-
probably 4. My bff is 1 of 4 and their sibling dynamics is pretty awesome! Plus, there was 2 boys and 2 girls so that worked out nicely as well. However, if I have 3 boys, I'm not sure I wanna try for another! haha. 4 boys plus DH??? Oh man.... I'm a huge tomboy, but that may be just too much for me. haha
-
3 I think is the most I could handle, maybe 4! But the thought of 4 tough pregnancies and 4 C-sections sound miserable!
-
4 + fostering children
-
2 with the option for 3, but I would lean heavily towards a third. (FWIW, this is exactly our actual plan, so more money wouldn't change anything.)
-
we always wanted 2 and i'd still stick with 2!
-
Five, with two nannies
-
3-4
-
I'd go full Duggar, haha! Honestly if $$ wasn't an issue, I would probably 1) be pregnant with #2 already and 2) would just keep going until it felt like we were complete or couldn't handle more. I think minimum would be 4.
-
@Alivoo01: good point. I think once I had two boys I'd be like ok maybeeeeeeee we press pause. BUT unlimited money = NANNIES, haha. My aunt's twin boys though have me scarred.
-
4, I'd love to have a huge family. Unfortunately, money and rough pregnancies wise we will be stopping at 2
-
How about if age were no object...
If I was younger and richer, I'd probably rock out with three or four.
-
4!!
-
Ugh, for now still 2 just b/c 1st trimester hasn't been fun! So it's not really about the $, more about me being pregnant!
-
Money wouldn't change anything for me, I would still only want one child.
-
3 but we decide or more of I decide we'll stop at 2 unless the next pregnancy results in twins which they do run on both sides of our families so it's possible and I totally wouldn't mind that
- Google Plus
- Stumbleupon
- Twitter
- Facebook
- Pinterest
- Favorite0
54 comments