pineapple / 12566 posts
@BandDmommy: totally agree. I would have loved to have two LOs before I turned 30, but didn't meet my SO until I was 29!
We were 2 and through when I was 33. I really don't know if I would have TTC if I were 35 and still wanted to add to our family.
grapefruit / 4441 posts
If I had a choice to have my children earlier, I would have. However, we didn't marry until I was 33. I had my first LO at 34 and will have baby#2 at age 36/37 (she's due 6 days after my birthday). We probably won't have a third, largely due to age. 37 was kind of my 2nd cut off. We'll see though. Maybe we'd consider adoption down the road.
cantaloupe / 6791 posts
I think if I had met my SO later in life and really wanted kids, I would try to make it happen despite age. My cut-off at that point would probably be 40.
However, we have been together since high school and got married at 21/22, so we'll be done by 30 (#1 at 24, #2 is due a month before I turn 26, and we want a third eventually).
pear / 1622 posts
Yes. I met my husband when I was 34 and had my first at 36. We will TTC when LO is older. I wasn't ready to be a mom in my 20s and I do not regret any of my decisions - love my husband and finally have a job that gives me work life balance.
pear / 1580 posts
DH and I are hoping for LO#2 before 35. But if that doesn't happen, then we're planning on being happy with 1!
cantaloupe / 6206 posts
@looch: Yes thanks.
Before turning 35 I think I thought of it as some deadline. Then i turned 35 and I felt the same as I did when I was 30. And 33. And 34.
Either way I had my first at 35 and will hopefully have #2 at 37 or 38. I don't regret anything, although sleep deprivation is harder on me now than it was 10 years ago. But 10 years ago I used it for other noble causes.
grapefruit / 4770 posts
@looch: I totally agree! I remember when I thought 25 was old when I was younger lol. Any year you're alive sounds good to me! Honestly, having kids when you're 30,35,40,45 and so on doesn't make you old, and having kids in your 20s doesn't mean you're not mature and patient enough, or not well-settled. It's what is best for YOU and your family. Who cares about the rest
grapefruit / 4819 posts
I'm 35 and am not sure whether or not we're done yet. I had my first at 32 and wouldn't have it any other way. I always planned on living my 20s for me, and me alone, and that is exactly what I did. Even if I had met DH sooner (we met when I was 29) I still wouldn't have considered having kids before 30.
Age doesn't really play a factor in when we stop having babies. I have just as much energy now, if not more so, than I did in my 20s and see no reason why turning 35 should be a turning point where we no longer consider having children. That being said, I have my hands full with my 2.5 yr old and my 10 month old so if we do have a third, it won't be for another 2 years at least!
GOLD / wonderful coconut / 33402 posts
@looch: thank you!! I don't see what the big deal is about 35
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
Haha, ladies, I turned 35, and not only did I live to tell about it, I am going to turn 40 this year. I delivered in Europe, and AMA is not 35 there, it's 40. I do belive that as you get older, your body takes longer to recover, but if you had problems at 35, chances are you would have had problems at 25.
I think the big deal about 35 is that we've all been told for so long that at age 35, your egg quality/count diminishes and you're more likely to deliver a child with special needs.
pomelo / 5257 posts
@looch: lol, right?
My mom was 42 when she had me and my sister is younger. At this point I think we may be done by 35, but you never know what might happen. I'm not too concerned about age. I think this is a really good read about a lot of the age-related concerns: http://m.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/07/how-long-can-you-wait-to-have-a-baby/309374/
coconut / 8279 posts
I had J at 31 and am not sure if we're done. I'm turning 35 this year.
pomelo / 5660 posts
@looch: thank you for posting this! Turning 35 isn't the end of the world.
GOLD / wonderful coconut / 33402 posts
@looch: I asked my doctor about this at my annual visit this year, since I had turned 35 that year. She told me to not even worry about it. She did recommend that I decide by 38, if we are having another or not, since eggs count will start to diminish.
wonderful grape / 20453 posts
@looch: you lived to tell about it? Surely in a wheelchair with dentures
pomelo / 5660 posts
I just had a baby and I'm 36. My pregnancy was no different than my pregnancy when I was 34. I had no additional monitoring and not once was AMA mentioned.
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
@blackbird: exactly! I mean, I do moan and groan about my aches and pains, but this is the path my life took and I am grateful for the twists and turns. Do I wish that sometimes I had met my husband earlier and that we could have had our 20s to spend together, sure!
wonderful grape / 20453 posts
@looch: well shit I'm in my 20's and have plenty of aches and pains, lol. Such is life
squash / 13208 posts
If I had a choice? No
But I wanted two kids which meant one was born when I was 35 - They do exhaust me but then again I think they would exhaust me at 25 too
When I was in high school my plan was to be DONE having kids by 25..... ha!
pomegranate / 3231 posts
I met my husband when I was 32.5 and got married at 34.5. We took a year to just be married, and then it took eight months (and a mc) to conceive. I delivered my first baby two months before my 37th birthday. We are undecided about a second but if we decide to pull the trigger then I hope to deliver for the last time before my 40th birthday.
In my 20s and early 30s I spent nine years living in NYC, travelled to 23 countries on five continents, completed a masters degree, and finally found a company I love working at. It would have been nice to meet my husband a few years earlier, but I can't change that and he was definitely worth waiting for. And while it would be nice to hop on a plane on a whim, I have a lot of good memories from my 20s and am happy to settle down without feeling like my child is holding me back from too much.
pomelo / 5678 posts
I don't get it. I mean, I am not sure I understand the question. If women's bodies had no time constraint, is that what you mean?
Um, yes, if we could make babies 'till 80 I would probably have waited even longer. I waited until 29.
pomegranate / 3565 posts
@looch: thanks for saying that! Honestly, I think you'll be tired whatever age you have your kids. Fertility wise, I think it's a crap shoot too. I had zero problems getting pregnant in my 30s. But I have several friends who had problems in their 20s and early 30s.
@BandDmommy: I had my 2nd son at 35 and my age was really never mentioned. Well until I developed GD which age is a factor. I wonder if it will be next time.
clementine / 903 posts
@looch: Amen to that!! I hate that in America people act like it is! Age is what you make of it. I was married to my husband by 22, not partying or doing extreme travel, and we were making plenty of money (well into six figures) by age of 26. Still had no desire for kids until I hit 29. Sometimes I feel like I should have started sooner, but I know this is purely what society drills into us, and I think this puts unnecessary stress on women and is sad (in other countries they are way more relaxed about this). I hate that by waiting until 30 or above to get pregnant there is a stereotype that you just didn't have it together enough and just pissed away your 20s. Maybe you did have it all together but still had no desire then. There are many endeavors worth pursuing before and / or after children. I think the best age to have kids is the age you have them. Sorry if this post sounds defensive. I suppose it kind of is, but it irritates me a bit that you never find threads titled "would you consider having kids before 25?", which I believe would inspire many "heck nos" as well. Yet women over 35 are the only ones subject to bunches of others saying, "no, I would never."
pear / 1750 posts
I probably will be, for LO #2. I'm 32 now with LO due in March. I'd like to have the first potty trained before getting pregnant again, so that puts me at 35. I'll probably be using frozen embryos from our recent IVF cycle, however.
hostess / papaya / 10219 posts
37 here and I always find these threads mildly insulting to those of us who are older and having children. It kind of feels like people are saying, well of course no one would want to have children after 35 but it's just some people's situation. I dunno. I like my life the way that it is. I love that I had lots of time in my 20s to do all of the things I wanted to do. I traveled, I built a career, I learned to dance, I dated, I met my husband… I have zero regrets. I'm probably being overly sensitive. Pregnancy hormones...
clementine / 903 posts
@travellingbee: Couldn't agree more. I know SO many new moms over 35 who wouldn't change a thing and act / look younger than women 10 years younger. Again, there is never a thread titled "would you consider kids before 25?" to which a bunch of women who made this decision have to listen to all the "hell nos".
GOLD / wonderful pomegranate / 28905 posts
@travellingbee: sorry you're insulted! Truly. It was just meant in fun. I know moms older than me who are more fit and have more energy so yes 35 isn't the age where I think all women get sent to the retirement home.
It's just an ambiguous age I chose because of the board that IF everything went perfectly would you preferred to have kids before. Things like not meeting your so, infertility, etc. .
I think this is one of those Internet lost in translation things where some moms took it more seriously than intended...
hostess / papaya / 10219 posts
@regberadaisy: No I know it wasn't your intent and no hard feelings. There is a general sentiment that having children in your late 30s isn't ideal or preferred and it doesn't feel nice to have people poo-pooing your choices all the time. It's ok. Really. I just thought I'd make people aware of how threads like this can hurt feelings.
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
@regberadaisy: I don't think there was anything lost in translation, you asked a question, people answered based on their experiences. Were you expecting that everyone would have said yes, that they would have preferred to have their kids all before 35?
GOLD / wonderful olive / 19030 posts
I'm actually going to be done by 30, however I would want to be done by 32 if we decide for a third. My mom always told me being pregnant in her 30s was way worse than her 20s (my youngest sister was born when mom was 30)
GOLD / wonderful pomegranate / 28905 posts
@travellingbee: no, you're right. I was thinking more of people who had to TTC later due to reasons out of their control. Obviously there are tons of ladies now who choose to travel, concentrate on schooling, earning money, etc. First before kids. And those are obviously those who still would TTC at 35+. Because it was their "choice". I was thinking more of you TTC 35+ because life didn't aligned the way you'd planned. Like not meeting your SO, infertility, not being able to afford L&D, etc etc.
pomelo / 5678 posts
That's why I was saying I didn't get it. I mean, there are too many things out of our control to be able to choose, so I wasn't sure if there was additional criteria involved, like we were physically aged 20 for many years or something... but at the same time, I don't want to shade ttc at 35 in a negative light. I think waiting to marry and have kids until 30+ is wise IMO. @travellingbee: I agree.
pomelo / 5660 posts
@travellingbee: I agree. Threads like this are mildly insulting to women who are having children after 35.
pomegranate / 3565 posts
@travellingbee: definitely agree with you. I often feeling like a senior citizen mom at 36 when I read these threads.
nectarine / 2180 posts
I would prefer to be done by 35, just because I'm looking forward to going back to work. We decided that I would stay home with the kids while they're young, but I really look forward to the satisfaction of bringing home a paycheck again. So I see waiting to TTC after 35 as a deterrent to that. I turn 32 next month and LO #2 is 3.5 months so I'll likely be at least 33/34 if we decide to have a 3rd.
I would also say that my feelings are colored by my own experience. My mom had 4 kids by her 30th birthday and she was 22 when she had me. There are some things I liked about having a younger mom, so while there is nothing wrong with having kids after 35, I would just prefer to be done sooner rather than later.
grapefruit / 4089 posts
At the same time, some women who had kids in their 30's make it seem like people who have kids in their 20's are sacrificing their career and their chance to travel and enjoy their "youth". It goes both ways. I can have a kid at 27 and still be financially stable, have a career that I love, travel if I feel like it, etc.
Today | Monthly Record | |
---|---|---|
Topics | 0 | 0 |
Posts | 1 | 0 |
Ask for Help
Make a Suggestion
Frequently Asked Questions
Bee Levels
Acronyms
Most Viewed Posts
Hellobee Gold
Hellobee Recipes
Hellobee Features
Hellobee Contests
Baby-led Weaning
Bento Boxes
Breastfeeding
Newborn Essentials
Parties
Postpartum Care Essentials
Sensory Play Activities
Sleep Training
Starting Solids Gear
Transitioning to Toddler Bed
All Series
Who We Are
About the Bloggers
About the Hostesses
Contributing Bloggers
Apply to Blog
Apply to Hostess
Submit a Guest Blog
Hellobee Buttons
How We Make Money
Community Policies