My labor with Charlie was so painful, and I got an epidural! I seriously don't know if I could have a second child if I couldn't have an epidural.
Do you think you could do it? Or would you stop at one?
My labor with Charlie was so painful, and I got an epidural! I seriously don't know if I could have a second child if I couldn't have an epidural.
Do you think you could do it? Or would you stop at one?
GOLD / wonderful coffee bean / 18478 posts
Great question. I had an epidural, too, but if it was not an option at all I would still have a second child if I really wanted that child. It seems like so many of my friends have given birth sans epidural lately that I am feeling like a wimp. They are inspiring me!
pear / 1861 posts
Nope! I had an epidural and the ragin pain I had from contractions for 15 hrs before I had an emergency c-section was enough.
Before I had Baby Bear, I said I'd go without meds to scar me enough to only have one.LOL!
GOLD / squash / 13464 posts
I don't know. I'd like to say that fear of pain wouldn't stop me from having another child if my husband and I wanted one. But ask me again after I've pushed one out.
coconut / 8305 posts
I went 17hrs w/o anything with DS.. and then only got something to get the nurses & doctor off my back (it was through my IV though... not an epi).
I guess since I'm pro-natural birth not having pain meds hasn't & wouldn't deter me for our future babies. *shrugs shoulders*
pear / 1852 posts
No answer for me yet, but here's my mom-
With me, she had an epidural.
With my middle sister, she wanted to go natural, to really experience childbirth, she changed her mind, but by the time she decided that it hurt too much, it was too late to give her one!
With my youngest sister, I don;t know what her plan was, but my sister was born 30 minutes after mom arrived at the hospital!
GOLD / papaya / 10166 posts
I would probably stop at one. I"m such a wuss when it comes to pain... I actually would have really bad menstral cramps and I would end up throwing up from the pain. I'm thankful there are epidurals so that I can not be terrified of doing the same during labor.
pear / 1852 posts
@MsMamaBear: Sounds great, but mom was in labour the entire second half of the pregnancy. She nearly lost my sister about halfway through. By the time she realized the pain she was feeling wasn't her regular pain, there wasn't much time to get across town.
pear / 1852 posts
@MsMamaBear: So are we, even though 19 years later my sister can be a giant pain in the arse.
GOLD / cantaloupe / 6703 posts
If there were no pain meds, I'd probably limit to just one kiddo. That probably sounds very vain and selfish, but I don't tolerate pain well.
pear / 1639 posts
I would think I could have more then one. But I would have to see what an all natural birth felt like first before I could honestly answer.
cherry / 172 posts
I only got to have an epidural for like 6 hours out of the 36 I was in labor. I had a good coach though and I made it through. After I pushed her out I was like hm...that wasn't that bad!
I would like to go through the entire labor without one next time. The only reason why I got one was because Pitocin is no joke.
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
No, it wouldn't affect my family planning. My reasoning is that women have been giving birth without it for longer than they have had access to it, so there must be some biological forces at play that let your mind and body surpass it and forget it.
GOLD / wonderful grape / 20289 posts
Even with the epidural I said I was only going to have one while I was in labor!
But of course a couple weeks later that was all forgotten and now I'm ready for my next. And I'm sure even without meds I'd feel the same way.
persimmon / 1099 posts
I dont have a clue yet as im just 17 weeks along now. I tend to be stubborn through so Im going to try and go as long as I can without pain meds. I know ill probably relent and get an epidural part way through but the thought of being confined to a bed the entire time freaks me out slightly.
pomegranate / 3980 posts
It wouldnt affect me. I had my first without meds and I fully plan on having my second and any others without meds also.
honeydew / 7968 posts
i want to say i could. trillions of women have done it over time, right? who knows, in reality though, because i haven't been through it once.
grapefruit / 4819 posts
I ALREADY joke with my husband that we might be one and done - and I'm only 11 weeks! I had really bad cramping from weeks 4 - 8 and that pain was so bad that I said there is no way I want to do this again. I'm sure labour pains are a thosuand times worse though so if I couldn't have an epidural, I'm thinking there is no way I'd do it again. I'll let you know for certain after this one is born!
pomegranate / 3398 posts
I had a faulty epi with my first delivery and was in horrendous pain for most of the 13hours I was in labor.
I had a good epi the second time around and that made my life so much better.
I would NOT have a third child like we are planning if meds weren't an option.
I can't handle that pain. I know some ppl can but I am not one of them.
hostess / wonderful grape / 20803 posts
I'm 15 weeks pregnant and FULLY plan on getting an epidural. If I can't get one or if it doesn't help, that would definitely have a bearing on how many kids we have. But say I can't have one and then have like a 30 minute labor. Maybe I could do it without pain meds? We currently want 3 kids, but instead I might go for 2 if I have a horrible labor/can't have pain meds. Who knows though!
kiwi / 500 posts
I don't think I could do it without an epidural or that I would want to. I don't look at the pain as some kind of badge of honor
, with modern medicine why not use it as long
As its safe for you. I don't care if ppl call me
A
Chicken, I had a great, almost pain free labor experience and that is something I look forward to when I do it again!
hostess / wonderful honeydew / 32460 posts
I think I'd still have 2-3 kids even if I couldn't do it with an epidural. Labor pains + pushing for 2 hours + 3rd degree tears were all worth it when I held my LO in my arms for the first time.
I'd do it all over again (without an epidural) in a heartbeat.
apricot / 464 posts
I have a theory that the pain is much worse if you're planning on getting an epidural...because you're not planning on dealing with pain, and therefore pain becomes "bad" and feels much worse, especially psychologically (which for me has SO much to do with it). After having gone unmedicated, I REALLY think anyone could do it...if they want to and if they're prepared for it.
That said, to the original question, no, I'm planning on a couple, and hopefully I can have any future babies naturally too
grapefruit / 4049 posts
@ohapostrophe: I totally agree with your theory.
I've had both an epidural birth and a natural birth. My mindset on how to deal with contractions was completely different both times. With the first, all I could think about was, "WHEN can I get my epidural?" -- as if it was just a given and a necessity. my contractions were very painful with that experience.
For my natural birth, I went into it thinking that pain is only worsened with "fear and anxiety". With this mindset, contractions weren't even totally painful, more like intense. I kept fear and anxiety out of my mind. I dealt with the labor by deep breathing and reminding myself that contractions were only temporary. It really helped, and in the end, I preferred going natural vs having an epidural! My contractions for the natural birth were stronger and intense right from the start, and baby came much faster too (6 hours vs 20 hours), yet I wasn't "in pain" like the first time. It sounds so crunchy and unbelievable to a "woman of science" such as myself, but I really think one's psyche going into it makes a huge difference.
having an epidural or not is definitely not a deciding factor in family planning for us... labor is a temporary experience, while having another child in our family would hopefully not be... it would be a lifelong reward. there are other ways to deal with pain than with heavy drugs.. but I don't judge those who choose that route as I did it that way too, and was happy with that birth experience in the end also.
grapefruit / 4355 posts
Wouldn't change anything for me.
I plan to try for a natural birth anyway but even if I wanted pain meds and couldn't have them, the temporary pain of labor wouldn't be a deterrent from the lifetime of joy and happiness a child brings.
hostess / papaya / 10540 posts
I had an epidural and I'm still considering stopping after one because it failed on me twice, the second time was when they were performing the c-section on me! Even if I was guaranteed a vaginal birth I for sure wouldn't do it without an epidural.
squash / 13199 posts
I havent been through it yet so I cant really talk from experience. I want to avoid an epi if possible. Growing up in europe none of my friends over there had an epidural or scheduled c-section so thats affected by idea of whats normal.
Today | Monthly Record | |
---|---|---|
Topics | 0 | 1 |
Posts | 1 | 1 |
Ask for Help
Make a Suggestion
Frequently Asked Questions
Bee Levels
Acronyms
Most Viewed Posts
Hellobee Gold
Hellobee Recipes
Hellobee Features
Hellobee Contests
Baby-led Weaning
Bento Boxes
Breastfeeding
Newborn Essentials
Parties
Postpartum Care Essentials
Sensory Play Activities
Sleep Training
Starting Solids Gear
Transitioning to Toddler Bed
All Series
Who We Are
About the Bloggers
About the Hostesses
Contributing Bloggers
Apply to Blog
Apply to Hostess
Submit a Guest Blog
Hellobee Buttons
How We Make Money
Community Policies