Hellobee Boards

Login/Register

Choosing when to induce - Selfish me.

Now that I am 27 weeks, we've started talking more about our induction. We're due December 30th, and the doctors were originally talking about trying to induce around December 15th. Now they are talking about maybe just one week early, around the 23rd.
I know that it's best for baby to bake as long as possible, but I don't like this new plan for 3 reasons: 1) I don't want to spend Christmas in the hospital. 2) I don't want her to have a birthday that close to Christmas (I'm more than okay with a week before Christmas or more). 3) My mom won't be able to stay with us as long. She has to work Christmas Eve and Christmas (essentially she gets nearly triple pay on those 2 days and will need the money, plus her company policy is no time off at Christmas, week before is okay)

Is it totally selfish of me to want to be induced at 38 weeks instead of going until 39 weeks? I'm diabetic and everything has looked great so far, which is why they are willing to wait an extra week. I know this could change though. Thoughts?

  1. Arden

    honeydew / 7589 posts

    Why are you inducing? Sorry, I don't remember much about your situation.

  2. MaisyMay

    GOLD / cantaloupe / 6703 posts

    @Arden: No worries. I'm diabetic and there are to many concerns about going to full term.

  3. Mrs. Stroller

    blogger / nectarine / 2010 posts

    Just curious, why wouldn't you wait until your due date? That would solve the issue with your mom staying since the holidays would be over.

  4. Mrsbells

    squash / 13199 posts

    I personally am in the camp of waiting til atleast 40 weeks to induce if at all. The march of the dimes has recently been sharing losts of posters saying that those last few weeks are very important for the baby's development

    I had an induction and it failed. So you cant always count on the induction anyway.

  5. Mrs. Stroller

    blogger / nectarine / 2010 posts

    Well you answered my question while I was typing

    I'd just wait and see and go as long as possible. I didn't want an xmas baby either, but a December baby is a December baby no matter how you cut it

  6. DillonLion

    GOLD / eggplant / 11517 posts

    If I have to induce, I would choose to wait until as late as possible.

  7. Arden

    honeydew / 7589 posts

    What are the risks of going to full term/post term as a diabetic?

    I guess I'd have to weigh those against the risks of early induction, because typically I'm against induction unless in the case of pre-eclampsia or other life-threatening complication.

  8. autumnlove

    hostess / wonderful watermelon / 39513 posts

    I would try to wait as long as possible and pick the latest date they offer you!

  9. mrbee

    admin / wonderful grape / 20724 posts

    I would want to do what's best for the baby, but one more data point to consider...

    Our local schools offer free pre-K for half a day starting when your child is 3-4. Charlie was born in December and so he will qualify next year, but his friend was born one month later and won't qualify until the next school year. So a few days will end up making a huge difference in cost, since his friend will have to pay for full-time private daycare for 12 more months than him!

  10. mrskc

    bananas / 9357 posts

    I would wait. Especially to let baby grow a little more and for the lungs to mature more.

  11. Rainbow Sprinkles

    eggplant / 11287 posts

    I would try and wait too. I know spending christmas in the hospital wouldn't be fun, but is having an earlier induction and not spending christmas in the hospital worth the risks of baby coming too early? If your cervix isn't favorable at 38 weeks and you choose to induce anyway, your chance of c section triples.. are you okay with that? If you are, that's fine....I would just make sure you carefully weigh your options.

    You could make having a christmas baby fun! You could bring her home in a stocking and she could always have super festive parties.

  12. heffalump

    GOLD / wonderful grape / 20289 posts

    I would wait. Those things might seem important to you now, but when your baby comes a healthy baby is the only thing that will be important.

  13. chopsuey

    hostess / wonderful honeydew / 32460 posts

    I would keep her inside as long as possible! Nothing earlier than 39 weeks unless she decides she's ready to come out before

  14. spaniellove

    honeydew / 7916 posts

    @MaisyMay: In terms of the baby's birthday being close to Christmas, my friend's birthday is Dec 12 and she says people always just get her one gift; same with another friend whose birthday is Dec 27 so I think it'll be the same no matter when in December it falls!

  15. KT326

    pomegranate / 3438 posts

    Just remember that things can change! My sister is a diabetic and I don't think she made it past 37 weeks with all three of her kids. However, she did have blood pressure issues so starting around 35 weeks she would end up on bed rest. Hopefully you won't have to worry about that!

  16. leelee

    persimmon / 1194 posts

    I get where you're coming from wanting to get induced early, especially since the last couple weeks are very uncomfortable. But keep in mind that when you induce can also affect your induction outcome. SIL was induced at 38 weeks and was in labor for 27 hours and ended up getting a c/s (her body just wasn't ready). I got induced at 39 weeks and had a vaginal delivery after 10 hours of labor.

  17. MaisyMay

    GOLD / cantaloupe / 6703 posts

    Babies born to women with diabetes are at a risk for being much larger, gaining too much weight in the last 2 weeks of the pregnancy, jaundice, being born with birth defects, and risk nerve damage during labor. If born heavy, babies have a much higher risk for diabetes, obesity, and other issues later in life. A pregnant mom who goes to full term risks blood pressure problems, pre-eclampsia, kidney problems, nerve problems, and other issues.

  18. Andrea

    GOLD / wonderful coffee bean / 18478 posts

    Like most people have said, I would wait. I hope to go to 40 weeks with this one. DD was 40 weeks and 4 days. She was born big and healthy. Maybe it's just a coincidence but she had great head control from early on and hit milestones earlier. I feel like baking longer helped!

  19. Arden

    honeydew / 7589 posts

    @MaisyMay: Is it possible to have frequent checks in the last month and just play it by ear, going as long as possible unless there are any red flags? You could wait until there is an indicator and do it then.

    It's just because there are some serious risks associated with early induction too (early means anything before 39 weeks). The risks to the baby include complications with breathing, feeding, trouble maintaining body temperature, and jaundice.

  20. MaisyMay

    GOLD / cantaloupe / 6703 posts

    @Arden: That's what we'll end up doing. The thing is, I know this isn't MY choice. When the doctor says to induce is when we'll do it.

  21. mrbee

    admin / wonderful grape / 20724 posts

    @MaisyMay: you've got my full support for whatever you decide!! It's clear you've put a lot of thought and research into this!!

  22. Arden

    honeydew / 7589 posts

    @MaisyMay: Well... it's still your choice. Obviously you need to take your doctor's recommendation into consideration, but I would suggest doing your own research as well.

    There is no reason to automatically assume your doctor isn't making the best possible choices for you, but unfortunately doctors choices aren't always only based on you, sometimes there are personal things influencing their advice as well.
    If the doctor doesn't want to be away from his family on Christmas, he might suggest induction earlier than he otherwise would.

    It's just something to consider - I've seen far too many babies suffer from breathing problems or other issues from being induced to early because of a doctor's convenience. It happens.

    Basically what I'm trying to say is that you need to make an informed choice - and it IS your choice.

  23. autumnlove

    hostess / wonderful watermelon / 39513 posts

    @MaisyMay: I was due on Dec 20th and wanted to go into labor naturally but I got induced a week later and LO was born on the 29th. I had begged my Dr to let me wait a few more days but he refused... KP has some firm guidelines about labor induction! Good luck with everything! I'm in the same boat as you for this pregnancy, baby will be delivered early.

  24. DillonLion

    GOLD / eggplant / 11517 posts

    @Arden: Just this morning mine told me I was on his induction list because I'm due around Thanksgiving and he's going to be out of town (absolutely zero reason to induce for medical reasons at this point). I was like "no thanks!"

  25. Arden

    honeydew / 7589 posts

    @highwire: Exactly. *sigh*

  26. Mrs. Cat in the Cradle

    GOLD / kiwi / 613 posts

    @MaisyMay: Please do what is best for baby and you when the time comes. There is nothing selfish about preferring a particular situation.

  27. KT326

    pomegranate / 3438 posts

    In @MaisyMay's situation it isn't just that she would like the baby to be born before Christmas nor is it for the Dr's convenience. There are so many more risks with a diabetic pregnancy. I think people are missing that fact. So even though her pregnancy is picture perfect rright now, things can change. My sister's blood pressure started spiking around 35 weeks with all three pregnancies and she was put on hospital bed rest. Even at 37 weeks my sister's babies weighed 10lbs, 12lbs and 11lbs.

  28. luckypenny

    grapefruit / 4582 posts

    I would wait as long as possible. DD was 11 days late and believe me I thought about inducing everyday but as long as her and I were doing good, it was worth it to wait.

  29. blackbird

    wonderful grape / 20453 posts

    Is the doctor OK with the baby coming a little early? Maybe just a couple of days (versus a week) would make it easier around the holidays? I don't think it's a huge deal, frankly. Many of my friends are married into the military and they all end up with inductions because it's important for the father to be there.

  30. CupQuakeWalk

    coconut / 8475 posts

    I am against it but NOT because of thinking you're selfish: it has NOTHING to do with being selfish or not.
    I am against it solely based on the chances that you will end up laboring for hours on end only to be c-sectioned because your body wasn't ready. If that doesn't bother you then go for it.
    I don't think you're selfish at all....I doubt the doctors would do anything or let you choose anything to harm your baby!

  31. Crisark

    pomegranate / 3398 posts

    @MaisyMay: I'm going against the grain....I say if the baby is healthy with fully developed lungs and there is no risk then induce at 38 weeks.
    This isn't solely your choice. No good doctor is going to let you have your child early if it's going to be harmful to that child.
    I was emergency induced the first time at 37 weeks and had a perfectly healthy almost 8 lbs baby. I was induced at 39 weeks with my second and she was also perfect.
    This is a decision between you and your doctor and no one else should try to tell you what to do.
    You have plenty of medical reasons to warrant the induction regardless of the personal reasons as well.
    Good Luck!

  32. Nskillet

    persimmon / 1099 posts

    @MaisyMay: my opinion? No way you make it full term anyway. I only made it to 37 weeks (had GD) and they say women with type 2 or other kinds of diabetes usually go into labor early because the inability to breakdown sugars yourself causes the placenta to "ripen" faster than non diabetes babies.

  33. T.H.O.U.

    wonderful clementine / 24134 posts

    I know a lot of people have talked about risks to the baby being induced early (38 vs 39). Another thing to consider is what type of birth do you want to have. I posted earlier about the Bishop score which rates how favorable you are for induction that will not end in c-section. Inducing early with a low Bishops Score may mean a tougher labor with more medical interventions and a much higher risk that it will result in a c-section. Just want to make sure you would be ok with those risks for yourself as well.

    I still don't really understand why (assuming you were healthy) wouldn't wait to induce on the 27/28th. Typically inductions take a while, so it would still put the birthday after Christmas but before New Years. I was induced at 39.5 but would not have been comfortable inducing at 38.

  34. Shutterbug

    grapefruit / 4703 posts

    @MaisyMay: I agree with @Pumpkinspice and @sweetkate... I think some posters are missing the point here - with your diabetes you'll likely have a "full term" sized baby by 37 wks or so. I don't think it's selfish of you to think about the logistics of when your baby is born, and I think ultimately you (and your Dr!) will make the right choice. I'm not trying to say you should go one way or the other, just wanted to post in support and say that it's ok to feel like you're being "selfish"... we all know you have your baby's best interest at heart!

  35. Mrsbells

    squash / 13199 posts

    @Pumpkinspice: I think many "good" doctors were once of the opinion that it was okay to routinely induce at 37 weeks and sometimes even earlier, even when there was no medical reason.

  36. Crisark

    pomegranate / 3398 posts

    @Mrsbells: I suppose that's matter of opinion. I wouldn't entrust my life and my child's life with a Dr that I thought would make decision based on convenience.

  37. brownie

    grapefruit / 4110 posts

    @MaisyMay: I think from your post and your responses that you have all of the knowledge you need to make a good decision. There are so many concerns with diabetes that most women don't have to make these decisions. My SIL has diabetes and is trying to get pregnant. There is so much more she has to deal with than most people.

    I think you need to do what is best for you and your baby. You have 10 weeks left and ultimately, anything could happen. Baby could be breach which is probably a C-section, baby could want to come early anyway (a friend of ours came naturally 4 weeks early).

    My sister is born in December (the 19th) and yes, she often gets only one gift (though the gift is often bigger). My step brother was born on Christmas Eve. I think either way, your baby will get the attention it needs.

    It does suck that your mom may not be able to be there as long. But maybe she can come back afterwards.

    Great Luck!!!

  38. heffalump

    GOLD / wonderful grape / 20289 posts

    I think that the title of the post and the majority of your reasons for inducing early being Christmas probably confused some people, I know it did me. I completely skimmed over the part where you have diabetes.

    Do I think it's ok for you to hope that your baby is ready a little early due to your diabetes so you can work around Christmas? Of course! But I wouldn't count on it. babies tend to work on their own schedules.... not ours.

  39. Mrsbells

    squash / 13199 posts

    @Pumpkinspice: well a lot of doctors do make decisions based on convenience. Are you not aware of this? Its been a quite a hot topic. Many doctors and hospitals are trying to change this now since people are now interesting in c-section rates and the like..

Thread Closed

This thread has been closed.

© copyright 2011-2014 Hellobee