Why not? (Poll below - you can vote more than once) No judgment, just curious.
Why not? (Poll below - you can vote more than once) No judgment, just curious.
85 votes
pomegranate / 3643 posts
I voted other. I don't want one the second time around, but I had one with my first.
My reason is that it didn't take very well (I could still feel my legs, my contractions, they were still very painful, but I couldn't move). I hated being stuck in an uncomfortable position and still being in pain. My midwife said that since back labor often happens again, I was likely to have the same outcome again. So I think I'd prefer just to skip it this time. It did help take the edge off, not gonna lie, but I'm hoping that if my second labor is shorter, I can just get through without it!
blogger / wonderful cherry / 21616 posts
I voted that I was worried about potential side effects and aimed for a med-free birth.
wonderful pomelo / 30692 posts
@jedeve: Wait - what?? Are epidurals less effective for back labor??? (Sorry OP to threadjack)
nectarine / 2134 posts
Haven't given birth yet, but would like to go med-free if possible. I've had an epidural before for a surgery and it was fine, so I'm totally okay with them in theory and practice for some needs. I'd just like to avoid one if possible during birth (so I can feel pushing, hopefully avoid other interventions, etc). But we'll see when the time comes!
hostess / wonderful watermelon / 39513 posts
Scared of everything. Ended up with one for LO 1.
nectarine / 2834 posts
I never didn't want one but I also never wanted one. I wanted to see what happened before I made up my mind. When I was in labor, I actually turned down an epidural twice (at 4cm and 6cm) because I actually wasn't in that much pain (joke was on me - It was to come later). My doctor watched as I had contractions and we just decided I was handling them and breathing through them really well that it wasn't necessary to medicate me. When I got to 8-9 cm, I was begging for one though haha.
pomegranate / 3643 posts
@Adira: Scientifically? No idea!!! According to my anesthesiologist they are 100% ineffective during back labor. According to the labor nurse? She has never seen one not work, even during back labor.
I don't want to start rumors, but for me, it definitely wasn't 100% pain relief (more like 75%, then quickly back down to 50% and 25%, though to be fair, I don't know what transition would have been like without one).
It's funny because I don't really want to get one again. DH was initially like, "are you kidding? You were in so much pain, even it helped only a little it was good/necessary!" So I'm kinda back at square one as to "I don't know what to do!" Though I'm leaning towards not getting one.
coconut / 8279 posts
@Adira: that's what I was told and I had only back labor. It's because of the way the baby is positioned, it blocks the way the epidural is supposed to work.
It took the edge off for me and was suggested so that my muscles would relax & they could turn him into a position where he could be born vaginally.
wonderful clementine / 24134 posts
I voted that I didn't want one before birth but ended up with one. But I think there are varying levels of this. Some moms really want a natural birth and train for it and all that stuff. I was open to the idea of an epidural so it wasn't a big deal when I decided to get one.
wonderful pomelo / 30692 posts
@jedeve: I wasn't able to get one for my first due to other issues, but I also had back labor, so now I'm wondering if I should just skip it for #2 since I survived #1 without it!!
wonderful pomelo / 30692 posts
@rachiecakes: I had nooooooooo idea that this was a thing! I had back labor and just wasn't able to get an epidural, but no one ever mentioned to me how it might not even help!! Now I'm starting to wonder if I should just not bother next time around!
wonderful cherry / 21504 posts
I voted I was scared of the side effects and I wanted a med free birth-- but I wasn't worried about side effects like it would drug the baby or something, I was worried it would lead to more interventions, and that I wouldn't be able to feel what to do for pushing. The pain didn't get to the point where I seriously considered one until I was in transition.
The primary reason was I wanted to avoid a cascade of interventions, but I was open to one if I felt I needed it or the midwives thought it would help. I did not get one and am happy about it.
pomegranate / 3643 posts
@Adira: @rachiecakes: Here's the thread I had about it right after the birth: http://boards.hellobee.com/topic/back-labor-and-failed-epidural
grapefruit / 4311 posts
Another haven't given birth answer, but I am torn a little. I really want pain meds, but I really would like to be able to labor/give birth in whatever position feels "right" at the time. I was reading about "walking epidurals" - I guess a lighter meds version and have been wondering if that's an option.
grapefruit / 4278 posts
I went in with the mindset that I wanted to try without one, but wasn't absolutely opposed to it. My main concern was that it would stall labor and I would end up with more interventions. I ended up getting the epidural and it wound up helping labor progress much quicker by letting me relax. I had a wonderful experience, could still move my legs, labored down and pushed for 20 minutes with very minimal tearing. I still think it's a good idea to hold off until labor is well started, but I'm pretty sure I'll get an epidural again next time.
pomegranate / 3791 posts
I am TERRIFIED of needles - like, throw up and pass out TERRIFIED. But my labor was so painful and slow, none of the techniques I'd learned were working (the tub, balance ball, massage/pressure points, etc.), I'd been laboring for over 24 hours with minimal progress, my contractions were one on top of the other with no breaks, and I was just desperate for relief. Finally I got desperate enough to stop caring about the needle.
I did end up needing a c-section for reasons that were unrelated to the epidural. I'm doing a vbac in October and will totally be getting an epi. It was amazing how quickly my labor progressed once I had it and how much more relaxed I was, I believe I actually cried out of relief.
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
I did not want an epi because I wanted to be able to leverage the water tub and I wanted to manage the discomfort with movement and position changes, which were not possible with the epi at the hospital where I delivered.
papaya / 10343 posts
I did not want an epidural because:
- I was scared it would stall my labor and lead to a c-section
- I was scared it would mean I couldn't feel to push effectively and would result in my tearing worse than I would have if I went natural
- I wanted to be able to labor in the birthing tub, walking around, etc, and to be able to eat and drink.
- I was a little concerned with the epidural affecting my hormones/ability to breastfeed/bond with baby (just mildly-- there is no real proof of this but it does sort of make sense to me)
I had an epidural because:
- I ended up with an induction and hooked up to monitors that kept me strapped to my back in bed-- so various labor positions were off the table and back labor while laying on my back sucked
- I had very little confidence I'd make it through an induced labor med free so I didn't honestly try THAT hard to postpone my epi because it seemed inevitable once we were talking cervadil and a foley bulb and pitocin
(And I did end up with a c-section, although I do not believe it had anything to do with my epidural. I got the epidural at 2cm, 7.5 hours after starting the induction at 1cm, and in 4.5 hours I'd dilated to an 8. I did stall out and start to swell closed but it was because of LO's position).
pomegranate / 3516 posts
I was terrified of the side effects and the needle. But I did actually want one but had waited too long and ended up going without. Now I don't want one for my second though because I know I can do it without one and I'm still terrified of the needle/side effects.
grapefruit / 4862 posts
I checked that I was afraid it would lead to a C-section (by slowing down labor, same reason I would have been apprehensive of induction), and that I didn't want one but changed my mind during.
I didn't go in PLANNING to not get an epidural though. My plan was to just see what I could handle. I didn't want to plan to have one without knowing if I could handle the pain of labor. But hello back labor- no question, I needed it! I did talk to the hospital team though to make sure I wasn't getting it too early and really made sure I understood the risks. I was afraid of the needle, but not more afraid of that than I was of feeling every bit of a baby coming out of (and ripping) my lady area.
honeydew / 7909 posts
I wanted a med free birth because I wanted to be able to move around freely, get in the tub and walk.
I had back labor and my epi was effective (I got it when it was decided I'd be needing a cs).
pineapple / 12053 posts
i wanted a med free birth to avoid unnecessary interventions (was open to interventions if medically necessary!) and wanted to see if i could control that aspect by relying on my body to birth my baby. i did it med free and i really contribute my easy recovery to going without it and avoiding the things that come along with it!
papaya / 10473 posts
@jedeve: I had back labor and my epidural didn't do SQUAT for me. So anecdotally, I can confirm that was totally true in my case!
ETA: I wanted a med free birth, but I had a asymmetrically engaged/posterior baby.
cherry / 248 posts
@jedeve I didn't have back labor with my firsts (twins) but my epidural was too high so I couldn't feel my chest but felt most everything below my belly button! The ring of fire was brutal but I thought that's how it was for everyone. I had my daughter med free and it was less painful than with my twins and recovery was so much easier. I actually felt better than I had in weeks after I had her.
eggplant / 11287 posts
I didn't want an epi with my first but when I got induced for high BP, my birth plan went out the window. Had three failed epis.
Wih my second, I wanted a med free birth and had one.
And to add to the back labor convo, I had a posterior baby and back labor, and three failed epis. So, same is true for me as well.
cantaloupe / 6669 posts
My main reasons were that I was afraid of it leading to a C-section, and that I was concerned about side effects for the baby. I did change my mind & get one & I had a C-section Who knows if the epidural contributed. The reason for my C-section was "failure to progress" although I had a uterine infection which was why they kind of wanted to move things along. I sobbed while I was getting prepped for surgery because I thought I caused it.
A lesser reason was also that I had heard it is not great for breastfeeding & I also had issues with breastfeeding.
Despite those things, I will be open to getting one again. The pain of labor was really just terrible for me & realistically I am not sure if I would be able to have an unmedicated birth.
grapefruit / 4731 posts
I wasn't really for or against it but I knew that having an epi might lead to a c-section since you can't feel pushing and that affects some women or so they said.
My plan was just to see how far I can get without one. I totally caved when my water broke but it wasn't the end of the world and I felt so much better after having it. I was able to have a vaginal birth with an epi. I think I was just very lucky!
pear / 1895 posts
While I was pregnant, I read a lot about epidurals and the cascade of interventions, etc, and it all made a lot of sense to me. Another thing that really jumped out at me was that, when you're in labor, your body makes endorphins that help to deal with the pain. When you get pain relief from artificial sources, your body stops responding to the pain the way it was meant to. Basically, I was afraid that I would get the epidural and it would either not work correctly or would wear off, then the labor would be SO much more painful because my body wasn't producing the endorphins to help me handle the pain naturally.
I had a long labor (over 36 hours), but I progressed through it. I'm sure if, after that amount of time, I was still at 2cm or something, I would've gotten the epi for the exhaustion. But I also think I progressed because I was able to move around, change positions, and stayed positive about my situation (so much of birth is mental, I truly believe!).
I definitely plan to go med-free with #2 because I feel like if I could do it last time, I can definitely do it this time! Hoping for a speedier delivery, though, for sure.
pineapple / 12526 posts
I didn't want one but I have a heart condition (that was discovered in my late 3rd trimester) that made it prudent to get one. It didn't end up working so... yeah. Oh well. I wont get one next time. I wish the US did gas and air.
Honestly, I didn't want one because I was confident I could do it without one. It was sort of a personal challenge. Plus, I was scared of the c-section and "cascade of interventions".
kiwi / 524 posts
I didn't want an epidural because I wanted to avoid unnecessary interventions and because I wanted to be able to walk, get in the tub, and eat during labor. As it turned out, I was stuck in bed in certain positions because LO's heart rate was concerning. I was in pain, but not to the extent that I felt like I needed any pharmaceutical help coping.
At six centimeters, his heart rate got worse, and I agreed to a c-section. At that point, I was glad to get the spinal.
If I try for a VBAC next time, I'll try to go without an epidural again, as I was really doing fine.
blogger / honeydew / 7081 posts
@Adira: My epidural was totally ineffective for back labour. Again...don't know if that's scientific or just my experience.
I was with the midwives, who discourage epidurals, and I thought I could manage without. By hour 40 of labour, I stalled out and started swelling, so we agreed that an epi would help. LO was born less than an hour after the epidural was placed.
eggplant / 11408 posts
@jedeve: @redsmarties: @Rainbow Sprinkles: @grizz: @Adira: I had back labor, and the epidural only gave me relief for the tiniest little bit. Even when they turned it up, it only succeeded in totally numbing my legs, not taking away the pain.
I voted other. I really wanted to be able to move around during labor, because sitting makes my skin crawl. I ended up begging for one, though, because I was so sick and exhausted. Next time, I would like to try for med free, if only to avoid the excess wires that come with it! Especially the catheter. Good gracious I hated that thing.
papaya / 10343 posts
@grizz: I had the opposite experience! I had back labor with a posterior and tilted baby as well but my epidural did wonders for me. I still had some pain as it started to wear off, but it was totally manageable and when I asked for them to turn it up it took care of like 95% of it.
I'd be really scared if the epidural didn't work because I wound up with a c-section due to the position of my baby (+ meconium + I spiked a fever + her heart rate went wonky after 17 hours of laboring). I think if the epidural hadn't worked they would've had to knock me out? Would not have loved that!
Today | Monthly Record | |
---|---|---|
Topics | 1 | 0 |
Posts | 0 | 1 |
Ask for Help
Make a Suggestion
Frequently Asked Questions
Bee Levels
Acronyms
Most Viewed Posts
Hellobee Gold
Hellobee Recipes
Hellobee Features
Hellobee Contests
Baby-led Weaning
Bento Boxes
Breastfeeding
Newborn Essentials
Parties
Postpartum Care Essentials
Sensory Play Activities
Sleep Training
Starting Solids Gear
Transitioning to Toddler Bed
All Series
Who We Are
About the Bloggers
About the Hostesses
Contributing Bloggers
Apply to Blog
Apply to Hostess
Submit a Guest Blog
Hellobee Buttons
How We Make Money
Community Policies