Regular or early walker? LO is just learning to stand. Are the feet holes necessary?
-
We still used a sleep sack on my son (during trips where he stayed in a cold room, aka my in-laws who REFUSE to turn up the heat) even after he was a very stable walker and it was fine. I say the feet holes aren't necessary.
-
My 13-month old, who is walking, still sleeps exclusively in the regular sacks, so my vote is for those.
I plan to continue putting him in the regular sacks in order to create an additional barrier for him when he tries to climb out of his crib.
-
My LO is 22 months and she uses a Halo without holes.
-
My 7.5 month stands up in her crib in a regular one. She isn't walking though.
-
R's been standing up and cruising for two months and she's in the regular ones with no issues. she still cruises around in her crib!
-
I got them once DD started walking but she didn't want her feet sticking through the holes. So I vote no holes necessary.
-
My LO is 16.5 months old and has been using the sacks without holes since he was 4 months. He's never tripped and can pretty much run around in his crib with no problems.
-
LO is 11m and has been cruising for months, walking now, and wears the non-walker sacks just fine!
-
M is 13 months and we use the regular ones. I worry that she would play in her crib instead of sleeping if she could walk more easily!
-
11.5 months, new walker, and we still use the reg ones
-
Regular ones still at 15 months. I don't want their feet to get cold!
Reply
Subscribe to our newsletter
- Google Plus
- Stumbleupon
- Twitter
- Facebook
- Pinterest
- Favorite0
11 comments