Hellobee Boards

We didn't have much in the way of 24 month stuff with DD1, because she was in it by 1 year and was also skinny and just needed the length. Since our second was a girl, we didn't buy much at all, so she was the same-- pretty much straight to 2T. I think they're awfully close size-wise though, and vary by brand.

We pretty much skipped 24mo size too! IMO the difference is really minimal and with my lanky kids, 2T just fits better overall.

DS1 totally skipped 18-24 months, but DS2 didn't. I guess it depends on the kid and season.

LO has been in 18-24 months & 24 months for a while. Maybe it is just how I have shopped but I've found she's actually skipping 2T more than anything! She is moving into 3T pants but still is wearing a lot of 24 months stuff.

Most of our clothes that size were hand me downs so he did wear several 24 month shirts. He did outgrow those before he outgrew the 2t ones. He is tiny so he never fit into 24 month pants or shorts really. We had one pair of pants in a brand that runs small that actually fit. Even now at 3 he wears 18 month shorts and 2t or 3t pants but they have to have an adjustable waist. 24 months are still huge in the waist., He potty trained early too which did not help matters with his bottoms!

I went straight to 2t once my DD started outgrowing her 18 months stuff. Even though the shirts are a little snug on her belly, the length is good. (She's 50th for height, 90th for weight). I figured that the 2t might fit her a little longer because I'm hoping she'll just grow height wise and they'll fit longer than 24 month. That's my theory anyway.

My son wore both those sizes at the same time.

We used them both at the same time. I went more by what outfit I wanted than whether it was 2t or 24m.