I think I would have 4. I want to give equal attention to my kids.
-
still 2!
-
Still 2 here too!
-
2, 3 or 4. We are undecided. It would be more than 1, though.
-
No lottery involved I still want 6.
-
However many I decide I want. I've been waffling a lot lately...some days I think I'd happily have more than DD, other days I think I'm a fool to let DH near me, haha!
-
I still think that 3 would be my ideal.
-
Just three. We're about to have our second but if money were no object, I think we wouldn't be afraid to try for our third in a year or two.
-
Still only 2-3 like our plan.
-
2 with the possibility of a third. Lottery or not, i need my sanity!
-
It's not really a matter of money. I still sway on this all the time. On one hand I think it's "practical" to have 2 children. On the other hand, I kind of want 4 or 5 lmao. We're financially able to have up to 5 children rather comfortably.
-
Just the one I'm currently pregnant with, same as our plan. All the money in the world wouldn't make pregnancy be something I ever want to do again. We would consider adoption though.
-
3. Then I'd have some nips, tucks, and push ups:)
-
2-3. It's only partly about the money for us, it's also about how much attention we have to give.
ETA: Not that I think that parents with more kids don't pay enough attention, but I'm 1 of 7 and was pretty much ignored growing up so I want to be able to smother my kids with attention, lol.
-
I would have 3--one more biological and adopt another child. I have one currently and am still debating about number 2.
-
It would be the same. MAYBE 2, but possibly just 1. It's not a matter of money for me, but a matter of patience.
-
Still 2 at the most.
-
I think I would want 4.
-
I think 3 would be my max, lottery or not.
-
No change, still 2... or maybe 3.. but no more than 3.
-
@PrincessBaby: this exactly!!
-
I'd give in to DH's dream of 4, but I would use a surrogate for 3 of them.
-
I only want 1. That wouldn't change with any lottery win.
-
Still only 2 (possibly 3). I SAH full time now and I still feel really good about just having two.
-
I would still be done at 2. I'd take the money and travel with them =))
-
We would adopt as many special-needs kids as we could responsibly parent. Probably quite a few.
-
If we decide to have kids, it'll be two. If we decide to have kids AND win the lottery, it'll still be two.
-
I'd have 2 for sure instead of the almost certain 1 I will be having now. I'd also have them close together, like 2 years! Finances are our main obstacle to having a 2nd kid. Wish they weren't!
-
3 maybe 4. I could hire lots of help.
-
five plus, with a nanny.
ETA: I have this thing with odd numbers, so it would be five, not six, seven, not eight. I'm just weird.
-
I would have 3 biological still - which is our plan... but then adopt a ton of babies!!! like 5!! And I'd buy a big house for all of them. It would be awesome. I would love it.
-
4-6!
-
@Mrs. Pen: Not right now. Probably a year or two (closer to a year). Our only hold up is buying a house and we'll be doing that this year, hopefully. After that, it's fair game.
-
A lot! (I think). Would probably adopt a few!
-
@KissMeCait: I edited my post cause I saw your profile said waiting! Buying a house is fun! Where in NY are you looking to buy? I lived in NY for a year and loved it, my DH grew up on Long Island - he really misses it!
-
I think my answer would still be the same at 2-3.
-
4! But maybe I would foster parent after my kids grew up
-
It isn't really a matter of money. We still would probably only want 1 or 2.... maaaaybe 3 if the first 2 are really really quiet. lol.
-
2 or 3
-
We would still only have 3 or 4. He wants 2 but will settle on 3. I really want 4 but I guess I kinda need him for that last one. Looks like 3 it is! lol
Subscribe to our newsletter
- Google Plus
- Stumbleupon
- Twitter
- Facebook
- Pinterest
- Favorite0
43 comments