?!? Because there is no way I can meet my hours and take a mat leave. Plus ill be working anyways I'm sure so it's to like I shouldn't be paid did I Mention there is no set policy so ill just have to figure it out with them?

  19. LindsayInNY

    bananas / 9229 posts

    @MrsH: @Pirouette: I would think your hours would be prorated while you're out? So, if, for example, you're required to bill 1800 hours per year (hah, wouldn't that be nice!), that's 150 per month. If you're out for 12 weeks (aka 3 months), I would think you'd be required to bill 1350 (150 x 9 months) for the rest of the year. But I don't think your salary should be affected. Are you not entirely salaried? I make X amount per year but I also have a set number of hours to bill. If I don't mind them, I get paid the same but could technically lose my job. If there's no set policy, that's what I would propose to them!

  20. PurplePumps

    pomegranate / 3809 posts

    @Pirouette: I am not pregnant yet, and have told no one of my plans. We have a yearly option to change our benefit elections (HMO to PPO or HSA, etc, high/low dental, 75%/100% cover on short term disability, etc) so I elected to change mine when the election period came up at the end of last year with the hopes of having a child this year. This is just through the insurance provider that would pay that out (I cant remember who). You just say you want it, they send you a questionnaire to answer and then let you know if your coverage is approved. They do ask if you are pregnant on it, but I'm not sure if they have the right to deny you based solely on that.

  21. MrsH

    honeydew / 7667 posts

    @LindsayInNYC: I'll post on your wall

  22. Pirouette

    pomegranate / 3331 posts

    @PurplePumps: ah, ok. I looked at our insurance docs but only saw LTD, not STD, and LTD was automatic (no pay in for employee), so i'm guessing it's separate from our normal benefits, or doesn't exist and i'm in for a tough road

    @MrsH: It sounds like you aren't even salaried, so your situation is a little different. but yea, so frustrating, you'll be working anyway, so you should be paid something!

    @LindsayInNYC: our hours requirement is a little less of a requirement. I'm salaried, and the hours determine my bonus. if i don't make bonus, they smile and wish me a merry christmas, no repercussions. but if i make it, i make more the more i bill. So i'm assuming they'll cut my salary and i'll make 10/12ths of my salary if i take 8 weeks or whatever. and no bonus opportunity. but if i'm still working during that time (like i do on vacation), that just seems a bit unfair!

  23. LindsayInNY

    bananas / 9229 posts

    @Pirouette: Our hours determine our bonus too. We have a minimum requirement but we have set bonus amounts for how many hours we bill over the required amount. So whenever I get pregnant, that year will essentially be a wash when it comes to meeting the requirement and/or any bonus (which I'm fine with). I don't think legally they can cut your salary when you're out though. Unless you have some sort of employment agreement that says that.

  24. MrsH

    honeydew / 7667 posts

    @Pirouette: I'm salaried but there are other variables

  25. MrsH

    honeydew / 7667 posts

    @LindsayInNYC: I think she just means her salary will be cut because she doesn't get paid mat leave.

  26. LindsayInNY

    bananas / 9229 posts

    @MrsH: Ahh, I get it. Technically speaking then, I guess so? If I'm only paid 50% while I'm out, that will result in a lesser amount over the course of the year. It sucks but in some ways I feel like it comes with the territory. A lot of jobs are like that =/

  27. Pirouette

    pomegranate / 3331 posts

    @LindsayInNYC: so you think they'd continue to pay you while you are out? i'm pretty sure my firm doesn't do that. i guess they could pay you based on your work while you are out (sort of like a commission on the matters you work on while on mat leave), but i cant imagine they'll continue to pay me my salary for the time i'm not here, except to the extent it's covered by vacation days.

    @MrsH: congrats!!! well yea, that opens up a whole other can of worms

  28. LindsayInNY

    bananas / 9229 posts

    @Pirouette: Yes. If I go out on maternity leave with less than 2 years here, I get 5 weeks at 2/3 pay and 7 weeks at 1/2 pay (plus whatever vacation/sick). So if I have 3 weeks vacation/sick, I would take 5 weeks at 2/3 and only need 4 weeks at 1/2 pay. Technically it's less money over the course of the calendar year though. And I won't get a billing bonus. I didn't realize this would vary by practice area (I think that's the catch between the 3 of us!).

  29. Pirouette

    pomegranate / 3331 posts

    @LindsayInNYC: yea, that sounds reasonable! i don't think my firm has any kind of policy like that, which is a shame, because i've been here a long time! but there are so few women, it just doesn't come up enough for a set policy, i guess.

  30. MrsH

    honeydew / 7667 posts

    @Pirouette: thanks, yeah I'm the first woman at our firm who will to go through this. So we shall see.

    @LindsayInNYC: I don't know about practice area but I Imagine all firms are different even those that are the same size.

  31. wheres_c

    pomelo / 5789 posts

    Mandatory use of PTO, I had one week. Then 4 weeks paid short term disability insurance (60% of salary) 7 weeks unpaid

Reply

You must login / Register to post

© copyright 2011-2014 Hellobee