If we have a third, I'll be at least 35.
nectarine / 2288 posts
Nope. If we have another biological child it will be in the next 3 years so the oldest I would be is 32.
I applaud anyone willing to be prego after 35. But not for me
pomegranate / 3438 posts
If we have a third, yes. We are trying for #2 right now and I will be 33 this year.
cantaloupe / 6630 posts
Yes. I'm 35 now and my youngest is just seven months old. Pregnancy is horrendous for me, regardless of age, so I don't feel too old in that respect. For our own child spacing and wanting to get back into the workforce, we would like it to happen sooner rather than later though.
honeydew / 7622 posts
Yes if we have a 3rd. Unlikely we will wait another 3 years for #2 but anything is possible.
cantaloupe / 6869 posts
Maybe but hopefully not? I'm 33 and thinking I'm done with bio kids after this baby. But never say never. If we have another bio kid, I'll definitely be over 35.
pomegranate / 3244 posts
Probably--we haven't started yet and I'll be 32 this year We want at least 2 so I'm sure I'll be older than 35 for #2!
pear / 1986 posts
Yup! We are about to head into an FET and I'll be 38 in a month. DD was born just after I turned 35.
GOLD / wonderful coconut / 33402 posts
Yes. 37 and starting in March
hostess / wonderful grape / 20803 posts
Yeah I'm 35 now. Just got pregnant again, hopefully this is it!
honeydew / 7235 posts
No! Just had my second at 35 and we are done.
grapefruit / 4717 posts
Pregnant and over 35 now As long as all goes well, we're done after this.
pomegranate / 3350 posts
Nope I wanted to be done having babies before 35.
cantaloupe / 6059 posts
No, I don't think so. If I did that my oldest would already be 12. I would hate that age gap.
apricot / 343 posts
LO2 was a surprise pregnancy when I was 35. If she hadn't come along when she did, we probably would have waited a few more years; so I would have been 37 or 38.
nectarine / 2951 posts
I'm pregnant with #2 right now and I'm 35. I think we'll be done after 2 kids.
persimmon / 1196 posts
LO will be 17 months when I turn 35. If we decide to try for another, I can't imagine it would be before then.
pomegranate / 3858 posts
If we go for a third, I'll be 35+ (turn 35 this year)
pineapple / 12793 posts
I hope to ttc again next year. I'm 35 now.
pomegranate / 3706 posts
I was done at 30! But I absolutely would have had no qualms doing it later if things had worked out that way. When I had my second, and the nurse asked me how old I was, she told me I was the youngest mom she'd worked with all week, by a decade. I think it's WAY more common to TTC after 35 now especially in bigger cities (I gave birth in Seattle), and I'm definitely on the younger side among my college friends-- most don't have 1 baby yet, at over 30.
pear / 1521 posts
If we have a third, yes, most likely. We're thinking 3 year gap between 1 and 2, but will not wait that long I don't think if we have a 3rd so that I'll be 35 or 36. 37 is kind of my mental cut-off. But who knows what the future will actually bring!
cantaloupe / 6687 posts
Yup. Not in our plans but worked out this way
pomegranate / 3314 posts
Possibly? I want a third and I turn 35 in June, so very likely. I'm really not too worried about it, but it's very common to have children at 35+ in my area.
pear / 1879 posts
Currently pregnant (still early, though) and am 35 so yes
nectarine / 2771 posts
Nope, just had dd2 in Dec in done with bio kids. I'm 32 right now.
pomegranate / 3192 posts
I'm not quite sure, I'm 32 now and although we might be done, I hope we TTC in the next 2-2.5 years...
I think having a baby around 35 is SO common now. At the hospital I work at, "advanced medical age" isn't even until 40 and even then nobody really bats an eye.
nectarine / 2641 posts
Probably not. I'm 30 now and have two--our youngest is 8 months. I can't imagine wanting more than a 4 year age gap--and that's only if I can convince DH to have a 3rd. Our "deal" is that no permanent measures will take place before LO2 is 5 years old, so we'll probably make the decision to be done (regardless of whether or not there's a #3) by the time I'm 35.
nectarine / 2461 posts
yes, 100% certain.
cantaloupe / 6791 posts
Nope (at least I hope not) because I'm 26 and we want one more in the next couple of years.
coconut / 8861 posts
I had my youngest at 35 last year. I'm done having kids.
pomegranate / 3658 posts
I *think* I want to start TTC for #2 when I turn 34, so if things go well I'll be done before I'm 35, but who knows.
pineapple / 12566 posts
No. I'm 35 now and we are done!
honeydew / 7463 posts
Yeah. I'll be 35 this year and I won't be doing another transfer until after my birthday. But any retrievals will be before my birthday (probably).
cantaloupe / 6206 posts
38 and currently pregnant with #2 so was 35+ for both!
pomegranate / 3355 posts
Yes. Was 36 when conceived LO#1, 38 now and trying for #2
nectarine / 2465 posts
I don't think so, I mean you never know what the future will bring, but my limit is 34/35.
pomegranate / 3601 posts
No, if we go for a third it'll be this year and I am 32.
honeydew / 7917 posts
I'm done and was 27 when I had my last.
wonderful kiwi / 23653 posts
Possibly......? I'm 31 turning 32 this year, and if all goes well have #2 while I'm 32. I guess I can squeeze out a 3rd if I really want before 35, if all goes well, and if we want a 3rd?
grapefruit / 4988 posts
Yes. I just turned 35 and we are still trying for #2.
You must login / Register to post
see more leaders...
No members yet for today
Ask for Help
Make a Suggestion
Frequently Asked Questions
Most Viewed Posts
Postpartum Care Essentials
Sensory Play Activities
Starting Solids Gear
Transitioning to Toddler Bed
Who We Are
About the Bloggers
About the Hostesses
Apply to Blog
Apply to Hostess
Submit a Guest Blog
How We Make Money