If money was no option, what do you think would have been the minimum amount of time that you would have been comfortable going back to work?
If money was no option, what do you think would have been the minimum amount of time that you would have been comfortable going back to work?
149 votes
squash / 13208 posts
I was home with DS for 14 weeks and DD for 12 weeks and I thought that was plenty! I was so tired of being home all the time and was excited to be back at work and on a schedule
eta: your post says minimum and poll says ideal... The MINIMUM amount of time would be 10 weeks - ideal was 12 weeks.
persimmon / 1167 posts
I had a bit of a breakdown after finding out that my employer only provides 6 weeks (2 being an unpaid waiting period). So I'm trying to figure out...on average...at minimum, what might work for me.
persimmon / 1167 posts
@MAMAOF2- But apparently my husband can imagine me going back after 6 weeks...which has been a bit of...hm...a sore spot, to say the least.
pear / 1955 posts
We only get 6 weeks paid leave (via short-term disability) with a 1-week waiting period - however, I really think it's worth it to take the whole 12-week FMLA period, if you can at all swing it!
pomelo / 5791 posts
I had a c-section and my work gives no maternity leave. It's either FMLA or your sick/vaca time. I went back at 3 months using accrued leave. I would have never gone back if I didn't need to, but I think 6 months would be ideal.
pear / 1672 posts
I was not working for an organization (self-employed) before starting a new job when LO was 5.5 months. I think I could have done one more month, so I would say 6-7 months.
pomegranate / 3113 posts
I went back at 13 weeks and it was okay. I really wish I could have been part-time for a few months, though. I was mentally ready to be doing something non-baby-related again, but definitely not ready to be doing it full time. It took me awhile to get readjusted. For me, ideal would have been three months off and then three months of working 20ish hours per week.
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
I didn't go back until my son was 2, but in hindsight, I could have gone back to work at 6 months post partum. I was ready, I didn't think I was at the time, but I was, looking back.
pineapple / 12526 posts
I think 6 months would be wonderful. Thats when we had her all straightened out. She was STTN regularly, swaddle weaned, nap trained, had a good schedule.... Plus, its not too long at home that I start to feel stifled. I started working when she was 17 months.... that was way too long.
grapefruit / 4311 posts
@PurplePeony: oh yes, I like your idea!
I was planning 12 weeks, but decided to go back at 11 weeks (which will be this coming Monday ) because I was starting to go stir crazy being F's only caregiver, and also only 5 weeks of my time off has been paid.
Ideally i would love to be going back 3 days a week until he's 6 months or so.
cantaloupe / 6751 posts
I went back part time at 4 months... I didn't feel ready at all and cried so much having to be away. I think 6 months would have been better.
6 wks is way too short
GOLD / wonderful pomegranate / 28905 posts
@HolisticMama: at minimum, 8 weeks. At 6 they are still so "newborn". I feel at 8 weeks they start to seem more solid and like an infant.
I would love 3-4 months?
With #1 I went back at 7 weeks. 6 weeks of STD and 1 week of vacation time. We didn't qualify for FMLA.
With this one it depends on job search.
pineapple / 12793 posts
Minimum I think 16 weeks. Ideally six months.
That said, I had a year and felt ready to go back at six months. For me a year was over kill.
kiwi / 641 posts
I was in a similar boat with @valentinemommy in that my work offers no extra maternity leave-- you have to use sick/vacation time and then FMLA. I was off for about 4 months--about half of that was sick/vacation and the rest unpaid. If we have another, I would probably try for a similar amount of time. If money were truly not an option (or I actually did have some paid leave in addition to sick/vacation), I would say 5-6 months would have been ideal (or 4 months and then back PT for awhile like others have suggested).
cantaloupe / 6669 posts
Ideally, 1 year like in many other countries such as Canada. Or never
I went back part time at about 6 months and I was ready, but only because it was 5-10 hours per week. My freelance work is just now ramping up to close to full time and my LO is 11 months and I am still not ready
cherry / 241 posts
I think 12 weeks would have been ideal for me. I went back at 8 weeks, and I feel it was a tad early. But I was going stir crazy--don't know if I could have done longer than 12 weeks at home! I will say, though, that DD was born in November, so it was SO cold and we hardly ever left the house during that time. If it were summer my answer may be different.
GOLD / wonderful pea / 17697 posts
@loveisstrange: Same here. I was still nursing on demand at 6 months, but he was sleeping longer stretches in the crib in his own room (having previously slept in our bed with us), and napping well.
I stayed home with him until he was 19 months, and, in hindsight, I wasn't a great SAHM, and we've ALL really benefited from me going back to work, even though it's exhausting not having D at home to help in the evenings, after I've worked a full day, including a 1-2 hour commute, traffic depending. I loved that I could spend time with him when he was little, because he's so big now and it went so fast, but I think we would have been better off sooner if I had gone back earlier.
pineapple / 12526 posts
@lovehoneybee: I feel exactly the same as you. We were all much happier after I went back to working, even though it was only part time. I was a miserable bitch when I was SAH, not gonna lie.
pomegranate / 3127 posts
Ideally, at least 6 months. At least at that age they can sit, move around a little and eat a little solid food. It really made a difference in how ready LO was to be left with someone else in my eyes. But even more ideally, somewhere between 1 and 2... DS is now in day care and while it's great for him overall, his speech development is suffering and they don't seem concerned at all... no one at the day care can be bothered to get him to talk more, and what little progress we make is from weekends we spend together.
squash / 13208 posts
@HolisticMama: can he imagine himself waking up 4-6 times a night to feed the baby and then work 8 hours?
I think he is crazy!!
Are you eligible for FMLA? If so is it more your DH saying he wants you to go back early or more that you need the $$.?
nectarine / 2521 posts
Ideally, at least one year. I'm really enjoying the 6-9 month stage and all the development, and he's a lot of fun. I would have hated to miss it!
Minimum would be 12 weeks. I started working part-time at 16 weeks, and it was rough, but doable.
persimmon / 1167 posts
@Mamaof2: Yup...it's my husband saying we need the money...and since he controls the finances entirely, it's hard for me to argue against.
pomegranate / 3779 posts
My employer offered 8 weeks STD @ 60% pay, but I was not ready to go back when my FMLA was up, so I quit and started looking again when LO was 6 months and started a new job when she was 8 months. Ideally, I would have liked to stay at home long term, but it is not in the cards right now.
squash / 13208 posts
@HolisticMama:
It's doable but will def suck.
There are LOTS of 6 week old babies at our DCP.
~hugs~
cherry / 207 posts
Ideally never One year would have been ideal I think if one had to go back to work. I took 9 weeks and I was NOT ready to go back. LO is now 10.5 months old and I am only now starting to feel better about leaving him every day.
pomegranate / 3032 posts
For me, when i planned my maternity leave I thought i had hit the jackpot. I was due 10/9 and took 12 weeks off (6 Short term disability and 6 unpaid - but they paid me for holidays like thanksgiving and christmas) put me at returning to work the first week of the new year. The new year is also when our vacation days/sick time re-ups.
However, Fiona showed up 2 weeks early and my manager also found out she was expecting and was due on New years eve. so i did work a few days in December.
Having experienced one of the worst winters in philly history this year, I developed major weather anxiety and hating driving any where esp to work with the baby. On top of that, the entire month of February my husband worked 7 day a week night shift so i was the solo parent and barely saw him.
If i could do it all over again I would have stayed home 6 months through the winter and made my husband stay home at least a week after coming home from the hospital.
persimmon / 1361 posts
@HolisticMama: I went back at 8 weeks with both LO's born via c section. It was hard to leave them for sure but I don't think 4 more weeks would have made it any easier. I do think 8 weeks is the minimum in my opinion. They sort of start getting sleep figured out at that point so that at least you are a little less of a zombie. I know some people do 6, but if you can afford the extra 2, i'd do it. I took 3 weeks of vacation and 5 weeks unpaid. We were okay doing this financially.
watermelon / 14467 posts
Minimum is 12 weeks, which is what I took. Ideally, I'd love to be home for a year. I was still a mess when I went back at 12 weeks, and it wasn't until 10 months that I actually started to feel rested and competent at my job.
I saved up some money before hand and my company requires you to use any vacation, sick, and comp time you have concurrently with your leave. We don't qualify for FMLA, so it's great that they gave me the 12 weeks. So, I was paid, but it was very much reduced from what I normally make and I wasn't paid at all the last month of my leave, which was stressful when our heater broke during a cold snap and we had to drop $600 we didn't really have on it.
ETA: At six weeks, I was still bleeding and sore from my uncomplicated vaginal delivery. My baby refused to sleep unless she was held and we were dealing with our second bout of thrush and I had to throw out our entire stash of frozen milk. I would not have been a good employee had I gone back then.
persimmon / 1361 posts
@HolisticMama: I feel like men (both my DH and boss) don't really "get it" at why mommas need the time off. It isn't a vacation and they can't relate to what you need (bonding time, healing, learning to breastfeed (if you chose to) and sleep!). You work outside the home, why does he "control the finances entirely"? Not that I think one partner should control the finances entirely in any marriage, even if the one of them stays at home. You should take a look and see if you can swing it. 2 weeks extra really makes a big difference in an infant, in my opinion.
pomelo / 5628 posts
Minimum 12 weeks - I can't even imagine going back sooner and/or leaving a 6 week old with someone else. So sad.
Ideal 6 months.
Since I'm a teacher and our situation was very complicated with a 25-weeker preemie and a nearly 5 month NICU stay, I ended up missing 7 months, then had a short 6 weeks at the end of the school year that I had to go back (grandparents watched him), before having the summer off. So he was 7 months adjusted when I really went back to work.
kiwi / 687 posts
Something else to consider - I physically (MD orders) had to stop work when I was 36wks pregnant, but didn't give birth till almost 42wks, so that was a full six weeks leave right there before he was even born... Babies and what they require are not predictable!
pomegranate / 3231 posts
I was home for 11.5 weeks after my son was born. He is now 6.5 months old. Honestly, I am glad to be back at work. I really value my time with the baby, but if I had to spend all day with him I think it would drive me crazy.
That being said, I had a lot of challenges with breastfeeding, and I did not turn the corner on that until 8 weeks. It probably took about 4 months for my body (backs, hips) to not HURT somehow every day.
I think I would have been fine with going back any time between 10 and 16 weeks. 8 would have been too short because I needed a few pain-free weeks of full time breastfeeding in order to feel established in our nursing relationship.
I spent 10 days on vacation with my son and my husband a few weeks ago, and it was way too intense. I never had any time to myself, and it nearly killed me. So, I think it depends on your personality!
grapefruit / 4988 posts
I'm sort of torn on this because I was so ready to get back to work by the end of my maternity (14 weeks). LO was high needs, cranky, slept sooo poorly (naps and night) and it was generally pretty stressful being at home with her. My maternity leave was also during the winter, so we were stuck inside most of the time. That being said, I was kind of useless at work for the first few months because LO had so many MOTN wakings and we both were sick alot when she started daycare. She started sleeping MUCH better after we sleep trained at 5 months, and she was just generally a much easier baby by 6 months. So I answered 6 months.
Member | Posts |
---|---|
winter_wonder | 2 |
DesertDreams88 | 1 |
Mrs. Pajamas | 1 |
Today | Monthly Record | |
---|---|---|
Topics | 1 | 0 |
Posts | 0 | 1 |
Ask for Help
Make a Suggestion
Frequently Asked Questions
Bee Levels
Acronyms
Most Viewed Posts
Hellobee Gold
Hellobee Recipes
Hellobee Features
Hellobee Contests
Baby-led Weaning
Bento Boxes
Breastfeeding
Newborn Essentials
Parties
Postpartum Care Essentials
Sensory Play Activities
Sleep Training
Starting Solids Gear
Transitioning to Toddler Bed
All Series
Who We Are
About the Bloggers
About the Hostesses
Contributing Bloggers
Apply to Blog
Apply to Hostess
Submit a Guest Blog
Hellobee Buttons
How We Make Money
Community Policies