-
@matador84: who knew, right?? I knew nothing about all of these things before giving birth (joined HB less than 3 weeks before) - no one spoke of this in birth class, wth?
-
I think 12 hour medicated, as strange as that sounds. As soon as I had my epidural, I felt great! I really enjoyed (is that sick?!) the anticipation of waiting for LO and once I felt comfortable, I was happy.
Also, I did 3+ hours of non-medicated and I was not a happy camper
-
I had two unmedicated births. The first was 9.5 hrs, and the second was 5 hrs, so a 3 hr unmedicated birth sounds pretty heavenly!
-
Medicated!!!
-
I can't decide but I think I lean toward the three hour one. Less exhausting. I labored for much longer than 12 hours unmedicated then had 7 medicated. The medicated ones sure went faster so I can't decide!
And I'm another who did NOT want to feel lo coming out AT ALL.
-
Three hours please! We're hoping for unmedicated (gas and air if necessary) so having it that short would be unexpectedly amazing!
-
Definitely 12 hours medicated!!!
-
Can I just say (add) that neither of those options sound amazing or heavenly to me? Maybe my forgetting hormones are broken or maybe it just hasn't been long enough but I don't look forward to labor again!!! Haha. LO is definitely worth it but still not something I necessarily enjoy!!
-
Gimme the drugz!!
-
I did 12 hours unmedicated, so 3 unmedicated sounds amayzing. but, i would happily take my last labour again anyway
-
I did 7 hours from water breaking (no contractions) to baby without meds so I would say the 3 hour one.
-
3 hours unmedicated! I had an 11 hour induction with back labor and no pain relief so I could survive 3 hours!
- Google Plus
- Stumbleupon
- Twitter
- Facebook
- Pinterest
- Favorite0
51 comments