Hellobee Boards

Login/Register

Vaccine Refusals Fueled California's Whooping Cough Epidemic

  1. FarmWifeGina

    pear / 1571 posts

    @plantains: So, what about unvaccinated adults? Or adults that haven't had every single vaccine that the CDC now recommends? Which, ahem, is most of us, since even people my age who were vaccinated completely on schedule and per recommendations, but didn't get nearly the same number of inoculations that this generation's kids get. Sorry, it's just a big inconsistency I see. In my perspective, it seems like just another way of saying my kid is better than those kids.

  2. Maysprout

    grapefruit / 4800 posts

    The most effective argument for getting whooping cough boosters I've found with my families and friends is to explain how immunity wanes over time. And that with waning immunity you get increased symptoms, which often correlate with increased transmissibility of the virus to another person. While in healthy adults who have a robust immune system aren't going to be diagnosed with the whooping cough when it's in it's more mild form it'll just seem like a cold it can still be transmitted to others and result in full-blown infection. This is especially problematic for babies and the elderly.

    I'm a skeptical person but I've spent many years studying vaccines and have seen the results first hand. Unless there's someone magical that comes into the animal rooms and switches around everyone's experimental groups every night then vaccines work. And for me the person would have to be magical because the mice are labeled in a coded way and not even people in my lab bother to ask the code.

  3. plantains

    grapefruit / 4671 posts

    @junebugmama: Not rude at all, it is a totally valid question! I don't ask them all now that she is older, but when she was under 6 months, yes I absolutely did.

    Now, if they might become regular playmates i.e frequent playdates then I ask. It is a requirement in her daycare and most of her friends are from theer so I don't worry about that. Casual acquaitances, I don't ask but if they volunteer the information then I don't really want DD playing with unvaxed kiddos.

    I don't know what will happen down the line as she gets older, theer is only so much I can do, but I do know that if it were up to me, I would limit her exposure as much as possible. I recognise however, that it isn't really practical.

  4. plantains

    grapefruit / 4671 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: I didn't let her around anyone who hadn't had boosters until she was 6 months old. In my line of work I do a lot of travel and so most of the people I am around are up to date.

    If you feel that you are making the best choice for your kid by not vaccinating them because you feel that vaccines are harmful and unnecessary, then why is my decision to limit my DD's exposure to non-vaxed kids seen as saying my kid is better than yours? It has nothing to do with being better than, and I don't really know you are getting from vaccinations to elitism.

    If you get to choose not to vax your kid and I get to choose to vax mine, then why wouldn't I be able to say that I would prefer that she didn't play with non-vaxed kids?

  5. deerylou

    pomegranate / 3003 posts

    Once LO comes of age, and has received all her important vaccines, I have no problem with her being around unvaccinated children, as I have faith in the protection being provided by her doctor. However, I don't think she will get much opportunity, as those close to us vaccinate against major diseases, and she will be attending public school.

    I didn't receive a single flu shot until I was an adult, and still escaped some seasons without getting ill. I don't anticipate that LO will come out of childhood without at least a few nasty illnesses under her belt, so I will not run around, making sure that every one of her schoolyard friends has had an up-to-date flu shot.

    However, I will limit her exposure to people who opt out of the TDAP vaccine this year, as pertussis is not something her little body could handle. I don't believe that my choice is made to ostracize anyone; I am simply making a safe, informed decision to ensure a healthy, happy baby.

    The point of this thread was to share a credible article - the first I've read, personally, that made a direct connection between a recent epidemic and those who choose to opt out of vaccines. I was, and still am genuinely curious if those who opt out feel comfortable doing so because most of the population is currently inoculated and not regularly spreading major contagious diseases .I don't think any of it was meant as an attack.

  6. MsLipGloss

    GOLD / pineapple / 12662 posts

    @plantains: I agree. This is not an elitism/elitist issue. This is a health issue. Period.

  7. junebugmama

    nectarine / 2019 posts

    @plantains: I wonder if the mamas I come in contact with just assume that we are fully vaxed, since I work for the hospital.

  8. FarmWifeGina

    pear / 1571 posts

    @plantains: Ummmmm, it's threads like these that makes me think there's a lot of elitism that goes with it. But you're right and it's yourchoice. Just like I may or may not be my choice to not let my kid play with a kid who's recently had a live virus vaccine.

    Personally, I truly and honestly feel that vaccination is a HARD subject with so much information out there, I respect every parent who does their research and goes with what they believe, no matter which side of the aisle they fall. I can understand both sides. And the "better than them" attitudes that I find on forums on both sides of the issue just bugs the CRAP outta me.

  9. FarmWifeGina

    pear / 1571 posts

    @deerylou: I'm sorry for derailing your thread. It's a point I see vehemently belabored on seemingly every vaccination thread on HB and today my 33-week pregnant self decided to be snarky about it.

    FTR, I was referring to fully vaccinated children being kept from the unvaccinated ones. Not ones too little to receive certain innoculations.

  10. 2PeasinaPod

    pomelo / 5524 posts

    We're on schedule for 100% vaccinations though his MMR will be slightly delayed (about a month) since they didn't want his flu and MMR to be too close together.

    While I respect the fact that everyone has a choice, I have a hard time understanding the non-vax perspective. I think perhaps that it's just that I disagree with most of the arguments that are brought to light, and the benefits of the vaccinations greatly outweigh the risks in my opinion.

    And while I do have a hard time understanding the non-vax perspective, I don't have a problem with my little guy playing with non-vaccinated children/adults.

  11. sunny

    coconut / 8430 posts

    We vaccinate 100% and feel strongly about it. I agree it's not an elitist issue but a public health issue.

  12. deerylou

    pomegranate / 3003 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: No need to apologize; I understand this can be a touchy subject. Just to offer some perspective, I don't believe those who choose to vaccinate necessarily believe they are better than, or more elite, than those who opt out. I genuinely believe they view inoculations as a means of maintaining a healthy society. For me, personally, I believe that we have nearly eliminated the threat of measles, smallpox, and polio thanks to modern medicine, but it still takes the efforts of our society to maintain that level of protection.

    I am mainly concerned about those who cannot (but would otherwise choose to) be vaccinated due to age or health condition. I don't think it's fair to expose the most vulnerable to communicable disease, which is the sole reason I will remain concerned with the unvaccinated in my own daughter's life.

  13. FarmWifeGina

    pear / 1571 posts

    *sigh* I don't think I'm being understood, but I'm not sure I should try to explain either, for want of wasted breath.

    I'm not saying vaccination is or isn't a public health issue. But I don't understand how fully vaccinated children mixing with non-vaxxed/selectively-vaxxed children is a public health issue. I get the part about those with compromised immune systems and/or can't get those specific immunizations. I guess I just don't get the "absolutely not!" when vaccines are supposed to be so good. If my child is vaccinated against something that another one isn't, then, theoretically, I'm not supposed to worry, right? Their immunizations should be enough to protect them against what another child might be carrying, right? Or not?

    It starts to feel like I should start sending my kids' vaccination records along to every birthday party and play date. Which, I totally get for immunocompromised kids, but I don't it for healthy, completely vaccinated kids. Is it really the very, very, very small risk that my child's diphtheria innoculations didn't take and an unvaccinated child just *might* be carrying diphtheria- is that it? That's why it seems to come across as a matter of "principle" and not one of risk to me.

  14. plantains

    grapefruit / 4671 posts

    @junebugmama: you are probably right, I would make that assumption!

  15. plantains

    grapefruit / 4671 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: to an extent, I do understand what you are saying, but for me given how serious some of these illnesses are I would kick myself if something did happen and I could have done something to prevent it, so at the moment it isn't a risk worth taking for me. It has nothing to do with seeing my kid as better than someone else's, I am just trying to protect the public health choice that I have made for myself and my family.

  16. pinkcupcake

    cantaloupe / 6751 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: "Is it really the very, very, very small risk that my child's diphtheria innoculations didn't take and an unvaccinated child just *might* be carrying diphtheria- is that it?" It seems like a lot of parents who choose not to vaccinate their children do so because of the "very, very small risk" that vaccines could cause harm. How then, is it wrong for parents who DO vaccinate their children to want to avoid risks as well?

  17. looch

    wonderful pear / 26210 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: I don't think it's that black and white though. It is my understanding (and someone with more knowledge than I please chime in here) that even though my child is vaxed, he is not 100% protected against the disease. So while the chance is slim, it still exists.

  18. FarmWifeGina

    pear / 1571 posts

    @plantains: Fair enough. I guess it comes down to each individual on what calculated risks they do or don't feel comfortable taking.

  19. plantains

    grapefruit / 4671 posts

    @pinkcupcake: this is exactly what i was trying to say and failing at miserably. Thank you for putting it so clearly!

  20. immabeetoo

    honeydew / 7687 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: I'll give you another perspective; right now I vaccinate fully and don't mind LO interacting with non-vaccinated kids (which is good, because we basically wouldn't be able to go anywhere public like storytime if I did mind) but it really scares me for in the future when I hopefully have a newborn as well that older LO could carry/pass something that he picked up from a non-vaccinated kid to my newborn. I would guess the same would be true of anyone who has someone living at home or in their lives who would be more susceptible to catching something or who cannot receive vaccines.

  21. deerylou

    pomegranate / 3003 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: I do understand what you're saying, and to some extent, agree with you. I'm not going to barricade my school-aged daughter from a friend that missed their seasonal flu shot. However, while she is a vulnerable infant, I am going to do my best to maintain her good health. This may mean politely avoiding the sick and non-vaxxed. Like @plantains: mentioned, I would never stop kicking myself in the ass if I could have prevented a dangerous and potentially fatal illness, but chose to turn a blind eye in order to remain all-inclusive.

    That being said, I will not hesitate to reschedule playdates, decline invitations, and encourage space with vaxxed *and* non-vaxxed kids that have discolored, runny mucous, a barking cough, or recent episodes of vomiting, regardless of what type of preventative medicine DD has or has not received.

  22. IcebergMom

    persimmon / 1295 posts

    can i write this in size 20 font... i wish...

    I AM SO HAPPY I LIVE IN A COUNTRY WITH VACCINES!

  23. banana

    coconut / 8299 posts

    @IcebergMom: This is exactly what I wanted to say!! Pro vaccine or not, I'm just very grateful that our country has vaccines readily available for anyone who chooses to take them.

  24. IRunForFun

    pomelo / 5509 posts

    As someone who only received 1/4 of the dose of the pertussis vaccine because I had an allergic reaction, my parents had to rely on herd immunity and hope I'd stay healthy. In the early 80s and 90s, when I was growing up, there weren't as many anti-vaccination parents, so it wasn't as much of a concern. But then I worked in a drop-in daycare center at a gym when I was in college, when the anti-vaccine movement was really gaining ground. I caught whooping cough and it was miserable for everyone. I had to leave campus wearing a mask, the college had to send out an alert, and the daycare center, of course, had freaked out parents of children that for some reason or another COULDN'T receive the pertussis vaccine and had been exposed. Along with the fact that, ya know, I was horribly ill.

    My sister worked in a private daycare a few years ago and caught mumps because of an un-vaccinated child. MUMPS! She was so sick it was scary. The doctor basically said, even though she had been vaccinated, the vaccines don't provide 100% protection.

    These are illnesses that could easily have been prevented if OTHER people had vaccinated. I got sick because I didn't have a choice in whether or not I got the vaccination, but someone else did have the choice, and chose not to. It seemed unfair to me.

    Seeing how sick and miserable both my sister and I were when we caught these things in our 20s, I'd never risk having an infant or small child, without a fully-formed immune system, take that chance.

    To me, the benefits far outweigh the risks.

  25. lindseykaye

    pear / 1992 posts

    @scg00387: Yes. It's not always about individual-individual contact. It's a giant web and to keep it all together, we need most of the people connected through it to be protected.

  26. IcebergMom

    persimmon / 1295 posts

    @IRunForFun: @lindseykaye: agree agree agree!

  27. MsLipGloss

    GOLD / pineapple / 12662 posts

    @IRunForFun: Thank you for sharing that - I think it really added to the discussion.

  28. Mrs. Pen

    blogger / wonderful cherry / 21616 posts

    @IRunForFun: the MMR vaccine can't be administered until at least 12 mos, some providers not giving it until 15 or 18mos... so at a daycare there is a high percentage of the kids not vaccinated for it considering the ages. So I'm curious what else could have been done in that case. I am sorry for you and your sister - it sounds so scary!!!

    @scg00387: I've actually always been curious about this. Do you know if there happen to be any studies that show if a vaccinated child can be a "carrier" of a disease? Say your son was exposed to pertussis, he could carry it home and give it to his sibling? I am super curious. I haven't ever seen any medical data to back up this theory so I'm interested in knowing if it's true or not since that is a potential worry of mine as well.

  29. IRunForFun

    pomelo / 5509 posts

    @Mrs. Pen: Oops, sorry, should have mentioned that the daycare was an educational daycare for 3-and-4-year-old children. So they were all well beyond the age when they "should have" received the MMR vaccine.

    @MsLipGloss: Of course. I just can't imagine a poor, innocent baby having to struggle with one of these illnesses. If I didn't have a strong opinion about it before, my personal experiences certainly helped me form one!

  30. Mrs. Pen

    blogger / wonderful cherry / 21616 posts

    @IRunForFun: oooh ok, that makes sense. Thanks

  31. immabeetoo

    honeydew / 7687 posts

    @Mrs. Pen: http://www.kidzdoc.com/uploads/files/pertussis-whooping-cough.pdf I just searched for pertussis; this states that adults can be carriers. My pedi said it was possible for anyone to be a carrier, and of course that someone vaccinated could still contest the disease and pass it on that way as well. I would guess that the same would be true for other diseases; there was a pertussis outbreak where I delivered so that's the only one I remember specifically asking about.

  32. deerylou

    pomegranate / 3003 posts

    I suppose I still have questions, which I attempted to outline in my OP, but have yet to get feedback on. I would hope that someone could offer their insight or opinion, as I'm genuinely curious!

    For those who choose to opt out of vaccines, do you admittedly feel safer in your decision because the majority of the population opts in? If the non-vaxxed population grew considerably, and illnesses like whooping cough became the norm, and old school viruses like measles and smallpox found their way out of the vault, would you still feel confident that your risk of exposure was minute? If vaccinating is not worth the risk, how do you propose we best protect vulnerable populations such as infants and the elderly?

  33. lindseykaye

    pear / 1992 posts

    @Mrs. Pen: I can't point to any studies, but my understanding is that anyone can be a carrier of a virus. Whether that turns into sickness depends on your ability to fight it off - something that vaccinated individuals have a boost with. And that someone who is unvaccinated has a higher chance of carrying around and transmitting the virus as their body will take longer to eliminate its traces within their immune system, because they are starting from scratch having no existing antibodies to work against it.

  34. Freckles

    honeydew / 7444 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: While i do not agree with your choice to not vaccinate your children as it hurts herd immunity, i do see why you feel it's more about principle than health. Especially since there is more danger to your children than the other way around.

    This was an old ethics column that i found pretty interesting: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/magazine/01wwln-ethicist-t.html

    I still don't believe it's an elitist thing (the average person who doesn't choose to vaccinate are actually middle-class, college-educated Americans). I would say it's the other way around since those who don't vaccinate believe their knowledge triumphs that of doctors and researchers in the public health field.

  35. FarmWifeGina

    pear / 1571 posts

    @plantains: @pinkcupcake: @looch: Ok, I get it. It IS about risk to you, regardless of how much attitude I read into it here on the internet. Oh, those filthy, germy little children, they're not coming anywhere near mine. Again, calculated risk. Theoretically, one vaccinated child could get another vaccinated child sick for something for which they've both been vaccinated. Or a vaccinated child could get an unvaccinated one sick. Etc., etc. Sorry, just playing devil's advocate.

    @deerylou: I guess I'm not talking about all-inclusiveness, I just didn't get why some parents seem to draw this line, to choose this hill to die on, so to speak. But what you're saying is common sense. I don't take my kids places when they're sick, and I very much appreciate it when other moms cancel play dates because they have nasty colds, vaccination status notwithstanding.

  36. Freckles

    honeydew / 7444 posts

    @lindseykaye: Yes, that's a great way of describing it!

  37. looch

    wonderful pear / 26210 posts

    @FarmWifeGina: Please don't put words in my mouth, or keyboard, or whatever. I don't recall writing anything about germy children. My son's plenty germy.

    In any event, your unvaxed child is still at risk when playing with my vaxed child, it is also about risk to your kid.

  38. FarmWifeGina

    pear / 1571 posts

    @Freckles: Actually, my children ARE vaccinated against the big, bad diseases. Just clearing that up. I'm not an anti-vaxxer. It's just my bone to pick on HB today.

    But I do *personally* (meaning, not random people I've heard of on the internet) know several practicing doctors who have chosen not to fully vaccinate their children. So I don't think it's fair to say us commoners shouldn't question it when not even all medical professionals are agreed on what vaccinations and when.

  39. allison

    pear / 1895 posts

    I don't really believe that herd immunity is as effective as everyone thinks. Mainly because, until fairly recently, vaccinations were believed to immunize an individual for life. Now we know they wear off and need to be readministered, something like at least every 10 years? I think it's different for every vaccine, regarding its longevity, and probably varies from individual to individual. So that means that for something like 50 years, most adults were not up-to-date on their vaccines. How did herd immunity function if this was the case? Also, what percentage of adults in the US do you think are up-to-date on their vaccines now? I would guess that's a pretty low number, but maybe not.

    FWIW, I've spoken to my brother, who is a physician, about this. He claims that the vaccinations alter your DNA enough that, even if a titer doesn't show immunization for a given disease, if you contracted that disease after at some point being vaccinated for it, your body would still be able to fight the disease much better than someone who'd never been vaccinated. You would likely contract the illness, but wouldn't get as sick.

    I don't know, it's a really hard decision for me, and not one I take lightly. We're choosing to delay vaccinations for now, because I don't feel like an infant's immune system is always strong enough to handle the increasingly high number of vaccinations they are being administered. I understand the concern of others regarding the safety of their children when they support CDC-scheduled vaccinations, but I will always do what I feel is best for my child.

  40. FarmWifeGina

    pear / 1571 posts

    @looch: I'm sorry, I don't mean to put words in anyone's mouth. That's just how most HB vaccination threads start sounding to me after awhile.

Reply »

You must login / Register to post

© copyright 2011-2014 Hellobee