Hellobee Boards

Login/Register

Which would have been less expensive for you: breastfeeding or formula?

  1. loveisstrange

    pineapple / 12526 posts

    Breastfeeding would have been cheaper, but not by that much.

    We were given formula for WIC for free every month and usually only had to buy 1 extra can at $23 per can per month. I estimate FF cost us less than $500 (including bottles) in the first year.

  2. SAHM0811

    grapefruit / 4049 posts

    my first baby was FF and my second was BF.

    i think FF was more expensive.

    a lot of the breastfeeding supplies i got for 2.0 were covered by my FSA, including hospital grade pump rental fee ($90/month), my new Medela Freestyle ($350ish), and all related supplies (shells, pads, lanolin). i also scored a lot of BF'ing supplies from the hospital. i also think that while BF'ing supplies can add up, a lot of them aren't really necessities to being able to BF (e.g. nursing tanks).

  3. DillonLion

    GOLD / eggplant / 11517 posts

    @winniebee: Diapers and wipes, too! I have very little incentive to be a crunchy momma LOL

  4. purrpletulips

    pomegranate / 3414 posts

    For me it was probably about even. DD was BF/supplemented with formula, DS has been only BF

    with DD: I bought a pump, nursing bras (would have needed new bras after pregnancy anyways), extra pump parts, supplements

    with DS: I bought a different pump, nursing bras (was bigger PP this time around), extra pump parts, supplements

    Since I went back to work around 8w, I had to buy bottles so that is a cost that occurred despite the feeding method used. My sister can get formula from her work so I didn't buy any formula for DD.

  5. MrsStar

    nectarine / 2994 posts

    Breastfeeding is cheaper for us. Only costs associated with it for me were nursing bras (only got the cheap ones) and nursing pads. I got given sil's breastpump which she never used and I no longer pump. Haven't had to use formula at all so far although we do have some in the cupboard from when lo was clusterfeeding at 3 weeks and I was worried she wasn't getting any milk.

  6. kml636

    pomegranate / 3225 posts

    Luckily, we haven't had many problems with BF so I know it was cheaper.

  7. AmeliaBedilia

    nectarine / 2192 posts

    Very interesting thread!

  8. meganmp

    persimmon / 1420 posts

    Breast feeding for sure! Free pump, hospital parts, hand me down bottles and boppy- breast feeding works out to be cheap for us.

  9. sera_87

    pomegranate / 3604 posts

    Definitely bfing. I received 2 pumps as gifts (nothing fancy, but i only pump the odd time to relieve engorgement). I'm on a years mat leave so no work-stress components. Bought 3 nursing bras at 19$ each, a tube of lanolin (5$?) that I used probably 6 times, and the only ongoing cost is pads, but there again I've only spent maybe 40$ over 8 months on those.

    FF would be a can every week or so and even at 14$ that would add up quickly. We've always done a mix but primarily bf - I'd say 90-95% bfing, 5-10% formula....currently go through a can a month ? Or so.

  10. CupQuakeWalk

    coconut / 8475 posts

    @highwire: we went through everything you did as far as bFing AND now we formula feed so we paid both. On top of that: LO was MSPI for 4m so that formula is double the price...FML!

  11. 78h2o

    grapefruit / 4441 posts

    Breastfeeding is cheaper for me.
    Double electric pump - free from insurance co.
    Storage bags - free from insurance co.
    Storage bottles (extra) - free from sister
    Nursing bras - $60, but I bought them and needed them during pregnancy anyway
    Hands free bra - 40?
    Lanolin, booby tubes, etc. - free - shower gifts
    Hooter Hider - $12 via Amazon sale
    Boppy - $20 via Mashalls clearance
    Supplements (MMP, brewers yeast, etc) - $30

  12. LittleFox

    kiwi / 673 posts

    Breastfeeding is cheaper for us. I bought a manual pump tp help build my supply early on, an extra boppy cover (pillow was a hand me down), some super cheap nursing bras (Zulily) and tanks (Walmart), breast pads (cheapest reusable I could find + some disposables), and a nursing cover. I also bought lanolin, but in 3.5 months have not needed it. I didn't spend much, but could have spent even less. If I really had to, I could do without the boppy (use regular pillows or nothing), the cover (blankets or nothing), and the tanks. I needed new bras in pregnancy anyway, so that would've been an expense regardless. I am thankful it has gone well so far.

  13. Mrs. High Heels

    blogger / eggplant / 11551 posts

    hmm let me add up what i spent on breastfeeding:
    simple wishes hands-free bra ($35)
    medela PISA ($250)
    boppy ($39)
    mother love nipple cream ($9)
    honeysuckle breastmilk storage bags - 100 count ($20)
    first years breastmilk organizer ($16)
    dr. brown bottles ($20)

    total = $389

    FORMULA
    baby's only organic formula - pack of 3 ($35)... i'm assuming if i needed 6 cans per month for a year... it would total to be $840 on formula alone without including all the bottle gear.

    breastfeeding is cheaper for me! and the second time around, i got my breastpump for free.

  14. iheartleopardprint

    apricot / 343 posts

    I am a sahm, so breastfeeding is cheaper for me. It costs nothing, I do have a pump which I had from when DS was little but I think I have used it once?

    Bottle feeding is a nightmare to me, all those bottles and things to sterilise as well as the formula to buy. I want to avoid bottle feeding if possible.

  15. googly-eyes

    GOLD / pomelo / 5737 posts

    I think BFing would have been cheaper but I had resorted to pumping exclusively and the time it took was crazy. Maybe if I'd gotten the handsfree pump though! I have gone through three brands of bottles, and the cost of formula changes based on LO's age, cheapest at first and then most expensive around 5 months and has dropped a little since LO is on solids too and she dropped some oz (which ped says is ok.) Still I think FFing is more expensive, but worth it.

  16. Ree723

    grapefruit / 4819 posts

    Definitely breastfeeding! I'm not sure of the cost of formula as I've never bought any, but BF'ing has cost so little, it's definitely the winner.

    Single manual pump -$80
    One mini tube of Lanolin -$6
    One box of unopened breast pads (never needed them) - $10

    I started wearing nursing bras whilst pregnant, so I don't count those as a BF'ing cost. Bottles and liners we would have needed anyway, and would probably have had a lot more than the three bottles we currently have (but never use). And the boppy was a gift that I definitely could have done without but used as it was there.

    So altogether, BF'ing has cost us less than $100 and we are almost 10 months in. Next time, we won't have the expense of the pump, and hopefully I won't need the nursing pads again, so maybe we'll be able to get by on $6 or so for BF'ing!

  17. littleveesmommy

    persimmon / 1472 posts

    Breastfeeding was cheaper for us. I calculated out how much formula DD would have need for her first year and it came out to $1350 for Similac Advanced (though it would have been more expensive for us since she had lots of allergies that made her eczema flair up and I was on an elimination diet for many months, so she would have needed special formula).

    Pump and parts: $250 but gifted by my sister
    Spare Bottles / Parts: $50
    2 Hands free pumping bra: $60
    Storage bags/camis/nursing bras: $50
    Mother's Milk Tea / More Milk Plus: $50
    Boppy / pads / lanolin: gifted
    Total: $210

Reply

You must login / Register to post

© copyright 2011-2014 Hellobee