Hellobee Boards

Login/Register

What exactly *is* common core?

  1. Anagram

    eggplant / 11716 posts

    @T.H.O.U.: I agree with your points about why common core is good.

    But I think for it to work and be successful, the American public would need a gigantic cultural shift--- if people want longer school hours or more school days in a year, they would need to be okay with higher taxes (property, state, federal, somewhere) to pay for the added hours and days. The average joe on the street with no educational training would have to realize that they aren't experts on what works in teaching just because they attended school themselves, just as I am not a doctor just because I go to a yearly checkup-- and they would have to be okay with letting teachers do their job.

    Parents would have to stop grade grubbing on behalf of their kids and start accepting that not everyone is going to make an A. If the parents in my current school district are indicative of the rest of the US, I can tell you that parents don't want a challenging curriculum, they just want their child to have an A. Not from earning it, but from "extra credit" and silly projects and makeups and redos.

    If the US wants to compete with South Korea and Denmark, our entire society would have to radically change how we think about students and teachers. And I just don't see that happening right now when I read articles about education or talk to people that are not in education. In Korea, high school students stay at school till 10 pm studying. Can you imagine the outrage if a teacher in the US assigned enough work that it would take all night?

    Having a set of national standards is nice but just a drop in the bucket of everything we need to do to make our kids globally competitive.

  2. Happygal

    pomelo / 5000 posts

    @T.H.O.U: This is a long, but very well-written, article about CCSS and why things like the history of their development and testing are an integral part of the discussion of these standards.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/01/18/everything-you-need-to-know-about-common-core-ravitch/

    By the way, one of my jobs is working for a company that is a big player in publishing and creating curriculum materials. I like the reading standards (although there are a few things I would like to change), but I cannot ignore the politics of it all. I love talking education--it's my life!

  3. swedishfish

    GOLD / coconut / 8266 posts

    @T.H.O.U.: New York is pretty much all about Common Core testing as our teaching evaluations are now partially based on how the students perform on the Pearson-developed Common Core exams. I proctored the ELA for an elementary grade this year and I couldn't come up with appropriate answers for a few questions. The standards themselves aren't the glaring issue. We SHOULD have national standards but the focus on testing is absurd...at least in New York.

  4. swedishfish

    GOLD / coconut / 8266 posts

    @T.H.O.U.: I took calculus in high school so these standards aren't raising the bar THAT much in New York anyway.

  5. T.H.O.U.

    wonderful clementine / 24134 posts

    @Anagram: I absolutely agree common standards is just a drop in the bucket. Things mentioned like better pay and respect for teachers and respect for an education is a huge culture shift we need. But that's not going to happen overnight.

    @Happygal: not a bad read but obviously one sided. It significantly glances over the actual development, review, and adoption process of the standards. I agree that the timeline and story includes a significant piece on the testing component, I do believe the standards were developed, reviewed and adopted separately from a test in mind.

  6. Anagram

    eggplant / 11716 posts

    @Happygal: great article

  7. T.H.O.U.

    wonderful clementine / 24134 posts

    @swedishfish: you are right. The standards are not raising the bar that much in many states. But in other states they will have to make a huge jump. There was a grade given to each state on prior standards and their alignment to the common core. I will see if I can find links.

  8. T.H.O.U.

    wonderful clementine / 24134 posts

    @swedishfish: but testing is not something new. Again, I feel there are often too many issues tied up under "common core". I believe the standards themselves are good.

    But separate issues are the materials aligned to the standards, the curriculum used to teach the standards, testing on the standards, data collection on student performance, teacher evaluation based on student performance.

  9. swedishfish

    GOLD / coconut / 8266 posts

    @T.H.O.U.: true, Common Core and APPR have become intertwined here though as they were implemented at the same time. APPR is related to Common Core though because New York received RTTP money for its implementation.

  10. T.H.O.U.

    wonderful clementine / 24134 posts

    @swedishfish: sorry what is APPR?

  11. Happygal

    pomelo / 5000 posts

    @T.H.O.U.: It's not going to change overnight, sure, but why not focus on growing the process of teacher training and certification than creating standards right now? The focus is totally out of whack. You can have outstanding materials and standards, but that's not going to make a world of a difference if you don't have the best of the best teachers out there. Part of my job is going to schools around the country and observing materials being used in the classroom. I can tell you that even in schools where CCSS aligned standards are in place, poor teaching is taking still happening.

    And yes, the article is one side. But Ravitch is extremely well respected in education, and her points are not merely her own opinion. She has no dog in this fight, so to speak. She addresses why people cannot speak about the process of the CCSS: "From the outset, the Common Core standards were marked by the absence of public participation, transparency, or educator participation." That's a problem.

  12. T.H.O.U.

    wonderful clementine / 24134 posts

    @Happygal: definitely agree poor teaching is still out there. It's kinda a chicken or the egg type discussion. At least with common standards the teachers know WHAT to teach and then we need to follow up to make sure they have training and support to know HOW to teach them.

  13. swedishfish

    GOLD / coconut / 8266 posts

    @T.H.O.U.: Annual Professional Performance Review.

  14. Happygal

    pomelo / 5000 posts

    @T.H.O.U.: "But separate issues are the materials aligned to the standards, the curriculum used to teach the standards, testing on the standards, data collection on student performance, teacher evaluation based on student performance."

    But you cannot untangle CCSS and all those things you mentioned. You simply cannot. History has proven this and we're seeing it happening right now.

    We both agree that national standards could be a good thing for many of the same reasons. I'm not a total CCSS hater, despite how I may be coming across tonight! I'm passionate about the politics of education and teachers having a voice, so it's a hot topic for me. I would really love to see a well-thought out, carefully crated set of standards be implemented; I sadly don't believe CCSS is it.

    And I think the content, for the most part, of CCSS (I'm most familiar with the reading standards) builds nicely from year to year and is good.

  15. Happygal

    pomelo / 5000 posts

    @Anagram: glad you enjoyed it. Ravitch is pretty bad ass. (Off topic question--are there any educational blogs that you like to follow? You seem like you may be in the know and could help me add some good ones to my list!)

  16. T.H.O.U.

    wonderful clementine / 24134 posts

    @Happygal: I think when you ask at a basic fundamental level "What are the common core state standards" they are literally just a set of standards. Adding in those other topics (while I understand the policy and politics of how they are tied) are not standards.

    A lot of those other topics were already in motion in a lot of areas before CCSS. Some have changed and taken a new form since then. I agree they are all related in how they impact education but the standards are just the standards. For example standardized testing has been going on for a while with whatever standards a state had.

Reply

You must login / Register to post

© copyright 2011-2014 Hellobee