I thought this was an interesting article about the study done by Harvard Business School.
Thoughts?
I thought this was an interesting article about the study done by Harvard Business School.
Thoughts?
pear / 1955 posts
I thought this was super interesting! My only issue is that it basically defines success for women as having a higher income and being in a supervisory position. Which isn't really my idea of success at all, and moreover, implies being a stay at home mom or not in a supervisory position is being unsuccessful in life.
apricot / 343 posts
IMO, it's a load of crap. My mom was SAHM to me, 2 sisters and brother. We all couldn't be more different. I could care less about a career. One of my sisters (4 kids) was very successful and made 6 figures until she decided to stay at home with her boys. My other sister (2 kids) just went back to school to get her doctorate. My brother (2 kids) is successful and caring, so....
PS - I didn't read the whole article
grapefruit / 4800 posts
I think they have an interesting view of successful. If my kids stayed at home to raise kids id consider them successful.
nectarine / 2148 posts
I think the study is interesting, but not at all surprising. I agree that the title of the article isn't very appropriate...certainly success isn't just defined to working. However, since children often model after their parents, I don't find it terribly surprising.
persimmon / 1481 posts
Yeah I agree with PP, why is it better for a woman to be successful in the work force but not as a mother? And why is it better for the sons to be more caring? Isn't being a caring mother just as important? I'm sure that being a loving parent with children who are healthy and cared for is more important than the mothers work status. Both working and non working mothers are capable of raising well-adjusted, successful children.
grapefruit / 4731 posts
It was an interesting read. As a WOHM I hope I raise caring sons. I hope they are caring because I raised them that way, but magically being caring because I work is great too.
I think even though this article said there is statistically significant at the 99% level, there are still too many factors that cause a person to be “successful” or not… or “caring” or not.
grape / 76 posts
Just waiting on the study about children of working fathers to compare the effects of their working outside the home on their children...waiting, waiting, waiting........
wonderful pear / 26210 posts
I think it's a really interesting article, I'd love to read the study.
grapefruit / 4291 posts
Interesting article but I suspect it's just kids modelling what they grew up with. For example, a child of a working mother places higher value on work simply because that's what's been modelled for them.
papaya / 10570 posts
I would be very interested to see how happy the grown up children are in this study, alongside how "successful". I want my daughter to be happy in her future.
cantaloupe / 6669 posts
@raspberries: @Maysprout: @Eko: @turquoisemama: Agree with all of you.
nectarine / 2433 posts
@Eko: I totally agree. Most children, at least to some extent model what they see growing up.
In general I wasn't thrilled with how they defined success but thought it was interesting none the less
pineapple / 12526 posts
I think it's interesting.... but just one more mommy war study that people are going to get butthurt over.
Can we just cure cancer or something?
Today | Monthly Record | |
---|---|---|
Topics | 0 | 1 |
Posts | 1 | 3 |
Ask for Help
Make a Suggestion
Frequently Asked Questions
Bee Levels
Acronyms
Most Viewed Posts
Hellobee Gold
Hellobee Recipes
Hellobee Features
Hellobee Contests
Baby-led Weaning
Bento Boxes
Breastfeeding
Newborn Essentials
Parties
Postpartum Care Essentials
Sensory Play Activities
Sleep Training
Starting Solids Gear
Transitioning to Toddler Bed
All Series
Who We Are
About the Bloggers
About the Hostesses
Contributing Bloggers
Apply to Blog
Apply to Hostess
Submit a Guest Blog
Hellobee Buttons
How We Make Money
Community Policies