wonderful pomelo / 30692 posts
@MoonMoon: @Arden: I'm not sure where you guys are seeing something that indicates a vaginal birth is less risky for the baby... Here's a few quotes from the article:
"Vaginal breech births overall are more dangerous for babies than caesarean sections. Studies in recent years, however, have shown that a vaginal delivery can be safe under certain circumstances..." <-- CAN be safe - not SAFER
"...cited studies that showed breech birth under certain protocols is no riskier than a planned C-section." <-- this doesn't mean it's less risky than a c-section, just equal to
"A well-publicized study in 2000 initially found C-sections to be safer than vaginal deliveries for breech babies..."
As far as I can tell, a vaginal birth is safer for the MOTHER, but NOT the baby.
pomelo / 5073 posts
My baby was complete breech. My dr's policy was breech baby=c-section. If we hadn't had one, it would have ended badly for both of us. She was so big and I'm so short, there was no way she was come vsginally. I didn't attempt to turn her because I felt her flip head down and then she flipped back. I had the mindset that she flipped for a reason and I wasn't missing with that.
Today | Monthly Record | |
---|---|---|
Topics | 1 | 0 |
Posts | 0 | 1 |
Ask for Help
Make a Suggestion
Frequently Asked Questions
Bee Levels
Acronyms
Most Viewed Posts
Hellobee Gold
Hellobee Recipes
Hellobee Features
Hellobee Contests
Baby-led Weaning
Bento Boxes
Breastfeeding
Newborn Essentials
Parties
Postpartum Care Essentials
Sensory Play Activities
Sleep Training
Starting Solids Gear
Transitioning to Toddler Bed
All Series
Who We Are
About the Bloggers
About the Hostesses
Contributing Bloggers
Apply to Blog
Apply to Hostess
Submit a Guest Blog
Hellobee Buttons
How We Make Money
Community Policies